Hi,
Thanks for finally fixing this long standing and disturbing bug!
Do you think it will get a Lenny freeze exception? :)
--
Cheers,
Feri.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.11.1453 +0100]:
> Still waiting for upstream to give an okay. This is not to sound
> impatient, just telling the world that I haven't received one yet.
Luk informed me that the patch has been committed upstream and he
pushed 1.60-22 to the a
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.11.1000 +0100]:
> Yes, that would make sense. Also, it has been suggested to add
> --wide as a synonym.
>
> You can just recreate the diff, no need to create a new changelog
> entry.
Attached is the updated patch and upstream is again on Cc
also sprach Luar Roji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.11.0909 +0100]:
> I forgot to add a description of the flag in the help page, do you
> want I add it?
>
> What about the manpage?
Yes, that would make sense. Also, it has been suggested to add
--wide as a synonym.
You can just recreate the diff
tags 254243 patch
thanks
@Phil, net-tools upstream: here is a patch proposal for netstat, you
can find information and the discussion leading up to it here:
http://bugs.debian.org/254243
If you could acknowledge that you like the solution and want to
integrate it into netstat, then we could try
also sprach Luar Roji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.20.2146 +0200]:
> Maybe (only maybe!) we can make a NEW version of netstat, and show a warning
> when chopping is happening, so we don't break actual scripts, and in the new
> version we can do what we want without being afraid, what do you think?
Luar Roji wrote:
I think it's important enough to have it fixed in lenny, but don't know what
other people think about.
I think it should've been fixed before Etch. ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it's important enough to have it fixed in lenny, but don't know what
other people think about.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:50:59PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Luar Roji wrote:
>> I think we have to fix it soon, some way or another..
>
> Before or after Lenny?
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I think we have to fix it soon, some way or another..
I would preffer to keep the actual behaviour so no scripts are harmed. But
it's real that we don't want to have to add a new command line flag always
from now!
Now, another fact is that netstat was always tabular, and I think we are used
to
Luar Roji wrote:
I think we have to fix it soon, some way or another..
Before or after Lenny?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.20.1259 +0200]:
Address HWtype HWaddress Flags MaskIface
192.168.1.34 ether 00:17:31:64:23:c5 Ceth0
192.168.1.254ether 00:19:cb:43:af:b7 Ceth0
also sprach Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.20.1259 +0200]:
> Address HWtype HWaddress Flags MaskIface
> 192.168.1.34 ether 00:17:31:64:23:c5 Ceth0
> 192.168.1.254ether 00:19:cb:43:af:b7 Ceth0
>
> This looks pret
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.20.1244 +0200]:
That's fine for machine readable output, but what about human readable
output?
That's debateable. I find e.g. 'ip route list' output far better
than /sbin/route by now. The same applies to 'ip ad
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.19.1125 +0200]:
I think it should be merged with #222324
I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
I don't want to have to rely on a width switch. I'd say that netstat
should out
also sprach Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.20.1244 +0200]:
> That's fine for machine readable output, but what about human readable
> output?
That's debateable. I find e.g. 'ip route list' output far better
than /sbin/route by now. The same applies to 'ip address list' vs.
/sbin/
also sprach Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.19.1125 +0200]:
> I think it should be merged with #222324
> I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
I don't want to have to rely on a width switch. I'd say that netstat
should output line-oriented and s
Luk Claes wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I think it should be merged with #222324
I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
It's a bit unclear to me what Bernd's objections are and what he
Yeah, it's unclear to me too. ;)
That was the core of the issue.
i
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> I think it should be merged with #222324
> I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
It's a bit unclear to me what Bernd's objections are and what he
intended to incorporate, so I kind of decided to delay this till after
lenny. But I don
I think it should be merged with #222324
I'm willing to continue work on my patch from 2005 if Luk and Martin agree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the status of this bug report/patch?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
The only Mens Enlargement Supplement that has been proven to work as a medical
certainty.
http://www.Frenkinlins.com/
One Stop Shop for All Your Needs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thick, long and rock hard - go for hours without stopping.
http://www.miverllens.com/
I banged her till she bled
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purchase Prescirptions and Mdeications asap
www.aforementionedawesome.baroness%2Elagtiu.com
it bargainautomatic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take Prescriptinos and Medicatiosn asap
www.www.antedateanselm.absinthe%2Ekusanra.com
it appliedannex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Already answered this one.
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:05:21 -0200
From: Luar Roji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Modification of netstat.c in package net-tools
Hi Bernd, how are you? My name is Luar Roji.
I had some problems with netstat that truncated information that was re
Hi,
I also ran into this problem and have tried both patches here. I don't
really like the second one since in addition to having to supply a -v
flag you get spurious warnings depending on what address families are
installed:
netstat: no support for `AF IPX' on this system.
netstat: no supp
severity 254243 important
thanks
yes it is possible.
The new version will feature a -X option which enforce script-parseable,
untruncated netstat output. Then the bug can be a wishlist to better use the
available interactive screen space.
Gruss
Bernd
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:23:56PM +, J
Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've increased the severity to normal as these bugs do affect the
> usefulness of the netstat app.
Can we increase it further? This is not cosmetic. I just
suffered an attack on my httpd from a runaway host, and I couldn't
determine which h
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Do you mind if an NMU is done to fix this issue?
An NMU for a Wishlist Bug is IMHO not aproperiate, especially not since the
fixing patch may break existing scripts.
The patch I submitted does not chang
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Do you mind if an NMU is done to fix this issue?
An NMU for a Wishlist Bug is IMHO not aproperiate, especially not since the
fixing patch may break existing scripts.
Gruss
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
( .. )
Hi Bernd,
Do you mind if an NMU is done to fix this issue?
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bernd,
What is the status of this bug?
Did you decide about the offered patches already?
Greetings,
Olaf
Here is an updated version of my patch which fixes the "tcp" vs. "udp"
string in the protocol lookup bit of the unified tcpudp_one_end.
Ian.
diff -Nru /tmp/BEfybKtWqd/net-tools-1.60/debian/changelog
/tmp/BQGUuO9HrM/net-tools-1.60/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/BEfybKtWqd/net-tools-1.60/debian/changel
On 9/29/05, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: netstat IPv6 address truncation patch"):
> > On 9/29/05, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Without -n, addresses are turned into domain names, which are often
> > > truncated by the narrow field width.
>
Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: netstat IPv6 address truncation patch"):
> On 9/29/05, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Without -n, addresses are turned into domain names, which are often
> > truncated by the narrow field width.
>
> But I think that's not desired by users.
I agree that i
On 9/29/05, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: netstat IPv6 address truncation patch"):
> > On 9/29/05, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, but only if -n is used. Otherwise people are presumably already
> > > used to truncation.
> >
> > I'm not s
Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: netstat IPv6 address truncation patch"):
> On 9/29/05, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, but only if -n is used. Otherwise people are presumably already
> > used to truncation.
>
> I'm not sure about that.
Without -n, addresses are turned into domain
On 9/29/05, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > at it it seems to just add a new command-line flag for not truncating
> > > the address. That's wrong, IMO.
> >
> > --wide is enabled by default on interactive terminals
> > Bernd prefered that way to avoid breaking any scripts.
>
> ?
>
> My
Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: netstat IPv6 address truncation patch"):
> There are two patches. The second version is in another format.
Ah, yes.
> > at it it seems to just add a new command-line flag for not truncating
> > the address. That's wrong, IMO.
>
> --wide is enabled by default on in
On 9/29/05, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: netstat IPv6 address truncation patch"):
> > Did you see my related patch at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=222324
> >
> > It should also solve the truncation issue but I think it's more genera
Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: netstat IPv6 address truncation patch"):
> Did you see my related patch at
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=222324
>
> It should also solve the truncation issue but I think it's more general.
The thing you sent to the Debian BTS is an ed-format dif
Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: netstat IPv6 address truncation patch"):
> > +static void tcpudp_one_end(char *result_buf, size_t result_buf_size,
> > + struct aftype *ap, int end_port,
> > + struct sockaddr *endaddr)
> > +{
> > +char buffer[8192];
> > +
> +static void tcpudp_one_end(char *result_buf, size_t result_buf_size,
> +struct aftype *ap, int end_port,
> +struct sockaddr *endaddr)
> +{
> +char buffer[8192];
> +
> +snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer), "%s",
> + get_sname(htons(end_
Hi Ian,
Did you see my related patch at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=222324
It should also solve the truncation issue but I think it's more general.
Hello Ian,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 04:05:45PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Looking at the code it looks like some serious overhaul is required.
> Unfortunately I don't think that I have time to do this now,
> especially at this point in Ubuntu's release cycle.
yes I agree, and you might want to jo
I am about to apply the attached patch to Ubuntu's version of
net-tools. Here is the debian/changelog entry:
net-tools (1.60-15ubuntu1) breezy; urgency=low
* Do not truncate numeric IPv6 addresses in netstat TCP and UDP.
The new output format is not parseable with the same algorithms as
46 matches
Mail list logo
