Bug#245338: Yes, you missed something!

2005-10-31 Thread Alexis Huxley
Your premise that: > he shouldn't need his local named to resolve the name of the time > server. is right; one does not need a local named in order to resolve the name of a remote time server. But ... ... running a local name server with resolv.conf containing 127.0.0.1 is quite a common and acc

Bug#245338: Yes, you missed something!

2005-10-31 Thread Alexis Huxley
Your premise that: > he shouldn't need his local named to resolve the name of the time > server. is right; one does not need a local named in order to resolve the name of a remote time server. But ... ... running a local name server with resolv.conf containing 127.0.0.1 is quite a common and acc