(Jerry CC'ed to ring a bell...:)
Quoting Julien Cristau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2007 at 00:46:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Otherwise, the patch looks sane to me, and I don't have any reason to
> > disagree with Julien's check for a compatible version of ld.
> >
> > Julien
On Sat, Jun 9, 2007 at 00:46:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Otherwise, the patch looks sane to me, and I don't have any reason to
> disagree with Julien's check for a compatible version of ld.
>
> Julien, let me know if you prefer me to advocate this patch upstream.
>
I finally sent it to sa
On Sat, Jun 9, 2007 at 00:46:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I talked to Julien on IRC and mentioned that I thought it would be better to
> put the version script under source/libsmb instead of directly under source.
>
Patch updated.
> Otherwise, the patch looks sane to me, and I don't have a
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 08:15:52AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I rebuilt samba with the attached patch, and the number of symbols
> > exported by libsmbclient went down from more than 4000 to 51.
> > The patch adds a version script for this lib, which only exports symbols
> > matching "smbc
> I rebuilt samba with the attached patch, and the number of symbols
> exported by libsmbclient went down from more than 4000 to 51.
> The patch adds a version script for this lib, which only exports symbols
> matching "smbc_*". I added tentative detection code for the configure
> script, which ch
# Gaétan's email address has changed, so let's pretend I'm the submitter
submitter 219242 !
tags 219242 patch
kthxbye
On Wed, Nov 5, 2003 at 10:02:34 +0100, Richard Gaétan wrote:
> Some fonctions exported with libsmbclient have currents names therefore
> it is impossible to incorporate libsmbcl
6 matches
Mail list logo
