Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> I am now wondering what to do. Doing the change, introducing a
>> transitional package, shouldn't be disruptive. On the other hand,
>> leaving the package as it is is doing no harm besides the policy
>> violation that has been in p
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I am now wondering what to do. Doing the change, introducing a
> transitional package, shouldn't be disruptive. On the other hand,
> leaving the package as it is is doing no harm besides the policy
> violation that has been in place for almost a decade.
>
2 matches
Mail list logo
