Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
* Chris Hofstaedtler [250217 02:42]:
> Why do we need another binary that does something mv already does?
coreutils reverted it before it went into 9.5.
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/3416
Control: tags -1 = moreinfo
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:30:12AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 04:43:45PM +0100, Jörg Behrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtl
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 04:43:45PM +0100, Jörg Behrmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > How important is `exch`? Is it a tool that is really essential, and
> > should thus be in the "util-linux" package, which is installed on
> > each and every Debia
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> How important is `exch`? Is it a tool that is really essential, and
> should thus be in the "util-linux" package, which is installed on
> each and every Debian installation?
>
> I've been avoiding adding new stuff to "util-linux
* Jörg Behrmann [250210 12:48]:
> please include the "exch" tool in the util-linux package, that has been
> introduced in upstream util-linux' 2.40 release.
> It is a simple wrapper around renameat2's RENAME_EXCHANGE functionality to
> atomatically exchange two files.
How important is `exch`? Is
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.38.1-5+deb12u3
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainers,
please include the "exch" tool in the util-linux package, that has been
introduced in upstream util-linux' 2.40 release.
It is a simple wrapper around renameat2's RENAME_EXCHANGE functionality to
atomatically exch
6 matches
Mail list logo
