Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:03:41AM +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preusse: > > As was seen with https://bugs.debian.org/910573 this app is > > maintained upstream by the gedit maintainer who during the past > > year has done multiple soname bumps for the gedit libraries, some > > of which are used by th

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-26 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 25.01.25 Jeremy Bícha (jeremy.bi...@canonical.com) wrote: Hello, > As was seen with https://bugs.debian.org/910573 this app is > maintained upstream by the gedit maintainer who during the past > year has done multiple soname bumps for the gedit libraries, some > of which are used by this app t

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-26 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 26.01.25 Andreas Tille (ti...@debian.org) wrote: > Am Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:10:50PM +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preuße: Hello, > > No, that's fine with me. I just wanted to clarify your > > expectations to our group. As you noticed I've added a few more > > commits to glosstex; we should have don

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Hilmar, Am Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:10:50PM +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preuße: > > No, that's fine with me. I just wanted to clarify your expectations to our > group. As you noticed I've added a few more commits to glosstex; we should > have done that before upload... ;-( I confirm it would have pro

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 25.01.25 23:24, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Hello, Could I be added to Uploaders for latexila and given Salsa permissions for it? My username is jbicha I've sent you an invitation. You should be able yourself do commits to the repo. Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: Open

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Could I be added to Uploaders for latexila and given Salsa permissions for it? My username is jbicha As was seen with https://bugs.debian.org/910573 this app is maintained upstream by the gedit maintainer who during the past year has done multiple soname bumps for the gedit libraries, some of whic

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 25.01.25 17:49, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello Andreas, If you do not like those packages in Debian TeX maintainers I can move to Debian Science team (where I care in the same level as described above). No, that's fine with me. I just wanted to clarify your expectations to our group. As you

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Hilmar, Am Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 09:38:37PM +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preusse: > > Now that you created a git repo in our salsa name space and used "Debian TeX > > maintainers " as maintainers address: do > > you expect us to take over maintenance? Or are you going to join us? > > I'm a member of t

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-24 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 24.01.25 Hilmar Preuße (hill...@web.de) wrote: > On 24.01.25 10:17, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello Andreas, > > I'm interested in salvaging your package latexila, in accordance with > > the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1]. > > Your package meets the criteria for

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-24 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 24.01.25 10:17, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello Andreas, I'm interested in salvaging your package latexila, in accordance with the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1]. Your package meets the criteria for this process, and I would love to assist in preserving and ma

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Source: latexila Version: 3.22.0-1.2 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: 910...@bugs.debian.org, Tanguy Ortolo , Debian TeX maintainers , 829...@bugs.debian.org, 948...@bugs.debian.org, 1079...@bugs.debian.org, наб , Package Salvaging Team Hi, I'm interested in salvaging your package latexila,