Quoting Antonio Terceiro (2025-01-25 13:08:09)
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 04:09:47PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2025-01-23 13:30:07)
> > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 06:29:09 +0100 "Alexandre Rossi"
> > > wrote:
> > > > Control: block -1 by 1079857
> > > > > We are
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 04:09:47PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2025-01-23 13:30:07)
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 06:29:09 +0100 "Alexandre Rossi"
> > wrote:
> > > Control: block -1 by 1079857
> > > > We are about to switch the default ruby version to 3.3 in unstabl
Hi,
> > Also, the suggested fix does not build. So this is more complicated
> > that this and this is why an overhaul of the packaging was started.
>
> It built fine for me locally. Could you please share the build log?
>
> Keep in mind that to test this you need ruby-defaults from experimental, w
> Em 23 de jan. de 2025, à(s) 12:30, Alexandre Rossi
> escreveu:
>
> Hi,
>
> The fix is straightforward and is attached to this bug.
This is not the fix that should go in.
We have a packaging overhaul in progress that will make this easier,
just needing binNMU
Hi,
> > > > The fix is straightforward and is attached to this bug.
> > >
> > > This is not the fix that should go in.
> > >
> > > We have a packaging overhaul in progress that will make this easier,
> > > just needing binNMUs.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately src:uwsgi-plugin-ruby is still in the NEW
Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2025-01-23 13:30:07)
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 06:29:09 +0100 "Alexandre Rossi" wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1079857
> > > We are about to switch the default ruby version to 3.3 in unstable
> > > (ruby-defaults/1:3.3~0 is in experimental already for testing), and
> >
6 matches
Mail list logo
