Bug#1092745: opensysusers: DEP17 diversions may delete systemd's systemd-sysuser

2025-01-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 1/13/25 00:16, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Not having multiple implementors of the same functionality just for NIH-reasons, too. Ah, there we go... toxicity starts again. Aren't you guys tired of it? It's been a long time I am. FYI, that's what made me stop working on opensysusers, but I sti

Bug#1092745: opensysusers: DEP17 diversions may delete systemd's systemd-sysuser

2025-01-12 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 08:20:22PM +0100, tho...@goirand.fr wrote: > On Jan 11, 2025 10:09, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > [..] In trixie and > > later, sysusers implementations are no longer coinstallable but mutually > > exclusive. This simplifies the story a lot. I propose mirroring the > > confli

Bug#1092745: opensysusers: DEP17 diversions may delete systemd's systemd-sysuser

2025-01-12 Thread thomas
On Jan 11, 2025 10:09, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Source: opensysusers > Version: 0.7.3-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: loss of systemd files > Tags: patch > User: helm...@debian.org > Usertags: dep17 > > Hi, > > I'm sorry to tell you that I got the DEP17 mitigation for

Bug#1092745: opensysusers: DEP17 diversions may delete systemd's systemd-sysuser

2025-01-11 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: opensysusers Version: 0.7.3-4 Severity: serious Justification: loss of systemd files Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: dep17 Hi, I'm sorry to tell you that I got the DEP17 mitigation for opensysusers wrong. The details are at https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/01/msg0