Hi,
The TC vote ranks A unanimously first (excepting Helmut, who abstained
due to a conflict of interest). The resolution is, therefore, as follows:
In Bug #1091995, the Technical Committe was asked to rule on an issue
that could, under certain circumstances, result in failure of the
base-file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
A > B > C > N
Base-files is the right place for this directory but if there needs to be
some sort of fix, then I prefer B over C.
- Craig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: FlowCrypt Email Encryption 8.5.7
Comment: Seamlessly send and receive
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:59:44PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> A) The Technical Committee affirms that base-files should own all
> top-level filesystem aliases, and packages that conflict with this must
> be patched in Debian to avoid creating any aliases that conflict with
> base-files (ov
Hi,
* Matthew Garrett [2025-02-25 20:59]:
A) The Technical Committee affirms that base-files should own all
top-level filesystem aliases, and packages that conflict with this must
be patched in Debian to avoid creating any aliases that conflict with
base-files (overrules the systemd maintainer,
Hi Matthew (2025.02.25_16:59:44_-0400)
> I call for votes on the below ballot. The vote is open for 7 days, or
> until the outcome is beyond doubt.
>
> In Bug #1091995, the Technical Committe was asked to rule on an issue
> that could, under certain circumstances, result in failure of the
> bas
Re: Matthew Garrett
> A) The Technical Committee affirms that base-files should own all
> top-level filesystem aliases, and packages that conflict with this must
> be patched in Debian to avoid creating any aliases that conflict with
> base-files (overrules the systemd maintainer, requires 3:1 m
Re: Matthew Vernon
> On 26/02/2025 16:38, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Matthew Garrett
> > > B) The Technical Committee requests that base-files create an empty
> > ^^
> > > /usr/lib64 directory, even on architectures that do not use lib64. If
>
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 18:37:09 +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> On 26/02/2025 16:38, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Matthew Garrett
> > > B) The Technical Committee requests that base-files create an empty
> > ^^
> > > /usr/lib64 directory, even on
On 25/02/2025 20:59, Matthew Garrett wrote:
I call for votes on the below ballot. The vote is open for 7 days, or
until the outcome is beyond doubt.
In Bug #1091995, the Technical Committe was asked to rule on an issue
that could, under certain circumstances, result in failure of the
base-file
On 26/02/2025 16:38, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Matthew Garrett
B) The Technical Committee requests that base-files create an empty
^^
/usr/lib64 directory, even on architectures that do not use lib64. If
systemd creates a symlink, this will t
Re: Matthew Garrett
> B) The Technical Committee requests that base-files create an empty
^^
> /usr/lib64 directory, even on architectures that do not use lib64. If
> systemd creates a symlink, this will then match the behaviour of
> base-files
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:59:44PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> In Bug #1091995, the Technical Committe was asked to rule on an issue
> that could, under certain circumstances, result in failure of the
> base-files package to install or upgrade correctly. Under these
> circumstances, systemd
I call for votes on the below ballot. The vote is open for 7 days, or
until the outcome is beyond doubt.
In Bug #1091995, the Technical Committe was asked to rule on an issue
that could, under certain circumstances, result in failure of the
base-files package to install or upgrade correctly. Un
13 matches
Mail list logo
