Hi Dirk,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 09:10:45AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 29 October 2024 at 07:04, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> | Control: found -1 2.7.1+dfsg-5
> |
> | Hi Dirk,
> |
> | Impresinve response time ;-)
>
> Thanks ;-)
>
> Adding an assert was an easy and obvious 'fix' t
On 29 October 2024 at 07:04, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
| Control: found -1 2.7.1+dfsg-5
|
| Hi Dirk,
|
| Impresinve response time ;-)
Thanks ;-)
Adding an assert was an easy and obvious 'fix' to avoid allocating badly as
they had found possible via negative index.
| On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at
Control: found -1 2.7.1+dfsg-5
Hi Dirk,
Impresinve response time ;-)
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 04:12:56PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On 28 October 2024 at 21:55, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> | Source: gsl
> | Version: 2.8+dfsg-3
> | Severity: important
> | Tags: secur
Hi Salvatore,
On 28 October 2024 at 21:55, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
| Source: gsl
| Version: 2.8+dfsg-3
| Severity: important
| Tags: security upstream
| Forwarded: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gsl/2024-09/msg0.html
| X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
|
|
Source: gsl
Version: 2.8+dfsg-3
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gsl/2024-09/msg0.html
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for gsl.
CVE-2024-50610[0]:
| GSL (GNU Scie
5 matches
Mail list logo