Bug#1076924: sendip: FTBFS: sendip.c:282:46: error: ‘SENDIP_LIBS’ undeclared

2024-08-08 Thread Santiago Vila
While we are at it: El 8/8/24 a las 11:54, Jonathan McDowell escribió: When you say "reduced chroot with only build-essential packages", how does this actually differ from a normal sbuild setup? If you are using debootstrap from testing or unstable, there should not be a difference anymore. I

Bug#1076924: sendip: FTBFS: sendip.c:282:46: error: ‘SENDIP_LIBS’ undeclared

2024-08-08 Thread Santiago Vila
reassign 1076924 dpkg-dev affects 1076924 + src:sendip thanks Hello Guillem et al. El 8/8/24 a las 11:54, Jonathan McDowell escribió: On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 12:49:47PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: Package: src:sendip Version: 2.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebu

Bug#1076924: sendip: FTBFS: sendip.c:282:46: error: ‘SENDIP_LIBS’ undeclared

2024-08-08 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 12:49:47PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: src:sendip > Version: 2.6-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Dear maintainer: > > During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: Very confused here. It build fine in my sbuild setup, and I

Bug#1076924: sendip: FTBFS: sendip.c:282:46: error: ‘SENDIP_LIBS’ undeclared

2024-07-24 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:sendip Version: 2.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary dh_update_autoto