On Jul 31, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Marco: Before I go ahead and apply the patch proposed by Helmut, do you have
> any comments?
I have not actually tested it, but everything looks reasonable.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Marco: Before I go ahead and apply the patch proposed by Helmut, do you have
any comments?
Thanks.
Control: tags -1 + patch
Added Md to Cc to have him review the sanity checks.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 08:20:05AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> thanks for the extra information. Especially the history.log contains
> most of the versions at play. I have given it some attempts to reproduce
> the pro
El 18/7/24 a las 9:29, Helmut Grohne escribió:
Accepted. Thanks for notifying me again. I admit I wasn't expecting
multiple problems to reported here. Do you think I should subscribe to
base-files' bug reports to provide faster responses?
One month ago, I would have said "yes, please". But duri
i don't have a backup of the system i just upgraded (which is a rarely
used laptop), but on my desktop i have a full mirror on a secondary
disk, which i didn't update after the last upgrade yet, and here i see
that /lib64 _was_ a symlink ... but it pointed to /lib!?
i won't exclude the possibility
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
thanks for the extra information. Especially the history.log contains
most of the versions at play. I have given it some attempts to reproduce
the problem (in particular going to bookworm, upgrading to your dpkg
version and then completing the dist upgrade to unsta
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:55:12PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the report. I'm hereby forwarding it to
> Helmut Grohne, who did the latest usrmerge changes.
Accepted. Thanks for notifying me again. I admit I wasn't expecting
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 09:37:54AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 04:28:16PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > in the meantime, please provide more details:
> >
> > - full upgrade log
> attached
Thanks.
> > - sources.list and priorities
> > - selected/installed (fo
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 04:28:16PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
in the meantime, please provide more details:
- full upgrade log
attached
- dpkg and apt versions used to upgrade
if i'm reading the log correctly, apt 2.7.6 and dpkg 1.22.1.
- sources.list and priorities
- selected/inst
Hi,
in the meantime, please provide more details:
- full upgrade log
- sources.list and priorities
- selected/installed (foreign) architectures
- dpkg and apt versions used to upgrade
- package versions before the upgrade
Maybe date of the last full upgrade.
Chris
nsaje reenviado --------
Asunto: Bug#1076491: base-files: file clash with libc6
Fecha: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 07:46:14 +0200
De: Oswald Buddenhagen
Responder a: Oswald Buddenhagen ,
1076...@bugs.debian.org
Para: Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: base-files
Version: 13.3
Severity: important
while upgra
Package: base-files
Version: 13.3
Severity: important
while upgrading the system after a rather long time, this happened:
# apt dist-upgrade
...
Unpacking base-files (13.3) over (13) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-fU8xAF/12-base-files_13.3_amd64.deb (--unpack):
trying
12 matches
Mail list logo
