Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2025-01-13 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 5:20 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 at 12:28:10 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I have a USB optical drive and some media, so I can at least do a > > smoke-test on it to get this RC bug fixed, assuming my blank media > > haven't completely delaminated by no

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2025-01-12 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 12/01/2025, Simon McVittie wrote: Normally we keep the patch's upstream authorship when applying patches, So do I when using DEP-3 (Author:) tags, which is my more usual format. (because it looked like you've taken the patch directly from upstream rather than writing any code yourself).

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2025-01-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 at 12:28:10 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I have a USB optical drive and some media, so I can at least do a > smoke-test on it to get this RC bug fixed, assuming my blank media > haven't completely delaminated by now. In fact it doesn't work: with the patch Rebecca found, it c

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2025-01-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 03 Dec 2024 at 17:19:03 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 4:48 PM Rebecca N. Palmer > wrote: > > This applies the above upstream patch to Debian brasero; it builds, but > > that's all the testing it's had. > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/brasero > > The D

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-12-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 03/12/2024 22:19, Jeremy Bícha wrote: The Debian GNOME team uses git formatted patches since they apply more cleanly with our git-buildpackage (gbp pq) workflow, Sorry. Reformatted version here: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/brasero/-/tree/fix1074854v2?ref_type=heads (Still can't

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-12-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 4:48 PM Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > This applies the above upstream patch to Debian brasero; it builds, but > that's all the testing it's had. > > https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/brasero > > (Not a real merge request because the above repository was created with > 'gi

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-12-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This applies the above upstream patch to Debian brasero; it builds, but that's all the testing it's had. https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/brasero (Not a real merge request because the above repository was created with 'git push' and hence isn't officially a fork.)

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-12-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch Upstream fix: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/brasero/-/merge_requests/30/diffs What looks like the actual error is further back than the above log shows: brasero-metadata.c:668:45: error: passing argument 1 of 'gst_install_plugins_async' from incompatible