Bug#1073289: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

2024-08-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 25/07/2024 10:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 17/07/2024 21:56, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:28:04AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 16/07/2024 13:16, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:25:43AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote

Bug#1073289: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

2024-07-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/07/2024 21:56, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:28:04AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 16/07/2024 13:16, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:25:43AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Hi, Hi Stéphane, Le 27/06/2024 à 11:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : The re

Bug#1073289: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

2024-07-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:51:01AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Hi, > > Le 17/07/2024 à 21:56, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > > > Other than that, I'm happy with the current state and we could go ahead. > > > So > > > if you can get those bindings disabled, then I think we can go ahead. > > > > I tr

Bug#1073289: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

2024-07-18 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 17/07/2024 à 21:56, Adrian Bunk a écrit : Other than that, I'm happy with the current state and we could go ahead. So if you can get those bindings disabled, then I think we can go ahead. I tried looking at that, but this "ideally" is in level 15 of the ocaml transition. The bindings a

Bug#1073289: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

2024-07-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:28:04AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 16/07/2024 13:16, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:25:43AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi Stéphane, > > > > > Le 27/06/2024 à 11:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > > > > The remaining un

Bug#1073289: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

2024-07-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 16/07/2024 13:16, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:25:43AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Hi, Hi Stéphane, Le 27/06/2024 à 11:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : The remaining unknowns are llvm-toolchain-{14,15,16,17,18}... [...] I've done a rebuild of the OCaml universe with yes

Bug#1073289: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

2024-07-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:25:43AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Hi, Hi Stéphane, > Le 27/06/2024 à 11:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > > The remaining unknowns are llvm-toolchain-{14,15,16,17,18}... [...] > > I've done a rebuild of the OCaml universe with yesterday's unstable > (mostly). The "

Bug#1073289: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

2024-07-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 27/06/2024 à 11:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : The remaining unknowns are llvm-toolchain-{14,15,16,17,18}... [...] I've done a rebuild of the OCaml universe with yesterday's unstable (mostly). The "missing" packages are the same, but the llvm-toolchain-16 build got far enough to FTBFS

Bug#1073289: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

2024-06-27 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 26/06/2024 à 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : Assuming xen gets fixed, I checked if the rest could be removed: $ dak rm -Rn -s testing approx cairo-ocaml camlimages camltemplate coinst cothreads cryptgps facile frama-c gd4o hlins hol-light lablgl ledit mcl14 misery mlpcap nproc