Bug#1069450: Follow up on bug #1069450

2025-03-11 Thread Shengqi Chen
Hi, > 2025年3月5日 09:49,Shengqi Chen 写道: > > I will upload a new version with patched cmake call, i.e.: > > CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} ${CPPFLAGS}” cmake -DUNIT_TESTING=1 > -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON .. It works as intended, and tests on armhf and armel are passing again :). But as you said, this certa

Bug#1069450: Follow up on bug #1069450

2025-03-04 Thread Shengqi Chen
Hi Simon, > 2025年3月4日 19:14,Simon Josefsson 写道: > > I have uploaded 1.4.4-2 with your patch as the only change, let's see > what happens. Thank you for your prompt response. 1.4.4-2, however, is still failing autopkgtest on armel / armhf. Miao Wang pointed out that it is due to cmake not readi

Bug#1069450: Follow up on bug #1069450

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Josefsson
The 1.4.4-1 upload fails the same way in debci on armel+armhf, as expected, but now we got more debug info to look at: https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/socket-wrapper/testing/armel/58455649/ https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/socket-wrapper/testing/armhf/58455579/ Compare with working amd64 and i38

Bug#1069450: Follow up on bug #1069450

2025-03-03 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 14:38 +, Chen Shengqi wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Simon Josefsson > > > > Thanks for working on this!  It is a bit delicate issue, and I've > > been > > unable to find the right spell to fix things.  Could you propose > > this as > > a

Bug#1069450: Follow up on bug #1069450

2025-03-03 Thread Simon Josefsson
Andrew Bartlett writes: > On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 14:38 +, Chen Shengqi wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Simon Josefsson >> > >> > Thanks for working on this!  It is a bit delicate issue, and I've >> > been >> > unable to find the right spell to fix things. 

Bug#1069450: Follow up on bug #1069450

2025-03-03 Thread Simon Josefsson
I'm not certain this is the right approach, but we should do what it takes to get the package into trixie. I started with an upload of 1.4.4-1 that makes the build logs a bit more verbose, which may help to debug things more. Assuming debci still breaks, let's try your patch. Salsa pipelines has

Bug#1069450: Follow up on bug #1069450

2025-03-03 Thread Chen Shengqi
Hi Simon, > -Original Message- > From: Simon Josefsson > > Thanks for working on this! It is a bit delicate issue, and I've been > unable to find the right spell to fix things. Could you propose this as > a Salsa merge request, or at least a concrete patch? It would indeed be > nice t

Bug#1069450: Follow up on bug #1069450

2025-03-03 Thread Simon Josefsson
Thanks for working on this! It is a bit delicate issue, and I've been unable to find the right spell to fix things. Could you propose this as a Salsa merge request, or at least a concrete patch? It would indeed be nice to get this fixed and uploaded. /Simon Chen Shengqi writes: > (Resend to

Bug#1069450: Follow up on bug #1069450

2025-03-01 Thread Chen Shengqi
(Resend to BTS only, since my last mail got rejected.) -Original Message- To: 1069...@bugs.debian.org; Andrew Bartlett ; Lucas Nussbaum ; Luca Boccassi ; Simon Josefsson ; Helge Deller Hi all, socket-wrapper still fails its tests on armel and armhf, also blocking its (and all dependen