Bug#1061775: shlibs is stricter than it needs to be

2024-01-29 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 06:42:41PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Hmmm, my understanding might be wrong, but when using dh_makeshlibs > directly without a symbols file, isn't it going to be a problem if > a program is built against libzstd 1.5.5 and it uses the new > ZSTD_CCtx_setFParams() function

Bug#1061775: shlibs is stricter than it needs to be

2024-01-29 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:58:47PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > Package: libzstd-dev > Version: 1.5.5+dfsg2-2 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > debian/rules contains > > dh_makeshlibs -plibzstd1 -V'libzstd1 (>= 1.5.5)' --add-udeb=libzstd1-udeb > > Would it be possible to change it to 1.5

Bug#1061775: shlibs is stricter than it needs to be

2024-01-29 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Package: libzstd-dev Version: 1.5.5+dfsg2-2 Severity: normal Hi, debian/rules contains dh_makeshlibs -plibzstd1 -V'libzstd1 (>= 1.5.5)' --add-udeb=libzstd1-udeb Would it be possible to change it to 1.5.4? I don't see anything between 1.5.4 and 1.5.5 that would mean 1.5.5-built packages wouldn