Bug#1058079: tar: diff for NMU version 1.34+dfsg-1.3

2023-12-13 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Janos, On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 04:36:44PM +0100, Janos LENART wrote: > Thank you. There is no need for delay. You are fast :). Ok then I will reschedule it to upload directly. As the issue is not warranting a DSA from our perspective I was considering to just as well propose bookworm-pu (and may

Bug#1058079: tar: diff for NMU version 1.34+dfsg-1.3

2023-12-13 Thread Janos LENART
That sounds good to me. Thanks for your help. On Wed, 13 Dec 2023, 16:41 Salvatore Bonaccorso, wrote: > Janos, > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 04:36:44PM +0100, Janos LENART wrote: > > Thank you. There is no need for delay. > > You are fast :). Ok then I will reschedule it to upload directly. > > As

Bug#1058079: tar: diff for NMU version 1.34+dfsg-1.3

2023-12-13 Thread Janos LENART
Thank you. There is no need for delay. On Wed, 13 Dec 2023, 16:36 Salvatore Bonaccorso, wrote: > Control: tags 1058079 + patch > Control: tags 1058079 + pending > > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for tar (versioned as 1.34+dfsg-1.3) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free t

Bug#1058079: tar: diff for NMU version 1.34+dfsg-1.3

2023-12-13 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags 1058079 + patch Control: tags 1058079 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for tar (versioned as 1.34+dfsg-1.3) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. MR as well in https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tar/-/merge_requests/5 R