Hey.
Yes, one can expect, that people know which firewall they use, but not that
fail2ban rather silently switches from previously iptables to nftables.
Especially also as fail2ban seems to fail silently (I'm mean it's in the logs,
but one cannot really expect people to read them without reason)
Hello,
Not sure I agree with the change of severity. If you are using such
tools, you should know
which firewall you have installed.
What do you think we should do ? for the install of nftables?
Thanks
S
Le 31/08/2024 à 02:01, Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit :
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: severity -1 grave
Hey.
I'd say this one is also at least grave (it breaks the sensible use of
fail2ban itself) or rather even critical (as fail2ban is used for
security purposes).
The package recommends either iptables/nftalbes (which I guess is in
principle good, because people should
Package: fail2ban
X-Debbugs-Cc: bmeirel...@gmail.com
Version: 1.0.2-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
He creates the chain in iptables, but doesn't add the banned IPs. I
switched to using nftables, and it's working correctly."
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.1
APT prefers sta
4 matches
Mail list logo
