On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 08:00:43AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hm, after fiddling for a few minutes I can't quite work it out. What
> happens when you build it locally?
Locally I also don't see these files being created, so the updated
package has the same contents as version in unstable.
--
Vale
Valentin Vidic wrote:
> Not sure why would reproducible build have these files included?
Hm, after fiddling for a few minutes I can't quite work it out. What
happens when you build it locally?
It's not as if the testsuite is not being run on the buildd's, as we
can see that it is. For example:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that
> dacite could not be built reproducibly.
>
> This is because it shipped a bunch of nondeterminstic ~temporary build
> files in the binary package, such as benchmarks
Source: dacite
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that
dacite could not be built reprodu
4 matches
Mail list logo
