Hi Lucas,
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:57 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 08/08/23 at 06:42 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi Baptiste,
> >
> > On 07/08/23 at 22:07 +0200, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> > > Hi Lucas,
> > >
> > > On 2023-08-03 10:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > duck-as-a-service (d
On 08/08/23 at 06:42 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> On 07/08/23 at 22:07 +0200, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > On 2023-08-03 10:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > duck-as-a-service (duck.debian.net) has been broken for a long time,
> > > and
> > > the corresponding U
Hi Baptiste,
On 07/08/23 at 22:07 +0200, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On 2023-08-03 10:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > duck-as-a-service (duck.debian.net) has been broken for a long time,
> > and
> > the corresponding UDD importer is broken as well (see #949009,
> > #963887).
> > In the
Hi Lucas,
On 2023-08-03 10:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> duck-as-a-service (duck.debian.net) has been broken for a long time,
> and
> the corresponding UDD importer is broken as well (see #949009,
> #963887).
> In the meantime, duck continued evolving (was rewritten?) and is now
> checking a lot mor
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
duck-as-a-service (duck.debian.net) has been broken for a long time, and
the corresponding UDD importer is broken as well (see #949009, #963887).
In the meantime, duck continued evolving (was rewritten?
5 matches
Mail list logo