Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

2023-05-10 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 10:12:01 +0800, Bo YU wrote: > If you talk about the baseline ABI according to hardware, yeah, this > is still open. > Thanks for more background here. I thought this might lead to a wider > discussion before solid ABI as pabs' suggestion. Given the ongoing discussion,

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

2023-04-29 Thread Bo YU
Hi! Sorry for the later reply. On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:30 AM Jessica Clarke wrote: > > On 26 Apr 2023, at 17:22, Bo YU wrote: > > > > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 02:08:33PM -0400, Darius Rad wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:52:52PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 0

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

2023-04-26 Thread Jessica Clarke
On 26 Apr 2023, at 17:22, Bo YU wrote: > > Hi, > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 02:08:33PM -0400, Darius Rad wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:52:52PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:22:49AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > > I thought the riscv32 has met the request[2]

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

2023-04-26 Thread Bo YU
Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 02:08:33PM -0400, Darius Rad wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:52:52PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:22:49AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > I thought the riscv32 has met the request[2] also. > > I assume the ABI is set in stone and well defined. >

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

2023-04-25 Thread Darius Rad
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:52:52PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:22:49AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > > > I thought the riscv32 has met the request[2] also. > > > > I assume the ABI is set in stone and well defined. > > There are three ABIs for 32-bit RISC-V. They ar

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

2023-04-25 Thread Bo YU
Hi! On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:22:49AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: Hi! support this. Is your intention to create such port (unofficially or officially in Debian)? Yeah, I am trying to do such port and I guess riscv32 ends up in the debian-port given the troubles that 32-bit systems present

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

2023-04-24 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2023-04-25, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 23:20:01 +0800, Bo YU wrote: >> Currently riscv32 has been supported upstream for a while[0] and people >> can setup a riscv32 qemu with yocto[1], but it is time consuming. >> There is no distro to support riscv32 AFAIK until now however I

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

2023-04-24 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 23:20:01 +0800, Bo YU wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.21 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: riscv32 > Currently riscv32 has been supported upstream for a while[0] and people > can setup a riscv32 qemu with yocto[1]

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

2023-04-23 Thread Bo YU
Package: dpkg Version: 1.21.21 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Usertags: riscv32 Dear Maintainer, Currently riscv32 has been supported upstream for a while[0] and people can setup a riscv32 qemu with yocto[1], but it is time consuming. There is no distro to supp