On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:03:11AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 08:24:40AM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
>> This was fixed in 9.8y-2 (closing #1029956).
>
>This is partially correct. The bug was closed. The actual problem was
>fixed at the root indeed. But this really wasn't f
- Original Message -
| From: "Brendan O'Dea"
| To: "Helmut Grohne" , 1032...@bugs.debian.org
| Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 4:24:40 PM
| Subject: Bug#1032651: vile FTCBFS: broken cross-compilation specific autoconf
test
| tags 1032651 unreproducible
| thanks
|
Control: tags -1 - unreproducible
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 08:24:40AM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> This was fixed in 9.8y-2 (closing #1029956).
This is partially correct. The bug was closed. The actual problem was
fixed at the root indeed. But this really wasn't fixed in practice and I
faile
tags 1032651 unreproducible
thanks
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 12:24:26PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>Source: vile
>Version: 9.8y-2
>
>vile fails to cross build from source, because the cross-compilation
>specific test contains a syntax error. This will become obvious once
>looking at the attached pa
Source: vile
Version: 9.8y-2
Tags: patch upstream
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
vile fails to cross build from source, because the cross-compilation
specific test contains a syntax error. This will become obvious once
looking at the attached patch. Thus it fails to define GE
5 matches
Mail list logo