Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

Quoting José Miguel Gonçalves (2024-09-06 18:38:28) > On 06/09/24 17:27, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Please subscribe to our mailinglist and discuss more there, and please > > join our Salsa team - see details athttps://wiki.debian.org/Teams/VoIP/ > > I'm a long time subscriber from your mailingli

Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

On 06/09/24 17:27, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Please subscribe to our mailinglist and discuss more there, and please join our Salsa team - see details athttps://wiki.debian.org/Teams/VoIP/ I'm a long time subscriber from your mailinglist... and I've just applied for a Salsa account.

Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

Quoting José Miguel Gonçalves (2024-09-06 18:11:57) > On 06/09/24 16:35, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I can do the task of releasing patches-applied updates, so you need not > > be an official Debian developer to help. All you need is dedication to > > keep an eye on stable and oldstable branches o

Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

On 06/09/24 16:35, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I can do the task of releasing patches-applied updates, so you need not be an official Debian developer to help. All you need is dedication to keep an eye on stable and oldstable branches of Debian, and the ability to*try* to apply patches. If you not

Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

Quoting José Miguel Gonçalves (2024-09-06 16:37:28) > I was thinking that it would be possible to go directly from unstable to > backports. Quoting from https://backports.debian.org/: "(In a few cases, > usually for security updates, backports are also created from the Debian > unstable distribu

Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

Hi Jonas, I was thinking that it would be possible to go directly from unstable to backports. Quoting from https://backports.debian.org/: "(In a few cases, usually for security updates, backports are also created from the Debian unstable distribution.)". If Asterisk does not fit in that catego

Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

Quoting José Miguel Gonçalves (2024-09-06 15:29:12) > Thank you for your quick response. > Please do not consider my questions as I was demanding anything. I did not. In fact, I appreciate knowing that others benefit from my maintenance work, even if it only reaches unstable Debian. > Going to

Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

Hi Jonas, Thank you for your quick response. Please do not consider my questions as I was demanding anything. I just wanted a confirmation that Asterisk was still going to be packaged in Debian in the near future (at least, during the life of Asterisk 20). I only have appreciations for the Debi

Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

Hi José, Quoting José Miguel Gonçalves (2024-09-06 13:14:26) > I was wondering, what is the current maintenance status of Asterisk on > Debian? Nothing has changed since my older responses in this bugreport, so please read my other posts here and ask more specifically if there is something you d

Bug#1031046: Backport to bookworm

Hi all, I was wondering, what is the current maintenance status of Asterisk on Debian? I see that there are packages published on unstable, but the current version has a reported security vulnerability (CVE-2024-42365 ) since August 1