Hi Marc,
On 09-12-2022 19:34, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 01:02:45PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
And right after hitting the send button I realized that my reasoning is at
least partially flawed. The testbed will always update glibc, because the
testbed is build from testing, and gl
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 01:02:45PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> And right after hitting the send button I realized that my reasoning is at
> least partially flawed. The testbed will always update glibc, because the
> testbed is build from testing, and glibc hasn't migrated yet. Still, it's a
> weird
Hi,
On 01-12-2022 12:57, Paul Gevers wrote:
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package because it
showed up in the glibc regressions. I noticed that it regularly fails on
s390x [1] for the first try to test glibc (same happened at least once
on i386 too). The retry one day late
Source: sudo
Version: 1.9.10-3
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: gl...@packages.debian.org openl...@package.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Control: affects -1 src:glibc slapd
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package because it
s
4 matches
Mail list logo
