Thanks again for the VERY quick response!
On 10/9/22 15:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
Pardon my ignorance of the finer points of autopkgtest but is there a
way to get more-verbose logging?
I started it with --shell-fail. That gave me a shell on the first test
that failed and I could then easily co
Hi Olek,
On 09-10-2022 21:37, Olek Wojnar wrote:
I have just started the test on one of our workers manually and I can
confirm that the patches are all applied.
Pardon my ignorance of the finer points of autopkgtest but is there a
way to get more-verbose logging?
I started it with --shell-f
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the quick reply and the troubleshooting!
On 10/6/22 16:14, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Olek,
On 06-10-2022 22:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 06-10-2022 21:38, Olek Wojnar wrote:
It's entirely possible that this is also a problem in may package,
which is
why I have the test suite the
Hi Olek,
On 06-10-2022 22:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 06-10-2022 21:38, Olek Wojnar wrote:
It's entirely possible that this is also a problem in may package,
which is
why I have the test suite there in the first place. However, I have
not been
able to discover a reason why the tests run correct
Hi Olek,
On 06-10-2022 21:38, Olek Wojnar wrote:
It's entirely possible that this is also a problem in may package, which is
why I have the test suite there in the first place. However, I have not been
able to discover a reason why the tests run correctly on amd64 but fail,
exactly as they did b
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 5.25
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I noticed some autopkgtest failures [1][2][3] in a recent package upload. I
also noticed that the amd64 build [4] was consistently successful. In
addition, the autopkgtest that I run automatically during my build process
(also o
6 matches
Mail list logo
