Hello everyone,
In case anyone is interested in ZFS packages:
I created a bit hacky way to package ZFS binary modules for Debian 12
which uses dkms mktarball --binaries-only underneath.
If someone wants to take a look the package is on GitHub:
https://github.com/fihufil/debian-zfs-modules
It
Hi everyone,
On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 13:04:04 +0300 Jaak Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt
wrote:
> With the new upstream version arriving in unstable, it is not clear what
> is now the proper way to create binary-only module packages, for
> example?
Now it reached stable/bookworm ...
I just ran into it and a
Package: dkms
Version: 2.8.4-3
Followup-For: Bug #1009179
I'd like to also signal that I'm interested in keeping this
functionality around. I looked at the current dkms source and it's not
*that* complicatd. It's basically one (rather big, 100 lines) shell
function which does everything.
Also, it
The commit message for
https://github.com/dell/dkms/commit/68b083eaa3f71c166adfece8e4f760e0cdf96185
says:
"Distributions know much better than us, what is the proper
way to package a DKMS module. Remove in-tree, semi-constantly
out-of-date code."
and a comment on https://github.com/
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/dell/dkms/issues
On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 13:04:04 +0300 Jaak Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt
wrote:
Package: dkms
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
It appears that dkms upstream has removed support for mkdeb, mkdsc and
mkbmdeb --
Package: dkms
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
It appears that dkms upstream has removed support for mkdeb, mkdsc and
mkbmdeb --
https://github.com/dell/dkms/commit/68b083eaa3f71c166adfece8e4f760e0cdf96185
>From that commit one can't really see if there have b
6 matches
Mail list logo
