Hi,
On 20-02-2022 11:04, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
That's great to know. Could you retry runc's autopkgtest on
ci-worker13. If it succeeds, can we close this bug?
I hit the retry button three times, two of those were executed on
ci-worker13 and all three passed.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Descript
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 6:00 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 20-02-2022 09:20, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > It's because ci-worker13 still runs on the buster kernel.
> >
> > Any chance we can upgrade ci-worker13 to bullseye? So we can have a
> > consistent testbed. Otherwise I can work around tha
Hi,
On 20-02-2022 09:20, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
It's because ci-worker13 still runs on the buster kernel.
Any chance we can upgrade ci-worker13 to bullseye? So we can have a
consistent testbed. Otherwise I can work around that by disabling
relevant failed tests.
That wasn't possible until a cou
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 4:39 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Source: runc
> Version: 1.1.0+ds1-1
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Tags: sid bookworm
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: flaky
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> I looked at the results of the autopkgtest
Source: runc
Version: 1.1.0+ds1-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on amd64
because with a recent upload of glibc the autopk
5 matches
Mail list logo
