Hi,
On 16-03-2022 22:18, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
The problem is that it did not migrated yet, some regressions were reported.
If you mean autopkgtest regressions found by ci, than those should be
dealt with now.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Em 16/03/2022 17:20, Paul Gevers escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> On 07-03-2022 23:36, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
>> I uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0+1 removing ruby2.7 support.
>
> Thanks for that. It looked like the transition was nearly over, but
> britney (rightfully) refuses to remove src:ruby2.7. It took m
Hi,
On 07-03-2022 23:36, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
I uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0+1 removing ruby2.7 support.
Thanks for that. It looked like the transition was nearly over, but
britney (rightfully) refuses to remove src:ruby2.7. It took me some
time, but it's because some packages depend on ru
Hi Paul,
Em 06/03/2022 17:58, Paul Gevers escreveu:
Hi
On 27-02-2022 14:07, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
The fix for that is probably non-trivial, so IMO we should remove
diaspora-installer from testing to let the transition complete.
diaspora-installer was removed, and ruby-defaults migrated to
Hi
On 27-02-2022 14:07, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
The fix for that is probably non-trivial, so IMO we should remove
diaspora-installer from testing to let the transition complete.
diaspora-installer was removed, and ruby-defaults migrated to testing.
Under the assumption that you haven't seen a
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 08:56:49AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Thanks for taking care.
>
> On 24-02-2022 02:43, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > diaspora-installer can just be removed, it's already on the autoremoval
> > > list.
> >
> > also fails without the new ruby-defaults.
>
>
Hi Antonio,
Thanks for taking care.
On 24-02-2022 02:43, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
diaspora-installer can just be removed, it's already on the autoremoval
list.
also fails without the new ruby-defaults.
I'm not seeing that. The 2022-02-24 01:38:19 UTC reference run on amd64
passed.
I retr
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 02:30:15PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18-02-2022 21:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > > Also the autopkgtest regressions don't look pretty yet, did you
> > > > already have a look:
> > > > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-defaults
> > > I'll try to take
Hi,
On 18-02-2022 21:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
Also the autopkgtest regressions don't look pretty yet, did you
already have a look:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-defaults
I'll try to take a look at this list and see what's going on.
coderay seems to have a patch to fix this in
Hi,
On 18-02-2022 21:18, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=graphviz
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hivex
I am not sure about graphviz
Sorry, my mistake. I didn't schedule this one (yet) because of libwebp7.
but for hivex I submitted a MR t
Hi,
Em 18/02/2022 16:43, Paul Gevers escreveu:
Hi Lucas, Antonio,
On 17-02-2022 20:11, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0 to unstable, it should be
available soon.
I started scheduling jobs. I already noticed some that *didn't* pick
up the new dependency, can you hav
Hi Lucas, Antonio,
On 17-02-2022 20:11, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0 to unstable, it should be available
soon.
I started scheduling jobs. I already noticed some that *didn't* pick up
the new dependency, can you have a look:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/packa
Em 17/02/2022 12:09, Paul Gevers escreveu:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 17-02-2022 13:42, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
Can I prepare a ruby-defaults upload targeting unstable just
switching the default to ruby3.0 and keeping ruby2.7?
Please go ahead.
I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0 to unst
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 17-02-2022 13:42, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
Can I prepare a ruby-defaults upload targeting unstable just switching
the default to ruby3.0 and keeping ruby2.7?
Please go ahead.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 17-02-2022 13:42, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
Can I prepare a ruby-defaults upload targeting unstable just switching
the default to ruby3.0 and keeping ruby2.7?
I first want to see the new tracker packages (should be available soon,
but I'm not sure I have time until this evening to look).
Hi,
Em 17/02/2022 09:33, Paul Gevers escreveu:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby3.0-default.html
Hi Antonio, Lucas
On 15-02-2022 21:31, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
I saw that this was already added to the list of planned transitions,
thanks for that. accordin
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby3.0-default.html
Hi Antonio, Lucas
On 15-02-2022 21:31, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
I saw that this was already added to the list of planned transitions,
thanks for that. according to
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:59:30AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> We would like to add ruby3.0 as the default and remove ruby2.7 support.
>
> Ben file:
>
> title
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
We would like to add ruby3.0 as the default and remove ruby2.7 support.
Ben file:
title = "ruby2.7-rm";
is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7/ | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~
/^
19 matches
Mail list logo
