Bug#1003395: plfit FTBFS on s390x

2024-08-03 Thread Jerome BENOIT
reopen 1003395 retitle plfit: under-the-radar numerical issue Hi, I am re-opening the issue because it has simply gone under the radar but it is still there. The issue is a numerical issue that deserves an appropriate numerical analysis. The upstream code currently workarounds by using at some

Bug#1003395: plfit FTBFS on s390x

2024-08-03 Thread Santiago Vila
close 1003395 0.9.5+ds-1 thanks Hello. This was fixed upstream and there is apparently no need to apply any patch anymore. I've written the long explanation in the github issue: https://github.com/ntamas/plfit/issues/38 TLDR: It was fixed by the line in src/CMakeLists.txt saying this: target

Bug#1003395: plfit FTBFS on s390x

2022-02-25 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Control: tags -1 + patch As already indicated in https://github.com/ntamas/plfit/issues/38 the problem is related to the size of long double. The appended debdiff solved the problem on Ubuntu Jammy by forcing long double to 64bit. Best regards Heinrichdiff -Nru plfit-0.9.3+ds/debian/change

Bug#1003395: plfit FTBFS on s390x

2022-01-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ntamas/plfit/issues/38 The issue is actually discussed upstream even before this bug was filed.

Bug#1003395: plfit FTBFS on s390x

2022-01-09 Thread Peter Michael Green
Package: plfit Severity: important x-debbugs-cc: igr...@packages.debian.org tags: ftbfs plfit FTBFS on s390x with test failures. 2: Test command: /<>/_BUILD_SHARED/test/test_continuous 2: Test timeout computed to be: 1000 1: ./test/test_discrete.c:39 : expected -9155.62809000, got -14282.71