Hi all,
The following Patch on top of a 4.19.208 is working in our test system
since Jan 5.
cheerio
Steve
Am 27.01.22 um 22:59 schrieb Florian Westphal:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 06:26:10PM +0100, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The patch
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 06:26:10PM +0100, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The patch made its way to mainline / latest
> >
> > Any chance to get it backported to 4.19?
>
> It would be need to have a backport sent sta...@vger.kernel.org . Once
>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 06:26:10PM +0100, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The patch made its way to mainline / latest
>
> Any chance to get it backported to 4.19?
It would be need to have a backport sent sta...@vger.kernel.org . Once
it lands in the older stable series, we can includ
Hi all,
The patch made its way to mainline / latest
Any chance to get it backported to 4.19?
> From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
>
> [ Upstream commit 4e1860a3863707e8177329c006d10f9e37e097a8 ]
>
> IP fragments do not come with the transport header, hence skip bogus
> layer 4 checksum updates.
>
> Fixes
Hi!
>> Regarding 4.19, the patch does not work there since the struct pkt does
>> not have a member fragoff. I suppose this is hidden deeply in the skbuf
>> structure...
> Sad. You might ask the maintainers if they can consider the fix as
> well for older stable series, mentioneing back the one you
Hi Steffen,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 05:35:11PM +0100, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
>
> Am 04.01.22 um 17:31 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> > Awesome. Can you confirm that as well on the upstrem thread, so i
> > guess the maintainers will finalize the change for inclusion in
> > mainline?
>
> For 5.
Am 04.01.22 um 17:31 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> Awesome. Can you confirm that as well on the upstrem thread, so i
> guess the maintainers will finalize the change for inclusion in
> mainline?
For 5.16 I did.
Regarding 4.19, the patch does not work there since the struct pkt does
not have a
Hi Steffen,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:46:30PM +0100, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
> Hi
>
> The following patch did resolve the issue for me on 5.16.0-rc8. I will
> also test it on 4.19.0-*-amd64 as soon as I have a working build env for
> a buster kernel..
Awesome. Can you confirm that as well on t
Hi
The following patch did resolve the issue for me on 5.16.0-rc8. I will
also test it on 4.19.0-*-amd64 as soon as I have a working build env for
a buster kernel..
cheerio
Steve
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Re: nftables stateless NAT in raw table mangles fragmen
9 matches
Mail list logo
