Dima Kogan writes:
> /bin/sh: 1: test: =: unexpected operator
For whatever reason, I didn't run into that one; I'll look into it.
Thanks for pointing it out and for confirming that all is otherwise
well.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~a
Hi Aaron. Thank you for looking at this. I'm trying to build the latest
as of right now (8acc5c51eb81d701a36df1d5b9466b1df9ef9f2c). I see this:
$ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -b
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package fltk1.3
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 1.3.8-1
...
dh_auto_cle
u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
> Only in the context of package builds; in other contexts (ad-hoc builds
> against system FLTK), it's currently entirely possible to have only
> libfltk1.3-dev installed. I could perhaps downgrade the dependency to a
> recommendation, but I don't think it
Dima Kogan writes:
> I forgot to mention: dpkg-dev is in build-essential and it's
> Architecture:all, so there's no reason to add the dependency. It's
> guaranteed to be installed.
Only in the context of package builds; in other contexts (ad-hoc builds
against system FLTK), it's currently entire
> I reckon I'll also need to throw in a runtime dependency on
> dpkg-dev:any, but that should be straightforward and uncontroversial.
I forgot to mention: dpkg-dev is in build-essential and it's
Architecture:all, so there's no reason to add the dependency. It's
guaranteed to be installed.
Dima Kogan writes:
> Here's a patch to handle fltk-config.
Got it, thanks!
> I don't use cmake, so would like to not touch FLTK-Targets-none.cmake.
> Can you do that?
Sure, I'll look into it. I reckon I'll also need to throw in a runtime
dependency on dpkg-dev:any, but that should be straight
Hi.
Here's a patch to handle fltk-config.
I don't use cmake, so would like to not touch FLTK-Targets-none.cmake.
Can you do that?
Thanks
>From b6c84bc2864913c48eb4db54bf4f75d62759770c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dima Kogan
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 14:38:48 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] "fltk-config"
Dima Kogan writes:
> It would be nice if it was Multi-Arch:same. It would make cross-building
> easier. Is there any reason it isn't? I see that it ships
> /usr/bin/fltk-config, which would need to be moved to a different
> package, maybe. Do you want a patch?
Thanks for the suggestion. There i
Package: libfltk1.3-dev
Version: 1.3.5-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Dima Kogan
It would be nice if it was Multi-Arch:same. It would make cross-building
easier. Is there any reason it isn't? I see that it ships
/usr/bin/fltk-config, which would need to be moved to a different
package, ma
9 matches
Mail list logo
