Bug#1060023: ITP: keyd -- Keyboard key remapping daemon for Linux

Control: tags -1 pending   Package is now in NEW.

Bug#1057689: minetest: calls home for upstream version check

NABLE_UPDATE_CHECKER=0 to cmake. > You don't  > need to patch defaultsettings.cpp or minetest.conf   https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/minetest/-/commit/8513344575e5d5959d2e42d6681cd96cc6ded3fe   Cheers, tobi

Bug#737796: may be use the newly proposed License-grant field

Am Dienstag, den 19.09.2017, 08:21 +0200 schrieb Dominique Dumont: > On Monday, 18 September 2017 22:48:30 CEST you wrote: > > I like this new feature and would be in favour making it real. > > err, I'm not sure which new feature you refer to .. :-/ > > Do you mean the "support Files: paragraph w

Bug#736038: photoprint: diff for NMU version 0.4.2~pre2-2.3

Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for photoprint (versioned as 0.4.2~pre2-2.3). The diff is attached to this message. Regards. diff -Nru photoprint-0.4.2~pre2/debian/changelog photoprint-0.4.2~pre2/debian/changelog --- photoprint-0.4.2~pre2/debian/changelog 2014-08-11 20:54:09.000

Bug#756942: lcms: diff for NMU version 1.19.dfsg2-1.5

Package: lcms Version: 1.19.dfsg1-1.4 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for lcms (versioned as 1.19.dfsg2-1.5) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru lcms-1.19.dfsg1/debian/changelog lcms-

Bug#745530: cegui-mk2: diff for NMU version 0.7.6-3.3

tags 745530 + patch tags 745530 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for cegui-mk2 (versioned as 0.7.6-3.3) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru cegui-mk2-0.7.6/debian/changelog cegui-mk2-0.7.6/debian/changelo

Bug#699304: libmng: diff for NMU version 1.0.10+dfsg-3.1

tags 699304 + patch tags 699304 + pending tags 745525 + patch tags 745525 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libmng (versioned as 1.0.10+dfsg-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- tobi Binary files

Bug#736040: prima: diff for NMU version 1.28-1.3

tags 736040 + patch tags 736040 + pending tags 752805 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for prima (versioned as 1.28-1.3) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -u prima-1.28/debian/changelog prima-1.28/debian/cha

Bug#638424: aspell-it: diff for NMU version 2.4-20070901-0-2.1

tags 638424 + patch tags 638424 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for aspell-it (versioned as 2.4-20070901-0-2.1) and will ask ask my sponsor to uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- Tobi diff -Nru aspell-i

Bug#741600: 389-ds-base: diff for NMU version 1.3.2.9-1.1

tags 741600 + patch tags 741600 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for 389-ds-base (versioned as 1.3.2.9-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru 389-ds-base-1.3.2.9/debian/changelog 389-ds-base-1.3.2.9/de

Bug#731018: smc: diff for NMU version 1.9+git20121121-1.1

tags 731018 + patch tags 731018 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for smc (versioned as 1.9+git20121121-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru smc-1.9+git20121121/debian/changelog smc-1.9+git20121121/de

Bug#731019: cegui-mk2: diff for NMU version 0.7.6-3.1

tags 731019 + patch tags 731019 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for cegui-mk2 (versioned as 0.7.6-3.1) and will ask my sponsor to uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru cegui-mk2-0.7.6/debian/changelog cegui-mk

Bug#734974: prima: diff for NMU version 1.28-1.2

Package: prima Version: 1.28-1.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for prima (versioned as 1.28-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -u prima-1.28/debian/changelog prima-1.28/debian/chan

Bug#595553:

Intending to adopt the package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#721271: python-drizzle: diff for NMU version 1.0-3.2

tags 721271 + patch tags 721271 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for python-drizzle (versioned as 1.0-3.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru python-drizzle-1.0/debian/changelog python-drizzle-1.0/debi

Bug#691929: libapache2-mod-fcgid: diff for NMU version 1:2.3.6-1.2

tags 691929 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libapache2-mod-fcgid (versioned as 1:2.3.6-1.2) and asked my sponsor to uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -u libapache2-mod-fcgid-2.3.6/debian/changelog libapac

Bug#691271: lvm2: diff for NMU version 2.02.95-4.1

Am Sonntag, den 18.11.2012, 13:52 +0100 schrieb Bastian Blank: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:27:12PM +0100, t...@coldtobi.de wrote: > > I've prepared an NMU for lvm2 (versioned as 2.02.95-4.1) and > > will be uploaded via my sponsor to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me > > if I > > should delay

Bug#691271: lvm2: diff for NMU version 2.02.95-4.1

Update: s/UNRELEASED/unstable. diff -Nru lvm2-2.02.95/debian/changelog lvm2-2.02.95/debian/changelog --- lvm2-2.02.95/debian/changelog 2012-05-27 19:05:43.0 +0200 +++ lvm2-2.02.95/debian/changelog 2012-11-18 12:29:14.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +lvm2 (2.02.95-4.1) unstable

Bug#691271: lvm2: diff for NMU version 2.02.95-4.1

tags 691271 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for lvm2 (versioned as 2.02.95-4.1) and will be uploaded via my sponsor to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru lvm2-2.02.95/debian/changelog lvm2-2.02.95/debian/changelog --- lvm

Bug#664927: python-drizzle: diff for NMU version 1.0-3.1

tags 664927 + patch tags 664927 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for python-drizzle (versioned as 1.0-3.1) and I will upload it (via sponsor) to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru python-drizzle-1.0/debian/changelog pytho

Bug#665363: sqlite3: diff for NMU version 3.7.11-2.1

tags 665363 + pending thanks [Replace XX with correct value] Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for sqlite3 (versioned as 3.7.11-2.1) and will upload (via sponsor) to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru sqlite3-3.7.11/debian/changelog sqlite

Bug#620647: kumofs: diff for NMU version 0.4.13-1.1

tags 620647 + patch tags 620647 + pending tags 640602 + patch tags 640602 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for kumofs (versioned as 0.4.13-1.1) and will ask my sponsor to uploaded it to the DELAYED queue. Regards. diff -Nru kumofs-0.4.13/debian/changelog kumofs-0.4.13/debi

Bug#659518: Changes to CVS

Dear mentors, Pierre Habouzit (the former maintainer) uploaded the changes to the VCS. (http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/tokyocabinet.git;a=summary) So DDs, please go ahead and please sponsor the upload. Best regards, coldtobi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-re

Bug#659718: override: drizzle/database/extra, drizzle-plugin-auth-pam/database/extra, drizzle-client/database/optional

Package: ftp.debian.org Hallo, please correct the overrides as indicated. Priority Updates: The new priorities have been calculated (using a script) to be compliant with Policy 2.5. The maximimum priority allowed is: drizzle-plugin-auth-pamextra drizzle-client o

Bug#641012: misidentifies hungarian text as dos executables

Hi Daniel, I tried with your new version: file_5.08-1_amd64.deb (http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/file/file_5.08-1_amd64.deb) it has not work yet. Seems that this package contains the 5.08 and not 5.08-1 version. This is the output: --- root@office-kvm001:/usr/local/bin# ./file -v f

Bug#641012: base: /usr/bin/file command identifies incorrectly as a "DOS executable (COM)" starting with 0xE9.

Package: base Severity: important I found that the mailscanner package identifies and blocking incorrectly the TXT or HTML attachments starting with 0xE9 (Hungarian "é") character due to the file command says it is a DOS executable. Because of this bug, the mailscanner blocking some importnat ma

Bug#629272: sync errors during on-line play

, but some libraries like to reset it... - Bugs in Spring or any libs used for synced calculations that make the results of those synced calculations depend on unsynced data. I hope that was useful :-) Regards, Tobi On 5 June 2011 13:45, Tobi Vollebregt wrote: > Hi, > > I've actua

Bug#629272: sync errors during on-line play

ain compilation options, but the search space is huge :-/ I'll keep you informed if I figure out more on why it happens / how to solve it on Fedora, as the solution would probably apply to Debian too. Regards, Tobi On 5 June 2011 12:11, Jan Dittberner wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at

Bug#540150: git-svn: git svn clone fails silently

pears to keep running continuously without problems. There are apparently no writes that error out on a missing pipe... If I ctrl-C it and continue with stock git-svn it dies due to signal 13 within at most a few 100 revisions again. -- Tobi Vollebregt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-d

Bug#593098: require issue

Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > That is caused by the "magic" in ruby 1.9.* which tries to fallback to > using rubygems if a normal require fails. I'm not sure yet where we > should go about that. It might avoid trouble with unpackaged code, if this rubygems fallback is kept. But there should at least be

Bug#539568: An ITP looks like forgotten

Am 11.05.2010 10:41, schrieb Cleto Martin Angelina: The bug #539568 is an ITP for a C++ sockets library. The ITP was created on Augus'09. I'm interested in this package too, and I wrote an email to the bug author and I've received that his email does not exists. In this cases, what should be do

Bug#248809: system users

Vincent Bernat wrote: > Here is the list of package that name the user with the name of the > source package: - vdr:vdr Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#113146: Approved for gigantic gains

I gather it is the best way to gain popularity http://www.Fordevers.com/ The truth about orgasms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#260053: Embrace the future

Real men have real big peckers click here now http://www.Priceypie.com/ Orgasmic Wonderland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#99590: Report for investors

http://i13.tinypic.com/2w5t5ap.jpg Getting LIB and Extension DLL into Synch Robert H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#367883: license

ombination of CC & GPL, which doesn't contain or depend on any Total Annihilation content or intellectual property. Hence I'm convinced it should very well be possible to make an entirely free, redistributable package of it at this moment. -- Tobi Vollebregt (tvo), one of the active TA S