Hi Mehdi,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:38:18PM +0200, Mehdi wrote:
> There is a new upstream release of Slurm (14.03.6 as of today). Can you
> please update the package in Debian?
I'm in the process of renaming the slurm-llnl package, that's why it is
taking so much time to release the latest versi
Hi Stephane,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:57:02PM +0100, stephane.vaill...@obspm.fr wrote:
> Below is a patch that solves the problem for our configuration.
thanks for your help.
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:18:36PM +0100, Stephane Vaillant wrote:
> Below is a patch that I think solves the problem.
Thanks for your help.
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:09:31PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Thanks for considering,
Thank you for your help. The modification is already in my next package
release, but I need to solve some other issues to release it.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dis
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:43:14AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> For that the image packages need a "Depends: munge" just so create-munge-key
> is available if needed. But that means that suddenly the boot server also
> becomes a munged server. It would be better if I could depend on ju
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:42:04PM -0700, Chris Dunlap wrote:
> munge-0.5.11 was released 2013-08-27. It includes updated
> config.{guess,sub} files.
Yes I'm about to release it.
Chris can you please consider to add the patch attached?
Lintian pointed out that the systemd service file contains
Dear Simon,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:56:12PM +0100, Simon Ruderich wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the issue, but I'm not sure if the *FLAG
> -> AM_*FLAG change is the best way to handle this. Other
> Makefile.am handle it this way and it results in the correct
> flags, but maybe there is a be
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:53:27PM -0700, Dennis Jackson wrote:
> When using the --mail-type option in sbatch, slurm uses /bin/mail rather
> than /usr/bin/mail, as evidenced by the error in
> /var/log/slurm-llnl/slurmctld.log (and the fact that I get no email):
>
> [2010-07-12T13:49:45] erro
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:27:51PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> do these logrotate rules really need wildcards?
No, the files will be fixed in the next package release. Thanks for your
notification.
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi,
I do agree with Manuel objections.
Maybe you can call it ant-sinfo, from the name of the laboratory where
the tool is developed.
Best Regards
--
Gennaro
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 04:07:36PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> Hi Gaudenz!
>
> As it seems, the executable is named "sinfo", which is alre
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 04:17:20PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Hi. Any hope of having this fixed soon?
sorry I completely forgot this.
> Let me know if I should not NMU to get a fix into the archive.
No need to do a NMU. I'll fix it in the next few days.
> Happy hacking,
Thanks f
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.12
Tags: patch
Hyphens used as minus signs warning shouldn't be displayed when
strings are contained in pargraph written in draft_mode [1].
To reproduce the bug:
wget
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl_1.3.6-1lenny3_i386.deb
lintian -I
Hi Peter,
thanks for the patch. I already have the new package ready and was
waiting for upstream validation.
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:21:44PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> tags 526556 +patch sid squeeze
> thanks
>
> This bug does not affect lenny but it does affect both sid and
Thanks for your report, I forwarded it to upstream.
Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 07:59:45PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: slurm-llnl
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been checking packages to see if they properly check the return
> value of some o
Hi Manuel and Lucas,
thanks for the patch and for the bug report. The new package will be
soon available.
Regards,
--
Gennaro
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:52:08PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> tags + confirmed patch
> thanks
>
> Hi Gennaro and Lucas,
>
> it's just an outdated Build-Depends on the
Hi Ramsey,
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:02:53AM +0300, tep twep wrote:
>Hello Gennaro,
>
>I was doing an upgrade first, but then it failed and said do sudo apt-get
>install -f
>but that failed too so i did a apt-get remove slurm-llnl and did the
>install again, it failed there t
Hi Ramsey,
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 03:23:48PM +0300, Ramsey Haddad wrote:
> Package: slurm-llnl
> Version: 1.2.27-1
> Severity: important
>
>
> I can't install slurm-llnl, it keeps giving an error.
Are you installing or upgrading?
If you are installing, is the slurm user present on your syste
Hi Manuel,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 06:20:13PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> I encountered this bug again. I have not upgraded for a while so I did not
> notice it. The package fails to install on upgrade and install if the user
> "slurm" already exists,
Last time the bug was different:
"preinst fa
Hi Jerome,
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 09:51:49PM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Package: slurm-llnl
> Version: 1.2.25-1
> Severity: important
what was the version previously installed?
Did you have an installation compiled from the upstream source?
> I have just upgraded `slurm-llnl' on my boxes:
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: libpam-slurm
Version : 1.4
Upstream Authors: Chris Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jim Garlick <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> and Moe Jette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.llnl.gov/linux/slurm/
License : GPL
Description : P
Package: mpich
Version: 1.2.7-4
It would be desirable to add SLURM support to mpich. SLURM stands for
Simple Linux Utility for Resource Management, it is an open-source
cluster resource management and job scheduling system. SLURM recently
entered the Debian system as slurm-llnl package.
To add sup
Package: base-passwd
Version: 3.5.13
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of the package slurm-llnl. This package provides SLURM
which is a batch queuing system for clusters. In a cluster environment
the package needs to be installed on all the nodes of the cluster.
It usually works with one "central manager
Hi all,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 03:12:26PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> I think the default should be a working Infiniband install, and somebody
> who wants to silence a few messages can edit one or two lines in the
> config file (no I don't use Infiniband myself, but I think it makes sense to
> en
Dear Anton,
thanks for pointing this out. New package will fix this issue.
--
Gennaro
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 08:13:11AM -0500, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> Package: slurm-llnl
> Version: 1.2.11-1
>
> First up I'd like to thank you for packaging slurm!
>
> When installing I noticed a very small
Thanks Manuel,
the new version fix this issue.
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 06:57:28PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> Package: slurm-llnl
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi Gennaro,
>
> I noticed some override disparities on your QA site. The provided patch
> should fix these.
>
Package: sshfs
Version: 1.7-2
sshfs mount with remote uid and gid on the local filesystem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ id
uid=1000(oliva) gid=1000(oliva)
groups=20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),44(video),46(plugdev),107(fuse),1000(oliva)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh vega id
uid=500(oliva) gid=50
Thanks for pointing this out, 0.5.8-3 will solve this issue.
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Simon,
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:38:04PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> Strange.
Not strange as the solution of the problem: I removed a directory
called launcher under my home and now the panel works correctly.
> Do existing launchers work? i.e. the one for the settings manager, the
> one o
Hi Simon,
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:48:14AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> Did you upgrade whilst the panel was running? Have you tried restarting
> the panel?
I have upgraded when the panel was running. I have rebooted 2 times
since then but it still doesn't work.
> If that fixes it then there
Package: xfce4-panel
Version: 4.4.1-1
After the last upgrade xfce4-panel does not display launcher icons
anymore and If I try to add a new launcher I get the the following
message:
Could not open "launcher" module
My .xsession-errors shows:
** (xfce4-panel:3818): CRITICAL **: Could not open "Laun
30 matches
Mail list logo
