Bug#1100138: Re: Bug#1100138: Resignation & call for votes to elect the Chair

2025-03-12 Thread Craig Small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2025-03-11 at 17:12, matt...@debian.org wrote: > === BEGIN > > A: Christoph Berg > B: Helmut Grohne > C: Matthew Garrett > D: Stefano Rivera > E: Timo Röhling > F: Craig Small > G: Paul Tagliamonte > H: Matt

Bug#1099834: tech-ctte: Call for votes on TC membership of Paul Tagliamonte

2025-03-09 Thread Craig Small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2025-03-08 at 17:48, matt...@debian.org wrote: > ===BEGIN > The Technical Committee recommends that Paul Tagliamonte (paultag) be appointed by the Debian Project Leader to the Technical Committee. > > H: Recommend to Appoint Paul Tagliamonte (pau

Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

2025-03-03 Thread Craig Small
ggested by Helmut on [1] sounds reasonable. > Thanks Emilio, I'll wait until after release. Then get on with it. - Craig

Bug#1091995: Call for votes

2025-03-03 Thread Craig Small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 A > B > C > N Base-files is the right place for this directory but if there needs to be some sort of fix, then I prefer B over C. - Craig -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: FlowCrypt Email Encryption 8.5.7 Comment: Seamlessly send an

Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

2025-02-25 Thread Craig Small
I've now got a git branch on salsa showing the required changes and to see how it went getting built. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/procps/-/tree/new-pidof - Craig

Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

2025-02-25 Thread Craig Small
have pidof statically linked (to not pull in libproc-2). Then sysv-init-utils would remove pidof and not be marked Essential. There is some talk of in the long-run making packages needing pidof to depend on it, but that is a while off and I'm not sure its possible. - Craig -- Fo

Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

2025-02-25 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 21:07, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 09:26, Craig Small wrote: > - src:procps with a new procps-pidof binary package that > breaks/replaces current sysvinit-utils and with prio: essential > - drop pidof and prio:essential from sysvinit-u

Bug#1091864: tech-ctte: Avahi vs systemd-resolved vote concluded

2025-02-23 Thread Craig Small
I did vote. On the 17th February, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091864#151 FWIW S was first for me too. - Craig On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 09:33, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi, > > thanks all for voting. > > csmall: n/a > helmutg: S > A > F > matthe

Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

2025-02-20 Thread Craig Small
rocps. There didn't seem to be a good way of doing it. If you can find this twisty path, I'm happy to hear about it. - Craig On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 23:27, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2024 01:24:39 +0100 Luca Boccassi > wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 10:40:33 +00

Bug#880868: wordpress: CVE-2012-6707

2025-02-19 Thread Craig Small
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 06:09, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Looks this got fixed in > https://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/59828 > A 2012 CVE :) It's not in 6.7.2, let's hope it makes the next release. - Craig

Bug#1091864: tech-ctte: Avahi and systemd-resolved cannot a run mDNS responder at the same time

2025-02-17 Thread Craig Small
md-resolved e.g. using a resolved configuration file. > (Requires a 3:1 majority overruling a developer.) > > (F) Further discussion S > F > A If S doesn't get up then I think we need to find a different way than A. I share Timo's concern about that precedent. - Craig signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1085130: still not fixed in procps 2:4.0.4-7

2025-01-28 Thread Craig Small
grade /etc/sysctl.conf newconffile remove-on-upgrade /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.realmd.conf newconffile remove-on-upgrade /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.rpm.conf newconffile remove-on-upgrade /etc/dbus-1/system.d/wpa_supplicant.conf newconffile remove-on-upgrade - Craig

Bug#1092550: procps: Addback/Provide example of sysctl.d/*.conf like the old sysctl.conf under /usr/share/doc/

2025-01-14 Thread Craig Small
s at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/procps/-/commit/77f54cb9d9951b193d2aaeb694e56061309eb3ef - Craig On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 07:15, Kevin Liu wrote: > Package: procps > Version: 2:4.0.4-6 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: rkitsh...@hotmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > >

Bug#1084539: Scribus/Python

2025-01-09 Thread Craig Bradney
no issue here. thanks Craig signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Bug#1089468: wordpress: Supporting rootless builds by default

2025-01-07 Thread Craig Small
1-1 is the latest. If you got an idea for how to keep both happy then go for it. - Craig

Bug#1089468: wordpress: Supporting rootless builds by default

2025-01-02 Thread Craig Small
now. I didn't realise if its an expired key it doesn't even email you. - Craig > > > 20250101074850|process-upload|dak|wordpress_6.7.1+dfsg1-1_source.changes|Error > while loading changes file > > wordpress_6.7.1+dfsg1-1_source.changes: No valid signature found. (

Bug#1089468: wordpress: Supporting rootless builds by default

2024-12-31 Thread Craig Small
le locally. I'm not sure what happened after that, I got nothing from any of the Debian infrastructure. Anyway, I've tried uploading again. - Craig

Bug#1089488: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1089488: zfs-dkms: module build fails for kernel: 6.12.3-amd64 (x86_64)

2024-12-08 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 03:44:43PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Package: zfs-dkms > Version: 2.2.6-2 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > > [...] I suspect an upstream fix is required. Yes, this is quite common with zfs (and other out-of-tree kernel modules, e.g. the proprietary nvidia dr

Bug#1088934: w: "idle time" information is incorrect

2024-12-03 Thread Craig Small
Also one user session can have many /dev/pts/* devices and its not clear how to link a user to those devices reliably. "w" gives an incorrect idle time. Another issue is that "w" does not > output TTY information for me (that's bug 1080335). > That's a systemd issue that is impacting w. - Craig

Bug#1088934: w: "idle time" information is incorrect

2024-12-03 Thread Craig Small
ork and something has changed. The problem is now, how to determine the idle time of the user if the tty is not changing its access time? - Craig

Bug#1080333: procps: w(1) man page: obsolete contents about /var/run/utmp

2024-12-02 Thread Craig Small
d a note that its only for non-systemd systems. > According to strace, wtmpdb isn't used either. So, how is the > information obtained? > The same way loginctl does it, using the systemd library that reads /run/systemd/users/* - Craig

Bug#1088203: linux-sysctl-defaults: apply setting after installation

2024-11-25 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 at 10:27, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I've opened <https://salsa.debian.org/debian/procps/-/merge_requests/8> > to add the necessary file trigger to procps. > Thanks for that Ben, its now merged. - Craig

Bug#1085160: linux-sysctl-defaults: apply setting after installation

2024-11-04 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 05:56, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 21:09 +1100, Craig Small wrote: > > I'm not seeing that. There are three triggers in systemd 256.6-1 but not > > for sysctl files. > > Wouldn't it be in > > > https://salsa.debia

Bug#1086341: logcheck-database: systemd rules - Consumed CPU time change

2024-10-29 Thread Craig Small
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.4.3 Severity: normal The logcheck rule for system CPU time misses the new memory peak part. Current line in ignore.d.server/systemd: # possibly https://sources.debian.org/src/systemd/252.4-1/src/core/unit.c/#L2307 (line 2474 converts the "consumed"->"Consum

Bug#1077187: procps: please drop/replace the obsolete sysctl.conf(5) man page

2024-10-24 Thread Craig Small
README.sysctl) > should be removed. > That assumes there is systemd-sysctl installed, which might not be the case. There should be a note in sysctl.conf stating this is for procps sysctl, I'll add that. - Craig

Bug#1085160: linux-sysctl-defaults: apply setting after installation

2024-10-24 Thread Craig Small
tever-sysctl-is-here' script, where should it live? Or would some wiki entry do it better? - Craig

Bug#1076352: procps: leftover conffiles

2024-10-24 Thread Craig Small
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 09:33, of1 wrote: > Just a note to point out that /etc/sysctl.conf is still referenced in > the sysctl manual. Is the file still a valid and usable conf file? > Yes, for procps sysctl. - Craig

Bug#1077187: procps: please drop/replace the obsolete sysctl.conf(5) man page

2024-10-24 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 19:43, Craig Small wrote: > There should be a note in sysctl.conf stating this is for procps sysctl, > I'll add that. > https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/commit/ec590d5145668ea1868e1787c272d329ce5feba1

Bug#1085130: procps: /etc/sysctl.conf is still listed as a conffile

2024-10-14 Thread Craig Small
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 13:03, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > /etc/sysctl.conf is still listed as a conffile, and this can break > other tools. > It seems remove-on-upgrade in the conffiles didn't do what I wanted. I've added a rm_conffile to the mainscript which seems to have removed it. - Craig

Bug#1072533: procps: flaky autopkgtest:

2024-09-29 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, 26 Sept 2024 at 03:48, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 25-09-2024 12:05, Craig Small wrote: > > grep -E '^([[:space:]]+[[:digit:]]+){18}$' "${stdoutF}" >/dev/null > > I thought the problem was that the result didn't start with > ^[

Bug#1072533: procps: flaky autopkgtest:

2024-09-25 Thread Craig Small
to adjust the autopkgtest grep to look for only a few numbers, not 18. That's a bit annoying but when the identical test in DEJAGNU *always* passes, its the best that can be done. - Craig > > Paul > >

Bug#1072533: procps: flaky autopkgtest:

2024-09-23 Thread Craig Small
i sobibo in cs us sy id wa st gu 1 0 13416 7994060 1221344 151456200029 107 1372 22 8 1 91 0 0 0 buff column is the same as Buffers line (1221344) cache column is Cached + SReclaimable (14260336 + 885284 = 15145620) I tried it in a lxc container and vmstat works, but (correctly) shows 0 for Buffers and SReclaimable. - Craig

Bug#1081801: ps.1: Some remarks and editorial changes for this man page

2024-09-17 Thread Craig Small
Hi, I have added most of these changes to the upstream ps.1 Some of them have already been changed in other patches. - Craig On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 10:09, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: > Package: procps > Version: 2:4.0.4-5 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > >*

Bug#1077818: snmp-mibs-downloader: Consider adding RFC-1212, RFC-1215 and IANA-ENTITY-MIB

2024-08-18 Thread Craig Small
s. This one is easy - it is contained in RFC 6933 that also contains > ENTITY-MIB, so this adding IANA-ENTITY-MIB is a matter of editing > rfclist to: > > 6933ENTITY-MIB:IANA-ENTITY-MIB:UUID-TC-MIB > Done that, thanks! - Craig

Bug#1078938: bsdgames: Cannot Launch from GNOME menu (various issues with desktop files including Terminal= should be true)

2024-08-17 Thread Craig
Package: bsdgames Version: 2.17-34 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@whitehouse.gov Dear Maintainer, This package includes desktop files in /usr/share/applications/bsdgames All of them include `Terminal=True` which should be lowercase `Terminal=true`. Some of these desktop files should be rem

Bug#1078741: using ^R breaks ^C

2024-08-15 Thread Craig Sanders
Package: bash Version: 5.2.21-2.1+b1 I have no idea if this is a problem with bash or with readline but for the last week or so, sometimes (fairly often) when I use Ctrl-R to do a history search and recall, it prevents Ctrl-C from working - Ctrl-C is completely ignored, i.e. it doesn't do anything

Bug#1077764: Call for votes: don't issue any ruling

2024-08-08 Thread Craig Small
> = > BEGIN BALLOT > > The Technical Committee declines to overrule the maintainer of > base-files, or issue any advice on issues concerning /etc/os-release. > > We do not think there is a clear proposal on the table for us to assess, > and we do not think it is appropriate to issue any general

Bug#1076745: logcheck-database: cron rules

2024-07-22 Thread Craig Small
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.4.3 Severity: normal Hi, I'm getting logcheck entries like: Jul 23 06:02:01 myhost CRON[566969]: pam_unix(cron:session): session opened for user logcheck(uid=124) by logcheck(uid=0) The relevant mis-matching line is in paranoid.d/cron: ^(\w{3} [ :0-9]{1

Bug#729569: [watch] -g only reacts to visible output

2024-07-19 Thread Craig Small
h all we can do without some major refactoring. That may occur, but this method also causes watch to not display all the colours. - Craig

Bug#1076510: procps: "vm.max_map_count = 65530" : Value too small for gaming

2024-07-19 Thread Craig Small
e syctl default or kernel package that need to decide and update. - Craig

Bug#1072533: procps: flaky autopkgtest:

2024-07-19 Thread Craig Small
rocps-ng/procps/-/commit/42dce4d9f4132360647c4dcae1fbbfa1171528b3 2: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/492 Ideally, I'd like to push a pre-release into the Debian CI and see if it works now. I'm not sure there is a way of doing that. - Craig

Bug#1061944: wrong description for --unit in vmstat(1)

2024-07-19 Thread Craig Small
code got updated but the manpage was only half done. - Craig

Bug#1076352: procps: leftover conffiles

2024-07-17 Thread Craig Small
es Oh, I've not seen that method before but I see it is in deb-conffiles(5). I was going to use in a maintscript: rm_conffile /etc/sysctl.conf 2:4.0.4-6~ but your way looks better. - Craig

Bug#1072831: getting memory info fails when running under lxc

2024-06-23 Thread Craig Small
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 at 01:03, Paul Slootman wrote: > I am running a number of virtual systems under lxc via libvirt. > This means these systems share the host kernel (not like qemu where a > whole virtual machine is emulated). Hi Paul, I did the following (as root) lxc-create --name debtest2 --t

Bug#1074156: procps: Depend or Recommend linux-sysctl-defaults

2024-06-23 Thread Craig Small
3.16-4~ procps mv_conffile /usr/lib/sysctl.d/protect-links.conf /usr/lib/sysctl.d/99-protect-links.conf 2:3.3.17-6~ procps Also procps ships an old /etc/sysctl.d/README.sysctl should that also be deleted or moved into this new package? - Craig

Bug#1072831: getting memory info fails when running under lxc

2024-06-23 Thread Craig Small
commit/104b3ce3df67092eeb868ba5e019cb895ebdf32d We're hoping to get a new procps release soon. - Craig

Bug#1072831: getting memory info fails when running under lxc

2024-06-10 Thread Craig Small
ing free should fix ps too. procps after 3.3.17 has a *lot* of changes, but I didn't think parsing the meminfo file was one of those. - Craig

Bug#1036630: procps: unowned /usr/bin/ps on filesystem after upgrade to bookworm

2024-06-10 Thread Craig Small
n -> usr/bin $ realpath /bin/ps /usr/bin/ps Or in other words, /bin is symlink to /usr/bin and /bin/ps is not a real file. So the trick here is to work out what you have here first. I'm also curious why you're at version 4.0.3-1 Bookworm is 4.0.2-3 and Trixie/Sid at 4.0.4-4; upgrading to the latest might clear this issue. 4.0.4-4 has a /usr/bin/ps because of the usrmerge/DEP-17 transistion. - Craig

Bug#1072533: procps: flaky autopkgtest:

2024-06-04 Thread Craig Small
system. It also works on salsa. > 53s [1;31mASSERT: [0mvalue line I see the prepare_testbed just before this failed too, not sure what that is. The value line is running 'vmstat' and then for the third line grep -E '^([[:space:]]+[[:digit:]]+){18}$' "${stdoutF}" i.e. is there 18 fields. - Craig

Bug#1068632: dh-exec still broken

2024-05-20 Thread Craig Small
e and renamed in the install phase. Could you have a look at it and see what differences there could be? I'm not seeing any errors with that example. - Craig

Bug#1071430: dkms modules compile twice when installing new linux-image and linux-headers packages

2024-05-18 Thread Craig Sanders
Sign command: /lib/modules/6.8.9-amd64/build/scripts/sign-file Signing key: /var/lib/dkms/mok.key Public certificate (MOK): /var/lib/dkms/mok.pub [...] depmod dkms autoinstall on 6.8.9-amd64/x86_64 succeeded for nvidia-current zfs dkms: autoinstall for kernel: 6.8.9-amd64. Setting up linux-headers-amd64 (6.8.9-1) ... real 3m4.300s user 16m20.516s sys 1m21.171s craig

Bug#1068017: Y2038-safe replacements for utmp/wtmp and lastlog

2024-05-07 Thread Craig Small
gets updated to something better; it's a low-priority for me because systemd/elogind do what I need most of the time. - Craig

Bug#1065810: tech-ctte: Call for votes on TC membership of Craig Small

2024-04-25 Thread Craig Small
do, here's one thing. No idea what the administrative stuff Sean is talking about, I guess I'll find out soon. - Craig On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 at 13:47, Sean Whitton wrote: > Ping again. Thanks. > > On Thu 28 Mar 2024 at 01:33pm +08, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > Hello, &

Bug#1069828: [debian trixie] [package procps] w segmentation fault

2024-04-25 Thread Craig Small
doesn't get filled in with the short options and there is a null pointer. The next procps release will have the fix at https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/commit/79042e07fab9956135a21b1df7a69d1fbde7ef79 I'll leave this Debian bug open until 4.0.5 makes it into Debian. - Craig

Bug#1069091: wordpress: Stored XSS in Avatar block

2024-04-16 Thread Craig Small
Package: wordpress Version: 6.5+dfsg1-1 Severity: important Tags: security X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team In WordPress < 6.5.2 there is a stored XSS in the Avatar block. You have to have certain things enabled for it to work so it won't impact everyone. References: https://wpscan.com/blog/

Bug#1068632: dh-exec-install - dh_missing fails when using arch or indep

2024-04-08 Thread Craig Small
Package: dh-exec Version: 0.29 Severity: normal In a multi-binary package, if there is a dh-exec-install .install or .manpages file for one of the packages, then these files are not carried across and logged for dh_install so dh_missing fails if you use the other type of build. For example, on t

Bug#1059997: razercfg: pyrazer modules installed in incorrect location

2024-03-24 Thread Craig Small
Package: razercfg Version: 0.42+ds-4 Followup-For: Bug #1059997 Hi, You have double "dist-packages" in the install path. $ python3 Python 3.11.8 (main, Feb 7 2024, 21:52:08) [GCC 13.2.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> from pyrazer import * Tr

Bug#1066090: psmisc: killall --older-than doesn't work as documented in a container

2024-03-13 Thread Craig Small
ses clock_gettime() instead so the start times are correct. killall would be impacted by the same issue. - Craig 1: https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/commit/b5e19c1730bcc68d553f44b5585704e3c92267bf#83c45d853acc8384452b404946e4a0c484b16a4e_1519_1515

Bug#1064968: marked as done (net-snmp: CVE-2024-26464)

2024-02-28 Thread Craig Small
if it is one of those automatic detector things? Thanks for following up on this. - Craig

Bug#1064219: net-snmp: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-18 Thread Craig Small
Hi Steve, Looks like you missed one: dh_installdocs -plibsnmp-perl -ptkmib -plibsnmp-base -plibsnmp40 dh_installdocs: error: Requested unknown package libsnmp40 via -p/--package, expected one of: snmpd snmptrapd snmp libsnmp-base libsnmp40t64 libnetsnmptrapd40t64 libsnmp-dev libsnmp-perl tkmib d

Bug#1063444: psmisc: FTBFS due to unexpected failures running tests

2024-02-12 Thread Craig Small
https://gitlab.com/psmisc/psmisc/-/commit/8fa115138f79f807d2f07e578f9a40c38c228c0b If you can confirm it is the same issue then I've got the fix. - Craig

Bug#827171: [uptime] show container uptime

2024-02-07 Thread Craig Small
used locally here is to look at /dev/pts: > ps -o etimes 1 will do it too The upstream libproc2 now has a feature of providing container uptime and both w and uptime have the option either as a command line or environment variable. - Craig

Bug#1060706: linux-image-6.1.0-17-amd64: intel i225 NIC loses PCIe link, network becomes unusable

2024-02-02 Thread Craig Holyoak
FWIW I'm having the same problems. Granted, this NIC is in a Thunderbolt dock, so one can't exclude this as a factor, but the errors are identical. This is even the case running the 6.7.1-1~exp1 kernel from experimental.

Bug#1059649: NTP does not keep accurate time on bookworm

2024-02-01 Thread Craig Small
ptrapd.s* debian/snmptrapd.service:ExecStart=/usr/sbin/snmptrapd -LOw -f udp:162 udp6:162 debian/snmptrapd.socket:ListenDatagram=0.0.0.0:162 debian/snmptrapd.socket:ListenDatagram=[::]:162 debian/snmptrapd.socket:# ListenStream=0.0.0.0:162 debian/snmptrapd.socket:# ListenStream=[::]:162 It would be more friendly when snmpd and snmptrapd degrade gracefully to > IPv4-only when there is no IPv6 on the system. > I don't think its that. - Craig

Bug#1059649: NTP does not keep accurate time on bookworm

2024-02-01 Thread Craig Small
d the same issue. > What, specifically, are you doing to see this message? Running what you see in the service file on the command line won't work and will give this result. - Craig

Bug#1062250: Please add ucd-snmp/lmSensors MIB module to monitor lm_sensors data

2024-01-31 Thread Craig Small
sensorsMib and run your walk again you should get a lot of messages like: Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:40280->[127.0.0.1]:161 ucd-snmp/lmsensorsMib: lmSensorsTables_handler - root: LM-SENSORS-MIB::lmTempSensorsTable, mode 160 - Craig

Bug#1059817: #1059817 fixed in experimental

2024-01-28 Thread Craig Small
Hi Chris, It got uploaded to unstable tonight. - Craig On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 07:30, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Hi, > > please upload the fix for #1059817 also to unstable. > > Thanks, > Chris >

Bug#1060359: psmisc: install fuser into /usr (DEP17)

2024-01-12 Thread Craig Small
new version of psmisc with that patch. - Craig

Bug#1059828: colourised crontab -l output is unreadable

2024-01-01 Thread Craig Sanders
Package: cron Version: 3.0pl1-182 Please don't force colourised tty output by default. It makes the output unreadable. Forcing one person's colour preferences on everyone is a vision impairment / accessibility problem for everyone who doesn't have the same visual capability as that one individual

Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

2023-11-19 Thread Craig Small
all be done directly with s-s-d. > I agree that this is a good idea. It will be more about removing the Essential flag on any package. - Craig

Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

2023-11-13 Thread Craig Small
Hello, For quite some time (since 2006!) there has been a discussion at[1] about changing from the sysvinit-utils version of pidof to the procps one. A quick scan of the various distributions shows that only Debian and Ubuntu (and I assume most other downstreams) use the sysvinit-utils version.

Bug#810018: Bug #810018: Consider shipping pidof with procps

2023-11-13 Thread Craig Small
something up on this as it changes a lot. There are probably two questions 1) Does pidof need to be in an Essential package? While a lot of packages do have pidof in them a lot (but not all) of those are in init scripts. 2) Does pidof need its own package then - Craig

Bug#810018: Bug #810018: Consider shipping pidof with procps

2023-11-13 Thread Craig Small
3.0.8-4) sysvinit-utils maintainers create 3.08-4 without pidof and have Breaks: procps (<< 2:4.0.4-3) If everyone is in agreement with this, I'll update procps this week. - Craig

Bug#1055126: procps: pgrep and pidwait are identical. one should by a symlink to the other

2023-10-31 Thread Craig Small
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 08:15, Ani Hay wrote: > Instead of wasting all this space one should be a symlink to the other. > 39 kilobytes is not exactly a lot.

Bug#1053706: procps: [w] no "from" data and segfault with parameter -s

2023-10-10 Thread Craig Small
tion error" > That's upstream issue 301 (https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/issues/301) which is fixed upstream. - Craig

Bug#831786: dh-exec: breaks dh_install --fail-missing

2023-09-22 Thread Craig Small
multiarch directories but that is solved elsewhere. It's a 5-year-old bug, I'm not really sure what dh_missing needs to be happy that the file has been handled. - Craig

Bug#1052034: procps: FTBFS on amd64, i386: # of unexpected failures 1

2023-09-17 Thread Craig Small
27;s only in the upstream package at the moment. - Craig On Sat, 16 Sept 2023 at 20:57, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Source: procps > Version: 2:4.0.4-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the > past) >

Bug#1049457: fuser(1) not working on libraries, possibly because of disagreement over minor device

2023-09-01 Thread Craig Small
t way. - Craig On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 12:07, Paul Kimoto wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:03:14PM -0400, Paul Kimoto wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 05:25:26PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > >> What does > >> grep -e ' 0:2[57] ' /proc/self/mountinfo

Bug#1030747: Acknowledgement (fuser(1) tries to use statx() which is not available on older kernels and prints misleading error when it can't)

2023-09-01 Thread Craig Small
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 10:51, Andras Korn wrote: > The changelog for 23.6 says "fuser: Use modern statn where possible", but > it's regrettably also used where not possible. > The next release of psmisc will have that fallback, see https://gitlab.com/psmisc/psmisc/-/commit/c22d1e4edbfec6e24346cd8

Bug#1049457: fuser(1) not working on libraries, possibly because of disagreement over minor device

2023-08-16 Thread Craig Small
grep -e ' 0:2[57] ' /proc/self/mountinfo show? You could also try sudo nsenter -a -t fuser /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 - Craig

Bug#1042887: procps: CVE-2023-4016 ps buffer overflow External

2023-08-10 Thread Craig Small
overflows and malloc will allocate less memory. You basically need to have a recompiled kernel that increases ARG_MAX for it to happen. Using the number of items, calculated later, and more importantly using calloc() fixes the issue. - Craig

Bug#1042887: procps: CVE-2023-4016 ps buffer overflow

2023-08-02 Thread Craig Small
Package: procps Version: 2:4.0.3-1 Severity: important Tags: security X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team We have a very scant report of a ps buffer overflow security bug. Under some circumstances, this weakness allows a user who has access to run the “ps” utility on a machine, the ability to wr

Bug#1040936: openscap-utils: oscap-docker fails due to missing dependency on python3-openscap

2023-07-12 Thread Craig Andrews
Package: openscap-utils Version: 1.3.8+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, oscap-docker doesn't working due to a missing dependency on python3-openscap as seen below: $ oscap-docker Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/oscap-docker", line 24, in from oscap_docker_python

Bug#1037450: procps: [pgrep] [regression]: >15 characters warning when long regex doesn't match

2023-06-12 Thread Craig Small
for some sort odd corner cases, just the main ones. I'm not even going to bother with checking if the regex is too long (e.g. somethingverylonghere|somethingelsethatisverylong) because this is a simple check. Probably just scan the string looking for those chars and its done. - Craig O

Bug#1034203: snmp: specifying -Op /at all/ segfaults all snmpcmd(1) commands

2023-04-11 Thread Craig Small
not Debian-specific unless it's my build options. - Craig

Bug#1032139: snmp: snmpbulkwalk.1 mentions snmpbulkget instead of snmpbulkwalk

2023-02-28 Thread Craig Small
arded to https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/537 I'll put this Debian patch in too. - Craig

Bug#1029069: libc6: wcswidth doesn't report correct width for :

2023-01-17 Thread Craig Small
e, the "b" in blah lines up with the "n" in len but wcswidth thinks it is 2. I have no idea why this is so and even where this information comes from. It's not the end-of-the world sort of bug, but it is a very stange one. - Craig 1: https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/i

Bug#1027963: vmstat: does not update memory columns

2023-01-05 Thread Craig Small
eport and the patch. It has been applied upstream and as a debian patch for the package. I can't believe that we had been testing it for years and not seen it before. - Craig

Bug#1025915: skill: -p $pid seems broken

2023-01-05 Thread Craig Small
sing first. If you're writing new scripts, then pkill is better maintained than skill but in any case, a bug is a bug. - Craig

Bug#1027771: its nocompatible

2023-01-02 Thread Craig Small
For some reason the issue is not vim-ale its something broken in the generic vim infrastructure. debian.vim sets nocompatible which is supposed to stop the issue but it doesn't running vim -N or putting "set nocompatible" in ~/.vimrc fixes it

Bug#1027771: vim-ale gives error messages when starting

2023-01-02 Thread Craig
Package: vim-ale Version: 3.2.0-1 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 vim-ale is being very unhappy, this is a brand-new installation of the package, I previous used vim-syntastic but its going away. I think it is assuming a particular vim version or some additional

Bug#1024020: net-snmp: CVE-2022-44792 CVE-2022-44793

2023-01-02 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 at 18:33, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Upstream has addressed both issues with > https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/commit/be804106fd0771a7d05236cff36e199af077af57 I've made a debian patch and uploaded 5.9.3+dfsg-2 that has this fix. - Craig

Bug#1027270: guymager doesn't require libprocps

2023-01-02 Thread Craig Small
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 22:21, Michael Prokop wrote: > I just uploaded guymager v0.8.13-2 which takes care of this. Great, that's another one down. Thanks for the quick response. - Craig

Bug#1027271: open-vm-tools doesn't need libprocps

2022-12-30 Thread Craig Small
Hi I checked the source code, build logs and current binaries, open-vm-tools doesn't use libprocps or link to it. A simple removal of libprocps-dev from debian/control will fix this. - Craig

Bug#1027270: guymager doesn't require libprocps

2022-12-30 Thread Craig Small
Hi, I checked the build logs, the source code and even the current binary packages. guymager does not need libprocps. A simple removal of libprocps-dev from debian/control is all that is needed. - Craig

Bug#1022573: transition: procps

2022-12-30 Thread Craig Small
ackages do not depend on libprocps. Looks like old dependencies so the removal of libprocps-dev from their build dependency line in control is all that is needed. I can do that, or the respective maintainers can. - Craig

Bug#1022573: transition: procps

2022-12-30 Thread Craig Small
OK, open-vm-tools doesn't even use the library so that's an easy fix. On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 15:50, Craig Small wrote: > On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 at 05:04, Paul Gevers wrote: > >> With procps migrated to testing, dose [1] is reporting two more packages >> that weren&#

Bug#1022573: transition: procps

2022-12-30 Thread Craig Small
en-vm-tools has a new version in unstable that's now unable to > migrate. > Odd they hadn't noticed it not compiling. I think I have looked at both these before so I'll see what I can do. - Craig

Bug#1022573: transition: procps

2022-12-22 Thread Craig Small
t instead of return for some functions when there was a failure, but most of them used both anyway so it seemed pretty arbitrary. If /proc is unmounted or malloc fails, you're in a world of hurt anyway. Timo, if you need help getting the next version linked to libproc2 I've done both versions so I can help. - Craig

Bug#1022573: procps transition status at Dec 22

2022-12-21 Thread Craig Small
#1024218 - apitrace - patch available #1024219 - cpu-x - patch available at upstream git #1024220 - deepin-screen-recorder - nil #1024221 - intel-gpu-tools - patch available upstream, version issues #1024223 - obs-advanced-scene-switcher - Done! #1024224 - openscap - Done! #1024225 - veyon - nil I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >