It seems to be a issue with the currency exchange rate update with HTTP:
~$ gnome-calculator
** (gnome-calculator:15095): WARNING **: 17:02:15.089:
currency-provider.vala:161: Couldn't download IMF currency rate file:
HTTP/2 Error: INTERNAL_ERROR
(gnome-calculator:15095): libsoup-WARNING **
Package: incron
Version: incron
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I run a server with NFS-exports. And i want to run some actions when
files and dirs are changing in these exports. For better explanation,
its the filespace for a nextcloud i want to export also as nfs, because
it's much faster on
FYI, I submitted a patch to Debian on 19 March, over two months ago.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067126
It has taken Debian developers (volunteers) over 10 weeks (!!!)
to pick up a simple patch that I packaged for them and signed on
salsa.debian.org. :(
Gianfranco, thank you for sponsoring this upload.
> Please some nitpicks for a future upload
> 1) wait for the sponsor upload before tagging,
>many of your entries were never uploaded
ack.
Still, this seems like unnecessary latency between humans once a Debian
developer volunteer picks up th
lighttpd-1.4.76-3 passes autopkgtests and expected CI tests,
and is tagged. (This is a non-DD maintainer upload.)
* Package name : lighttpd
Version : 1.4.76-3
Upstream contact : team+light...@tracker.debian.org
* URL : https://lighttpd.net/
* License :
lighttpd-1.4.76-2 passes autopkgtests and expected CI tests,
and is tagged. (This is a non-DD maintainer upload.)
* Package name : lighttpd
Version : 1.4.76-2
Upstream contact : team+light...@tracker.debian.org
* URL : https://lighttpd.net/
* License :
lighttpd-1.4.76-1 passes autopkgtests and expected CI tests,
and is tagged. (This is a non-DD maintainer upload.)
* Package name : lighttpd
Version : 1.4.76-1
Upstream contact : team+light...@tracker.debian.org
* URL : https://lighttpd.net/
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: gs-bugs.debian@gluelogic.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a DD sponsor for my package "lighttpd":
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lighttpd/
I am an upstream lighttpd developer and have participated in
maintaining lighttpd on Deb
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: gs-bugs.debian@gluelogic.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a DD sponsor for my package "lighttpd":
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lighttpd/
I am an upstream lighttpd developer and have participated in
maintaining lighttpd on Deb
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> With the attached patch lighttpd cleanly cross-builds from source.
Thanks, Emanuele.
A slightly different patch:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lighttpd/-/commit/a7d695d59c9a8bffe154aae29e335102beaaf3f2
was committed a few weeks
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: gs-bugs.debian@gluelogic.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a DD sponsor for my package "lighttpd":
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lighttpd/
I am an upstream lighttpd developer and have participated in
maintaining lighttpd on Deb
Repeating: lighttpd TLS configuration recommendations supercede
the issue reported here. (https://wiki.lighttpd.net/Docs_SSL)
> I now removed that cipher list (falling back to the default), and this
> disabled the 2 remaining ciphers (DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 and
> DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) t
Marco, please review my previous messages and try to help provide
additional information.
Thank you. Glenn
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 09:28:24AM +, Alain Knaff wrote:
> Package: lighttpd
> Version: 1.4.69-1
>
> Since our upgrade to Debian 12, lighttpd now uses insecure
> Diffie-Hellman parameters
> c90fdaa22168c234c4c6628b80dc1cd129024e088a67cc74020bbea63
> b139b22514a08798e3404ddef9
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: gs-bugs.debian@gluelogic.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a DD sponsor for my package "lighttpd":
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lighttpd/
I am an upstream lighttpd developer and have participated in
maintaining lighttpd on Deb
Macro, please review my previous messages and try to help provide
additional information.
Thank you. Glenn
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:49:21AM +0200, Michael Moore wrote:
...
> Issue and suggested fix:
> ===
> In lighttpd.conf the includes for conf-enabled/*.conf happens after passing
> server.port to the use-ipv6.pl script. Re-ordering these lines so that the
> conf files are included fi
Ubuntu fixed this bug with
jq (1.6-2.1ubuntu1) hirsute; urgency=medium
[ Alex Murray ]
* Fix fromdate when local time is during daylight savings (LP: #1910162)
- d/p/fix-ftbfs-when-localtime-is-dst.patch: Backport upstream patch
which ensures fromdate uses the correct time during dayl
Can this be closed? Are there any action items remaining for this bug?
I am still getting messages that packages depending on wolfssl are
"marked for autoremoval from testing on 2023-01-27"
Thank you. Glenn
> I plan to upload version 5.5.1 in the near future.
Felix, a month has passed and we are still waiting for an upload.
Failure to upload a version with security fixes within the next few days
will result in wolfssl and packages which depend on wolfssl to be
removed from Debian Testing.
Please ac
Package: pgbackrest
Version: 2.25-2
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
>From 2.14-1 to 2.25-2, the main binary moved from /usr/bin to /bin. I
know that we should have merged /usr but it should either be mentioned
in the changelog, or revert the change.
For now
Package: miniupnpd
Version: 2.1-6.1
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
According to https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp/issues/334 some
initialization logic was lost in iptables-init.sh.
It was reinstated in
https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp/commit/c3f752d
Thank you very much! Adding CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE solved it for me as well. Not sure
how many hours it would have taken for me to figure it out.
Does systemd or the linux kernel log capability violations somewhere? (is it
even possible)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hi,
Is there any reason to use opencv4.pc as filename? Previously, it was
opencv.pc, so now, we need to modify all references to it.
Since pkg-config already provides a way to check version, I think it's
better to keep the old unversioned name.
Have a nice day,
Adrien
Hey there, got this warning, dunno why, never read this before.
Here's what I did before I got this warning.
Be aware that I use parrot 4.6, which is based on debian but is a
rolling distribution.
The not upgraded (helt back) packages are some nvidia packages, not
needed on my system (no nvidia c
> This is called proof by counter-example.
> If you cannot do this, and if nobody else can do this, then you cannot
> claim that it is not safe to use this script.
This is not a valid argument. Nobody can yet prove (by example) that it
is not safe to go near a black hole. But it is not safe.
The n
Package: marble
Version: 4:17.08.3-3
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Upstream bug: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394517
So nobody has proposed something yet. Since contributing to Marble is a
bit complicated (I don't have any account for now), here is a small patch.
Adrie
After another apt update; apt upgrade, everything is working fine…
I don't know if it was linked, but there was an update for:
python3-pkg-resources (38.5.2-1 => 39.0.1-1)
python3-setuptools (38.5.2-1 => 39.0.1-1)
Anyway, this can be closed for me. Sorry for the disturbance.
Adrien
Hi,
I don't really know if this should be an RC bug, but this package has
entered testing. And as such, migration is not possible without fetching
source package.
Adrien
Sorry for being late on all of this, but I have a few remarks on this.
First, thanks for the service file, and the long explanation.
Regarding socket activation, I currently have this (custom) socket unit:
[Unit]
Description=Iodine socket
[Socket]
# For now, listen only in IPv4
ListenDatagram=0.0
Le 14/07/2016 à 13:51, Scott Leggett a écrit :
>
> If a package really does recommend other packages which are useless, you
> should file a bug on that package, not just start blindly using
> --no-install-recommends everywhere.
It is a never ending debate. If installing recommended packages is the
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 23:37:01 -0300 Felipe Sateler
wrote:
>
> Do you have disabled installation of Recommends?
>
Hi,
I guess he did, just like me, because installing recommends often leads
to a workload of useless packages.
Even if I totally understand that the packager is not expected to
support
Additionnal informations:
python
Python 2.7.11+ (default, May 9 2016, 15:54:33)
[GCC 5.3.1 20160429] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import requests; requests.__version__.split('.')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
F
Package: grub-pc
Severity: normal
I can also reproduce this problem with grub 1.98~20100115-1. Removing grub.cfg
lets grub
go into it's recovery prompt.
Reinstalling grub does not fix anything.
Downgrading to 1.98~20100107-1 makes everyting work again.
-- Package-specific info:
*
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Minimal Netinst from CD-R
Image version:
http://laotzu.acc.umu.se/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
Date: 2009.03.22
Machine: Dell Precision 670
Processor: 2x Xeon 3.6 w/hyperthreading enabled
Memory:
Hello, right after this morning last upgrade, my proftp server and my
webmin stopped to work throwing out these errors :
/var/log/webmin/miniserv.error:/usr/bin/perl: relocation error:
/lib/libresolv.so.2: symbol __res_iclose, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not
defined in file libc.so.6 with link time ref
i don't have debian but if those who do help then i'm sure
we can figure this out. it's a high priority for me that
the linux client runs great.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
37 matches
Mail list logo
