On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> Git is not linked to Debian bugtracker to reference and close bugs
>> automatically, isn't it?
>
> There's no general rule but this repository has no suc
Package: tracker.debian.org
Login page https://tracker.debian.org/accounts/login/ refers
to non-existing https://sso.debian.org/spkac/enroll/ page for
SSO login.
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.6.3
Trying to submit report under root fails after editing message with vim.
Report will be sent to "Debian Bug Tracking System"
Submit this report on tracker.debian.org (e to edit)
[Y|n|a|c|e|i|l|m|p|q|d|t|s|?]?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/r
Attached patch sets --user option only if no --system, --prefix or
--target are defined, which are mutually exclusive to this option.
diff --git a/pip/commands/install.py b/pip/commands/install.py
index 13b328f..dcc4cd4 100644
--- a/pip/commands/install.py
+++ b/pip/commands/install.py
@@ -55,12 +
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Given that UDD does more, it could also implement a stripped down
> version. But I'm not sure what is the functionality you are looking for.
> Monitor a specific package using RSS? Stats?
>
As for me, the most useful Debian External Hea
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:45 PM, anarcat wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:01:46PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> > Package: qa.debian.org
> >
> > DEHS service at http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/ looks alive, but in
> > fact it is dead and its database is o
Package: coreutils
This is a continuation of archived
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488024
The above bug closed as wontfix in Debian, but seems fixed in Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/379233
Why it is important to make "cp --no-preserve=mode"
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 768359 + upstream patch fixed-upstream
> quit
>
> Hi,
>
> anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
>> git clone unconditionally creates main dir with 755
>> mode ignoring ACL and POSIX permissions if they
>&
Package: git
Version: 1:1.7.10.4-1+wheezy1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
git clone unconditionally creates main dir with 755
mode ignoring ACL and POSIX permissions if they
are different.
More info here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10637416/git-clone-respects-umask-except-for-top-
Well, even with mailto: integration it takes me absolute minimal of 8
actions (all mouse clicks) to go through a full cycle if subscription
to a single bug, so I confirm that the issue exists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Package: bugs.debian.org
Access to Debian bug reports in Internet Archive is blocked by robots.txt
http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736214
Current contents of https://bugs.debian.org/robots.txt:
[cut here]
User-Agent: Googlebot, bingbot, yand
If you use web-based client, the process is not that painful after
setting mailto: handler correctly.
As for actual SSO integration I believe it depends on #277744.
http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2012/02/open-mailto-links-using-gmail-in-google.html
--
anatoly t.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: qa.debian.org
DEHS service at http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/ looks alive, but in
fact it is dead and its database is offline for almost two years,
which is shown by multiple reports in ML over that time
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/dehs-devel/
It's time to kill it so that it
Package: general
http://anonscm.debian.org/ doesn't have any coordinates in site footer
to report issues such as this one
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-pyftpdlib/trunk/debian/watch?r1=13515&r2=13521
and others.
--
anatoly t.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
bric already in Debian
> Hi,
>
> I'm closing this bug because this package is already in Debian:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/fabric
>
> Regards.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: anatoly techtonik
> To: Debian BTS Submit
> Cc:
> Date: Mon, 2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name : fabric
Version : 1.6.1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/fabric/fabric/blob/1.6/AUTHORS
URL : http://docs.fabfile.org/
License : BSD (https://github.com/fabric/fabric/blob/1.6/LICENSE)
Description : Python library and command-line tool for streaml
If the package is broken and doesn't work at all, what is the reason to
upload it to unstable with low priority?
The same problem trying Debian Squeeze in virt-manager with qxl on Fedora 17:
unaligned pointer 0x8ef20002
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
>
> Are you still able to reproduce this error?
>
>
No. I am using Trac 0.12 in custom virtualenv installation that's
independent of Debian libraries. Even though Martin does a great job in
maintaining Trac packages, changing something in
affects 649349 xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64
affects 646945 svn-buildpackage
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I'd say the priority should be raised to critical. See bug #646945 for
another symptom.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting anatoly techtonik (techto...@gmail.com):
>> Why is it so hard to fix this, i.e. to teach aptitude update apt-get
>> structures for packages that aptitude puts on hold?
>>
>> This inconsistency is alread
Why is it so hard to fix this, i.e. to teach aptitude update apt-get
structures for packages that aptitude puts on hold?
This inconsistency is already causing troubles with SCM tools.
http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/bcfg2/ticket/1066
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.
Thanks for the explanation. I'll work more closely with the person,
who created this machine and let you know if the problem persists in a
new setup.
--
anatoly t.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
reopen
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
>
>> I understand that, but I am nor Perl expert, neither have time to
>> become one, so unless somebody tells me what to do, chances that I can
>> do anything on my own are minimal. If that `svn-buildpackage` was
>> writte
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:46:48 +0300
> anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
>> > tag 646945 + unreproducible
>> > quit
>
> i.e. you're going to have
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> tag 646945 + unreproducible
> quit
>
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:53:48 +0300
> anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
> I (and the rest of the team @ work) use svn-bp on squeeze on a daily
> basis, I don't see these problems.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> tag 646945 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for trying to improve Debian!
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 05:53:48PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> Package: svn-buildpackage
>> Version: 0.
Package: svn-buildpackage
Version: 0.8.3
Severity: important
svn-buildpackage doesn't execute at all failing with the message
Illegal instruction
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-xe
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
I propose a clarification to build-arch and build-indep fields:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules
- The build target should depend on those of the targets build-arch
and build-indep that are provided in the rules file.
+
Could you, please, provide links to replacements from the headers of
corresponding sections? The documentation is still available from the
web, and its (Obsolete Documentation) confuses people without
providing any hints where to look for updated information.
For example, the HOW-TO its the top li
Package: trac-bitten
Version: 0.6b2
Severity: normal
I'd like to install some Bitten slaves without installing Trac dependecy.
Bitten allows that. Debian is not.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers oldstable
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell
Attaching the patch here as it won't be integrated upstream, because
0.11 branch accepts only critical bugfixes. 0.12 uses different
approach that modifies behavior of plugin loader and backporting this
can break things.
--
anatoly t.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:54 PM, anatoly techtonik
s 562963 +patch
> thanks
>
> Quoting "anatoly techtonik" :
>>
>> Here is a patch prototype for 0.11-dev branch. It won't work from the
>> start probably, because I don't have time to test it right now and
>> there is no guarantee I'll re
Here is a patch prototype for 0.11-dev branch. It won't work from the
start probably, because I don't have time to test it right now and
there is no guarantee I'll return to it next week. But it's better
than nothing.
--
anatoly t.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:41 PM, anat
way how to link these.
I'll keep you updated.
--
anatoly t.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 4:38 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting "anatoly techtonik" :
>>
>> Yep. I know that. It is because plugin system in original WebAdmin
>> plugin was designed with eggs in mi
Package: debhelper
Version: 5.0.42
Severity: minor
It would be nice if dh_install man page included some hints about
what is "the current directory" in the following paragraph:
"The name of the files (or directories) to install should be given
relative to the current directory, while the inst
Package: wipe2fs
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
$ sudo apt-get -b source wipe2fs
Reading package lists... Done
../configure --build i486-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
checking ext2fs/ext2fs.h usability... no
checking ext2fs/ext2fs.h presence... n
38 matches
Mail list logo
