Bug#732643: I just discovered this is a duplicate of bug 675512

2013-12-19 Thread Zach Carter
Feel free to mark this as a duplicate of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675512 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#732643: Please add snapshot session sharing feature

2013-12-19 Thread Zach Carter
Package: schroot Version: 1.6.5 Severity: wishlist I have a user who would like to create an lvm snapshot session and then share it with another user. Currently only the root user can access other user's sessions. It would be helpful if a non-root user could run a command to grant a second non-r

Bug#711277: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#711277: contents of 1.7.0 tarball has changed

2013-06-11 Thread Zach Carter
> Thanks for the diff. I'm not sure where the different tarballs > have originated from--maybe one was a prerelease test tarball? Thanks Roger. Do you have any ideas on the proper way to resolve the unit test failures I'm seeing with the official tarball? -Zach -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#656239: compile errors with gcc 4.7

2012-01-17 Thread Zach Carter
Package: schroot Version: 1.4.23 The gcc compiler in the Fedora distribution has recently been updated to gcc 4.7, at which point schroot failed to build. Official build results can be seen here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3668529 Specifically, the compile err

Bug#612510: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#612510: Bug#612510: build issue with boost 1.46

2011-02-10 Thread Zach Carter
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 05:10:06 am Roger Leigh wrote: > OK, it proved not to require a configure check, just a conditional to > check the provided filesystem version. Could you try the attached > patch and see if it builds correctly for you? Verified, it applies and builds fine with boost

Bug#612510: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#612510: build issue with boost 1.46

2011-02-08 Thread Zach Carter
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 02:49:01 pm Roger Leigh wrote: > > sbuild-chroot-config.cc: In member function 'void > > sbuild::chroot_config::add_config_directory(const string&, const > > string&)': sbuild-chroot-config.cc:170:49: error: no matching function > > for call to > > 'std::basic_string:

Bug#612510: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#612510: build issue with boost 1.46

2011-02-08 Thread Zach Carter
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 02:17:12 pm Roger Leigh wrote: > The provided patch doesn't build with Boost 1.42, and I'd like to > have backward compatibility if possible. The final .string() is > not required to build with 1.42, and this might also be the case > with 1.64. Please could you let

Bug#612510: build issue with boost 1.46

2011-02-08 Thread Zach Carter
Package: schroot Version: 1.4.19 When I build schroot with boost 1.46, I get this error: sbuild-chroot-config.cc: In member function 'void sbuild::chroot_config::add_config_directory(const string&, const string&)': sbuild-chroot-config.cc:170:32: error: 'class boost::filesystem3::directory_entr

Bug#605939: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#605939: Bug#605939: Bug#605939: Bug#605939: Regression: Chroots with periods in the name no longer work.

2010-12-06 Thread Zach Carter
On Sunday 05 December 2010 13:25:57 Roger Leigh wrote: > Can anyone see any downside from being this permissive, or any > security implication I've not seen? (I'm only looking at pathname- > based security exploits here--is there anything else we need to > worry about?) Like lvm, it might be wise

Bug#593256: Uses deprecated "priority" key by default

2010-08-16 Thread Zach Carter
Package: schroot Version: 1.4.8 When I create a persistent schroot session, and I do not specify the priority, the default priority is set to 0. Later on when I access the session, I get multiple warnings about using a deprecated key. Example, a simple chroot, with no priority defined: [cat

Bug#589889: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#589889: Bug#589889: schroot: session names being inconsistently restricted

2010-08-09 Thread Zach Carter
On Saturday 07 August 2010 02:43:13 Roger Leigh wrote: > I just need to work out how to disable boost::regex::collate; is there > an inverse of that option? Since it's enabled by default for > extended regexes, I'm not sure how to turn this off. indeed, from the faq: "[Note - when regex_constant

Bug#589889: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#589889: Bug#589889: schroot: session names being inconsistently restricted

2010-08-09 Thread Zach Carter
On Saturday 07 August 2010 02:43:13 Roger Leigh wrote: > > Just some additional background info. When I was troubleshooting this > > issue I noticed some inconsistent behavior in the boost regex > > logic. Some of my session names were allowed, and some were not, and I > > was banging my head ag

Bug#589889: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#589889: schroot: session names being inconsistently restricted

2010-07-22 Thread Zach Carter
On Thursday 22 July 2010 02:04:52 Roger Leigh wrote: > Agreed on all counts and the patch looks great. I'll review it in > more detail when I have time at the weekend and make a new release > then. Cool! thanks. Just some additional background info. When I was troubleshooting this issue I not

Bug#589889: schroot: session names being inconsistently restricted

2010-07-21 Thread Zach Carter
Package: schroot Version: 1.4.7 Severity: important schroot allows me to create a persistent session with a particular name, such as "zcarter-catalan-build-cb67j4yZoS-16646". However, when I attempt to access it later on, it fails like this: $ /usr/bin/schroot -p -v -r -c zcarter-catalan-bu

Bug#589658: schroot: configure.ac boost function header issue

2010-07-19 Thread Zach Carter
Package: schroot Version: 1.4.2 In the fedora build system, the ./configure process fails with this error: configure: error: libboost_program_options (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot It doesn't seem to fail on my local build machine, but it does in the

Bug#584961: schroot: lvm-snapshot device lock permission failure

2010-06-07 Thread Zach Carter
Package: schroot Version: 1.2.3 Severity: normal When a non-root user is accessing an lvm snapshot chroot, the call to lockdev is made with insufficient permissions, resulting in this error: E: test-f13-401b1c48-570f-48bb-8389-4b6d44f18577: Failed to lock chroot: /dev/fastvg/f13lv: Failed to lo

Bug#583504: schroot: non-uuid formatted chroot names do not work with lvm snapshots

2010-05-27 Thread Zach Carter
Package: schroot Version: 1.4.2 Severity: normal When compiled without uuid support, schroot creates chroot names that include colon characters in them. When creating a snapshot based on those names, the lvcreate command fails like this: E: 05lvm: Logical volume name "f12-2010-05-27T20:35:13

Bug#491358: additional info

2008-07-18 Thread Zach Carter
I am using these packages: # gcc 3 gcc-3.4.6-9 libgcc-3.4.6-9 gcc-c++-3.4.6-9 # also tried gcc 4 gcc4-4.1.2-14.EL4 gcc4-c++-4.1.2-14.EL4 make-3.80-6.EL4 pam-devel-0.77-66.23 boost-devel-1.32.0-6.rhel4 lockdev-devel-1.0.1-6.2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Bug#491358: schroot: error when using schroot -p option (E: Empty expression)

2008-07-18 Thread Zach Carter
Package: schroot Version: 1.1.6 Severity: normal When using the -p option, schroot exits with this error: E: Empty expression [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ schroot -c bering -- uname -a I: [bering-2008-07-19T04:58:47Z-13217 chroot] Running command: “uname -a” Linux nerf 2.4.21-47.0.1.EL #1 Thu Oct 19 11