Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 19:23 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> El 7/5/24 a las 18:50, Uecker, Martin escribió:
> > Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> > > El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió:
> > > In the meantime, I beca
Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió:
> > I can apply the patch, but I do not have much time now.
> > Is there some urgency?
>
> Hello. A lot of time passed without activity on this bug.
>
>
>
>
> Am 01.01.23 um 15:55 schrieb Uecker, Martin:
> >
> > One could just relax (or simply remove) the test from bullseye
> > or packport the version bookworm.
>
> I guess that would be applying 0003-relax-failing-unit-test.patch
> to the Bullseye version.
One could just relax (or simply remove) the test from bullseye
or packport the version bookworm.
The wine code is broken (it violates the effective types
rules of ISO C).
Martin
Am Sonntag, dem 01.01.2023 um 15:39 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Übelacker:
> Dear Maintainer,
> I could reproduce this fa
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:23:25 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?=
wrote:
> Package: octave-bart
> Version: 0.7.00-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Control: block 1009865 by -1
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The autopkgtest for octave-bart fails against octave 7.1.0-2 recently uploaded
> to
Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:30:20PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > May be I misunderstood you - but if you do not run the test at all
> > (as done in some architectures) how will you know whether the test
> > might fail? May be I
Hi Andreas,
Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 09:45 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 05:50:34PM +0000, Uecker, Martin wrote:
> > > I'm not sure whether this is a good idea in general. If
> > > we can be sure that for s390x there
Am Samstag, den 19.09.2020, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 01:15:47PM +0000, Uecker, Martin wrote:
> > > The severity on this bug can be downgraded, however the FTBFS on s390x
> > > remains a release critical bug, since s390
Hi Graham,
Am Samstag, den 19.09.2020, 14:04 +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 13:51, Uecker, Martin
> wrote:
> > Could severity be downgraded?
>
> The severity on this bug can be downgraded, however the FTBFS on s390x
> remains a release critical
Could severity be downgraded?
(The build on s390x seems to use a newer compiler.
The failure may be a compiler bug, but similar to
the RISC-V bug I can't investigate as I never got
access to porter boxes.)
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:05:16 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: tags -1 normal
>
>
Hi Andreas,
we will need to re-upload the bart package
to export the missing files. I will prepare a new
upload.
Best,
Martin
Am Donnerstag, den 03.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Martin,
>
> can you please have a look?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Wed, May 02
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Uecker
* Package name: bart
Version : 0.2.09
Upstream Author : Martin Uecker
* URL : https://mrirecon.github.io/bart/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : tools for computational magnetic reso
12 matches
Mail list logo
