Am 23.07.19 um 17:57 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 16:51 -0400, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>> Package: general
>> Followup-For: Bug #932769
>>
>> Could you privide a recipe on how to reproduce this? There's a lot of
>> very special setup below, that someone wwould need large amounts of
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: normal
After upgrading from lenny to squeeze, one of the vserver guests failed to start. It's
root directory had, in contrast to all the other vservers it's "barrier" flag
set:
vhost:/var/lib# showattr vservers
Bui- vservers
bui- vs
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
I'm subscribed to the RSS feed of the new packages page [1]. However
recently (for two weeks or so?) the same entries keep on reapearing
again and again and agin in the RSS feed. Is it been regenerated
very frequently recently, with article IDs changing eve
I'm still seeing this problem under squeeze: sometimes after wakeup my
screen just remains black.
* the system is still alive after wakeup
* changing back and forth between vt1 and vt2 doesn't change anything
* neither dmesg nor the X.log show anything weird
* I've now upgradeed to v2.4.23-0.0 o
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Since I haven't been using screenie for a few years, I'd be glad if an
active user would adopt it.
Thanks,
*t
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: whyteboard
Severity: minor
The Homepage field in the package description says whytebboard.org with
two 'b's. It's one 'b' only :-)
*t
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32
The patch suggested in the sane-devel mailing list [1] by Nicolas
Martin fixes the scanning problem on my Pixma MP600.
I would be very glad if you, and any other readers of these bugreports
that are affected by the problem could try whether that patch fixes their
problems and report it to 585.
Hello Adam and Vincent,
I've made some progress on the xsane problems [1,2] and isolated the
problematic commit. I've moved the discussion to the sane-devel list,
however I will unfortunately not be able to proceed due to not having
access to my problematic Pixma MP600 for a few days.
So mea
Hello,
if you want to get the xsane bug fixed then I think it could help if you'd
try to answer the questions in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582066#24
With Julien's help I was able to bisect the commits to the sane-backends
git repository until I found the problematic
Bug http://bugs.debian.org/498532 looks very similar as
http://bugs.debian.org/585887
If they're the same bug, then I'd suggest continuing discussion there
(http://bugs.debian.org/585887).
*t
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
This looks very similar to http://bugs.debian.org/498532
Like in http://bugs.debian.org/585887 I can press "Preview" in xsane and
that works. However as soon as I press "Scan" I get the "Operation was
cancelled" popup.
As in #498532 both xscaneimage and quiteinsane can scan without
percievab
You wrote in http://bugs.debian.org/601732 :
How can one tell whether the bug is in xserver-xorg-video-intel or in
the kernel?
I think that going through the document [1]
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/suspend-resume.html
could help you narrow down the problem a bit?
*t
[1] suggested by Cy
In http://bugs.debian.org/570517 you reported a resume problem. The latest
sqeeze kernel contains specific Radeon fixes:
* [x86] radeon: Add quirks to make HP nx6125 and dv5000 laptops resume
(Closes: #583968)
Does your problem still occur with the latest squeeze kernel?
*t
--
To UNSUB
Does the bug reported in http://bugs.debian.org/575175 still occur with
the lastest sqeeze kernel?
Could you add the output of:
$ lspci -vv
to the bugreport?
*t
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
In http://bugs.debian.org/601081 you report a resume failure on a i915
system with kernel v2.6.32-25. However v2.6.32-27 contains spefically
fixes for i915 systems:
* Add drm changes from 2.6.32.24+drm33.11:
- i915: return -EFAULT if copy_to_user fails.
- drm/i915: Prevent double dpms
You write:
please advise me on what more specific information to gather
I think it'd be useful, if the bugreport contained HW specifics i.e.:
$ lspci -vv
*t
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
16 matches
Mail list logo
