Bug#419948: [rrd-developers] Bug#419948: librrds-perl: Information about affected platform

Hi All, I have spent considerable time improving the graph performance in the latest 1.4.x editions ... one major cause of slowdown was 'font selection'. Depending on the number of fonts on your system this can take a long time ... if you generate multiple graphs with a single instance of rrdtoo

Bug#659899: CVE-2012-0790: XSS

Folks, Yesterday Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi! > > On 16/03/13 21:53, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:47:54PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > >> [...] But how about the attached patch for > >> unstable? > > Thank you for that. It does seem like the right way to

Bug#663505: [rrd-developers] Bug#663505: rrdcached segfaults - not checked realpath and strdup

Hi Sebastian, thanks ... patch is applied as r2285 cheers tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > forwarded 663505 rrd-develop...@lists.oetiker.ch > thanks > > Hi, > > forwarding to the RRDtool developers mailing list. Summary for the > reference: RRDCacheD segfaults at startup if the journal direc

Bug#573299: [rrd-developers] Bug#573299: rrdtool: ERROR: unknown option 'M'

Hi Sebastian, thanks ... I integrated it in r2033 cheers tobi Yesterday Sebastian Harl wrote: > tags 573299 + patch pending > thanks > > Hi, > > (This is a follow-up to Debian bug #573299 -- see > for details.) > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:17:20PM +0100, Ralf H

Bug#419948: [rrd-developers] Bug#419948: librrds-perl: Information about affected platform

Hi Sebastian, Yesterday Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 05:38:40PM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > (This is a follow-up to Debian bug report #419948 -- see > > > <http://bugs.debian.org/419948> f

Bug#419948: [rrd-developers] Bug#419948: librrds-perl: Information about affected platform

Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi Florian and Carl, > > (This is a follow-up to Debian bug report #419948 -- see > for details.) > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:54:06PM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:32:52AM +0200, Florian Schlichting wrot

Bug#573638: [rrd-developers] Bug#573638: rrdtool: rrdcgi crashes at printlasttime()

Hi Robert, Yesterday Robert Luberda wrote: > Tobias Oetiker writes: > > Hi Tobias, > > > in 2012:2013 I put in the patch below ... this should provide a > > more generic fix for the problem. rrd_cgi functions all used to > > fail horribly when a librrd function

Bug#573638: [rrd-developers] Bug#573638: rrdtool: rrdcgi crashes at printlasttime()

Hi Robert, in 2012:2013 I put in the patch below ... this should provide a more generic fix for the problem. rrd_cgi functions all used to fail horribly when a librrd function tried to touch ARGV[0] (mostly to print an errror message including the name name of the calling program) ... obviously a

Bug#543631: [rrd-developers] Bug#543631: rrdupdate does not support floating point values with DERIVE, COUNTER

Hi Sebastian, Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:12:38AM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Dec 28 Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > (This is a follow-up to Debian [bug543631].) > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:00:22AM +00

Bug#543631: [rrd-developers] Bug#543631: rrdupdate does not support floating point values with DERIVE, COUNTER

Hi Florian, Today Florian Weimer wrote: > * Tobias Oetiker: > > > OTOH with long long being available across the board, this might be > > a bit of a anachronism ... not quite sure though, what happens when > > you diff two doubles realy close to 2^64 ... does this stay

Bug#543631: [rrd-developers] Bug#543631: rrdupdate does not support floating point values with DERIVE, COUNTER

Dec 28 Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi, > > (This is a follow-up to Debian [bug543631].) > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:00:22AM +, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Floating point values are supported with GAUGE. This suprising > > behavior is not clearly documented, as far as I can tell. I don't > > thi

Bug#560562: smokeping: FTBFS: parse: No such file or directory at ./../util/fix-pod2html.pl line 25.

Hi Niko, looking good ... please commit. cheers tobi Today Niko Tyni wrote: > tag 560562 confirmed patch upstream > thanks > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:57:54AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: smokeping > > Version: 2.3.6-4 > > Severity: serious > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org >

Bug#550919: [rrd-developers] Bug#550919: two more typos

Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 03:31:38PM -0700, Justin T Pryzby wrote: > > two more typos in 3 places: > > > > s/you/your/ > > rrdtutorial.1.gz:fridge and whatever you imagination can come up with > > Tobi, I'm not going to send a patch for that - it's less effort i

Bug#550919: [rrd-developers] [PATCH] Fixed various typos in the manpages.

Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Thanks to Justin T. Pryzby for reporting this in Debian bug #550919. thanks too ... I have added it cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 -- To UN

Bug#332766: [rrd-developers] rrdtool: update fails on negative timestamp

nt_time) * 1e6f); } this should take care of the problem ... cheers tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:57:30PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:11:57PM +0200, Sebastian

Bug#529291: [rrd-developers] Bug#529291: rrdtool python bindings leak memory

thanks will add tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > tags 529291 + upstream > thanks > > Hi Anders, > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote: > > The python bindings for the calls rrd_info, rrd_graph_v and rrd_update_v > > do not properly release references to some obj

Bug#251701: [rrd-developers] Bug#251701: fix #182217 breaks librrdp-perl

Hi Sebastian, Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:00:50PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:47:58PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > > Yesterday Sebastian Harl wrot

Bug#251701: [rrd-developers] Bug#251701: fix #182217 breaks librrdp-perl

Hi Sebastian, Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:47:58PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Yesterday Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 07:32:38AM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > > Otherwhise the sol

Bug#332766: [rrd-developers] rrdtool: update fails on negative timestamp

Hi Sebastian, Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi again, > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:11:57PM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 07:35:30PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:

Bug#251701: [rrd-developers] fix #182217 breaks librrdp-perl

Hi Sebastian, Yesterday Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:34:08PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 07:25:47PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > > adding a newline after t

Bug#251701: [rrd-developers] fix #182217 breaks librrdp-perl

Hi Sebastian, Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 07:25:47PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > By now (rrdtool 1.3), the problem is the following: > > > > > &

Bug#332766: [rrd-developers] rrdtool: update fails on negative timestamp

Sebastian, hmmm I didn't know of this 'feature' what time would '-5:42' be ? cheers tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > tags 332766 + upstream > thanks > > Hi, > > (This is a follow-up to Debian bug #332766. See [1] for more details.) > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/332766 > > On Sat, Oct 08, 20

Bug#251701: [rrd-developers] fix #182217 breaks librrdp-perl

Hi Sebastian, Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > > > > By now (rrdtool 1.3), the problem is the following: > > > > > > RRDp::read() expects the output to be terminated by a line matching > > > "^OK()?". However, when outputting a PNG, the > > > output is most likely not terminated by a newline, so

Bug#251701: [rrd-developers] fix #182217 breaks librrdp-perl

Hi Sebastian, the graphv interface outputs the graph in a 'sane' way so that RRDp could capture it if it was enhanced accordingly ... cheers tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi, > > (This is a follow-up to Debian bug report #251701 [1]. The text also > mentions bug report #182217, which can b

Bug#255720: [rrd-developers] python2.3-rrd: would like to capture image written to standard out

Note that the graphv interface will get you the graph back into a variable which then lets you do whatever you want with it ... cheers tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi, > > (This is a follow-up to Debian bug report #255720 - please see > http://bugs.debian.org/255720 for details.) > > I've

Bug#494221: [rrd-developers] Bug is actually in librrd4, backtrace included

Hi Sebastian, Today Sebastian Harl wrote: [...] > The attached patch should solve this issue. I've simply added a check if > we're already passed the end of the file. Since I do not have access to > a sparc box, I'd like to get some feedback if that really solves the > issue. Also, I'd like Tobi

Bug#499349: [rrd-developers] Bug#499349: librrds-perl: RRDs takes too much memory

Hi Sebastian, There were some hefty memory leaks in rrdtool 1.3.1 they are fixed in 1.3.3 ... cheers tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > tags 499349 + upstream > thanks > > Hi, > > (This is a follow-up to Debian bug #499349 [1]. Please keep > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc'ed when replying.) > > [1] htt

Bug#497739: [rrd-developers] Bug#497739: rrdtool: rrdgraph no longer drops all directories given in filename argument when imginfo string prints

Sebastian, it is a bug ... fixed in svn ... cheers tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > tags 497739 + upstream > thanks > > Hi, > > (This is a follow-up to Debian bug #497739. See [1] for more details.) > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/497739 > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:57:54PM -0700, bardia wr

Bug#493553: [rrd-developers] Bug#493553: rrdtool: broken with non-UTF8 locales: Invalid UTF-8 string passed to pango_layout_set_text()

Hi Sebastian, cool ... thanks ... I have included cheers tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > tags 493553 + patch pending > thanks > > Hi, > > On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 09:29:10AM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote: > > When invoking rrdtool graph in an environment with non-UTF8 locale (like > > my et_EE.ISO-

Bug#428780: [rrd-developers] rrdtool: update crash

Hi Sebastian, thanks ... added tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > tags 428780 + patch > retitle 428780 rrdtool create: Missing command line verification. > thanks > > Hi Justin, > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 10:09:25PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > $ rrdtool create --start 108000 foo.rrd DS:

Bug#450578: [rrd-developers] rrdtool-1.3rc6 is out

l - they are meant > for the Debian bug-tracking system.) > > Thanks for your reply! > > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 05:55:20PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > the root cause of the problem is that > > > > static char rrd_error[MAXLEN] = "\0"; > > static cha

Bug#450578: Info received ([rrd-developers] rrdtool-1.3rc6 is out)

* - * RRDtool 1.2.15 Copyright by Tobi Oetiker, 1997-2006 + * RRDtool 1.2.16 Copyright by Tobi Oetiker, 1997-2006 * This file: Copyright 2003 Peter Stamfest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * & Tobias Oetiker * Distributed under the GPL @@ -14,20 +14,26 @@ #define MAXL

Bug#450578: [rrd-developers] rrdtool-1.3rc6 is out

Hi Sebastian, oh ... this bugreport did not reach me ... can you please mail it to me directly ... thanks tobi Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:05:45AM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Unless there are new bugreports, this is the latst rc releas

Bug#461228: Info received (kernel-package does not deal with x86 architecture change in 2.6.24)

it seems this patch is only creect in theory :-(. copying arch/x86/Makefile_* and fixing the asm link to point to asm-x86 is all that is required, but I feel sort of lost kernel-package code ... :-( tobi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Bug#461228: kernel-package does not deal with x86 architecture change in 2.6.24

Hi, the problem is that the kernel-package does not deal with the new header structure due to the x86 architecture merge in 2.6.24 it applies to kernel-package 10.x cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten http://it.oetiker.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++41 62 213 9902-

Bug#457071: smokeping: Javascript error: $("zoom") has no properties

lement is present, or > > better yet, simply do not include smokeping-zoom.js on this page > > if it is not used. > > Hi, > > thanks for your report. I'm forwarding it to Tobias Oetiker, who wrote > this part of the code. > > Tobi, please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] C

Bug#346004: iostream can't do files > 2GB

Package: libstdc++5-3.3 Version: 3.3.5-13 When I run this program: big.cc: - #include #include using namespace std; int main() { ofstream test("/scratch/bigfile.txt"); for (long i = 0; i < 15; i++) { test << i; } test.close(); return 0; } --

Bug#292948: wml: -D defines are ignored in the -E and -P filenames

Package: wml Version: 2.0.8-10 Severity: important Tags: patch I use a pre and a postprocessing script for my wml setup. I want to specify the location of these scripts relative to the location of the wml tree. I want to be able to use the following .wmlrc -DROOT~. -E $(ROOT)/bin/htmlfix.sh -P