> Furthermore, tex.web and mf.web are under an even more "restrictive"
> license.
This is "blessed" by rms, because of the change file machanism we have.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > +++ plbib.bib 2006-04-08 21:44:53.0 -0400
...
> > -% According to Staszek Wawrykiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, these files
>
> Do you know whether the file is still maintained by Staszek, or should
> we just upload this or an other fix to CTAN?
I have no idea if Staszek has ever mainta
> I can put it back.
Yes, that would be good, thanks.
> I guess TETEXDIR is always specified as an absolute path?
Yes.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sounds reasonable to me. Thomas, Olaf?
Ok for me.
Ha! All this reminds me to
TEXMF_CNF = $SELFAUTODIR:$SELFAUTOPARENT:/.$TETEXDIR
which I have had in teTeX-0.2.1:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/tetex-0.2/kpse-2.4/kpathsea> ls -l texmf.cnf.in
-rw-r--r-- 1 te users 3007 1994-10-31 14:11
> $ kpsewhich --expand-var='$TEXMFCNF'
> {/usr/bin,/usr,/}{,{/share,}/texmf{-local,}/web2c}::/usr/share/texmf/web2c:/usr/share/texmf/web2c
> $ kpsewhich --expand-braces='$TEXMFCNF'
> /usr/bin:/usr:/:/usr/bin/share/texmf-local/web2c:/usr/share/texmf-local/web2c://share/texmf-local/web2c:/usr/bin/tex
> : ${KPSE_DOT=$thisdir}
> export KPSE_DOT
The reason for me to implement KPSE_DOT in all kind of scripts (mktexpk,
fmtutil etc.) was to try to immitate a regular call of mf / tex as close
as possible. I.e. people might have a local hyphenation pattern file
which they could use via
tex -ini
> fmtutil sets and exports TEXINPUTS="$tmpdir:$TEXINPUTS", but that is not
> sufficient. One has to set TEXFORMATS, too. I therefore suggest the
> following patch, based on teTeX-3.0's version:
>
> I don't see why not. Thomas?
Sure, good patch. Thanks, Frank.
Thomas
--
To UNSUB
> i used cyrtexinfo format at least to allow russian hyphenation for texinfo.
That is a good reason. I have reverted the line (commented out) in
my fmtutil.in.
Thanks for your explanation!
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
Hi Frank+Thomas,
> Therefore, besides TEXMFLOCAL and the users' texmf trees, I'd like to
> have the possibility to include information that other packages¹ have
> dropped into /usr/share/texmf/texdoctk/, or into $TEXMFCONFIG/texdoctk
> if you prefer that.
I don't think that maintaining large te
Hi Frank,
[sorry for the fullquote. It is to set Werner + Vladimir into the context]
> Hallo Thomas, Karl,
>
> fmtutil.in contains the line:
>
> #! cyrtexinfo pdfetex language.dat-translate-file=cp227.tcx
> *cyrtxinf.ini
>
> Do you know for what purpose this format is used? texi
> | Sun Mar 28 13:14:45 CEST 2004
> | [...]
> | * clean up texk/tetex/Makefile for manpage symlinks (initex, virtex
> |etc. are no longer installed, so we don't need manpages for this).
You can look up the discussion on the texlive list archives -- or try
to find this information in the web2
> Donald has uploaded a fixed version to CTAN. Please consider to
> include the new version into teTeX upon next release.
Done.
Mo Aug 29 19:09:17 CEST 2005
* update placeins
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
> man -l src/Packages/tetex-bin/tetex-bin-3.0/new-manpages/updmap.cfg.5
> with K\(:uster as you provided it, I only see:
I see the right thing, if I run
groff -man -Tps updmap.cfg.5 | gv -
I think, that it is a matter of the backend (and man users the acsii
backend, I guess) to support umlauts
> Hilmar has written a manpage for updmap (some refinement by me), I
> attach it.
Thanks a lot, I have added it into my tree and submitted to TeX Live.
> If you know how to get an umlaut into my name in
> manpages...
Hilmar's solution seems to be good enough for debian (which has groff).
Since
> Thomas, Olaf is that intended as the main functionality of the
> program should be implemented by pdftk (function unpack_files)?
pdftosrc is a small program build on top of the xpdf libraries, so it
uses the same code for accessing pdf objects as pdftex. I'd say that
if the pdftex maintainers ar
> This is why I'm contacting you, Thomas: Although according to the
> CHANGES file we should have xpdf-3.00 just as the xpdf package has, but
> at least one file (which should be patched) is missing in the teTeX
> sources.
The following changes are done to the original sources:
- xpdf/GlobalPara
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 05:29:03PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> your reasons), we'll make that specific to Debian and either:
Yes, please do this.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I just plan not to add the new file to the source tree. The
> > existing files which are part of the original distribution can
> > stay.
> As far as I understood the submitter, that file is not new, but
> would be an replacement.
That does not make a difference to me. I don't plan to add this
> > That file exists in the tetex-src area and it could be installed
> > from there. I'll pass this to Olaf Weber (web2c maintainer).
> Thanks.
We have agreed that I just copy that file into my texmf tree.
> > While there are a few emacs lisp files that are distributed in
> > teTeX, I don't think
> babel doc. Please consider to update babel upon next teTeX revision.
Yes, will do.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I would not use and I am not using pdfTeX with seminar, too many problems.
>
> Do you mean this in the sense that we should not even support users who
> still do it, and not put anything for pdfTeX in the conffile?
If someone comes up with a good solution for pdftex, I'll add that code,
of co
21 matches
Mail list logo
