Sorry, I confused -p and -q!
In any case, since this is called at installs, *no *prompting is allowed,
and it totally breaks an install when it comes up.
The -p option "Fixes errors but does not report them." (
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pseries/v5r3/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.aix.cmd
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Nicolas François <
nicolas.franc...@centraliens.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:37:47PM -0700, t...@becket.net wrote:
> >
> > /sbin/shadowconfig from the passwd package uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p".
> On
> > some other systems, the -p flag to
Package: passwd
Version: 1:4.1.4.2+svn3283-2+squeeze1
Severity: important
/sbin/shadowconfig from the passwd package uses "pwck -p" and "grpck -p". On
some other systems, the -p flag to these programs says to silently fix
problems found in those files.
But the Debian versions do not actually do t
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 15:44 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > 2) Either upstream or in a Debian-specific API to be removed in the
> > future--I.E. something not in a public header--we could provide some
> > exception path for AFS.
>
> I talked to Tom on the phone about this today and proposed an addi
01-15 at 11:11 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
>
> Thomas> This bug was propagated to the *stable* release because of
> Thomas> the recent (minor) security issue.
>
>
> Thomas, I'm having a ha
This bug was propagated to the *stable* release because of the recent
(minor) security issue.
And *that's* an unmitigated disaster. It is very very not ok for
security patches in Debian to include *anything* which could break in
such a way. The security team and the krb5 maintainers did not revi
retitle 539841 Please package Chicken 4.2
thanks
Hi Davide; a few months ago I asked about packaging Chicken Scheme 4.1
for Debian, and you said it would be ready in a few days. Chicken 4.2
is now out... Is there an ETA?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.de
ere is no other way to get the same information.)
Perhaps the switch to Webkit is foolish, but that's a different order of
problem. :)
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 23:31 +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 19:23 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > In the new epiphany
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 07:22:00PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Package: epiphany-browser
> > Version: 2.28.0-4
> > Severity: important
> >
> > --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> >
> > The recent update to epiphany-bro
Package: epiphany-browser
Version: 2.28.0-4
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
After upgrading to the new epiphany-browser, the web-page-specified font
of "sans serif" for (for example) Wikipedia is being ignored. It used
to display in sans serif, which is what
Package: epiphany-browser
Version: 2.28.0-4
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
In the new epiphany browser, my existing java and realplayer plugins stop
working.
Indeed, "about:plugins" shows nothing at all.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kerne
Package: epiphany-browser
Version: 2.28.0-4
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
The recent update to epiphany-browser doesn't have any of my saved
history, passwords, or other information. That's a serious problem.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Package: epiphany-browser
Version: 2.28.0-4
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
New version of epiphany-browser lacks "open in new tab" on the right-button
menu.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686
Debian Release: sq
I am not only in approval of Micha's NMU, but if he judges a version
upgrade of gnucash to be suitable and is interested in preparing that
NMU, I approve that too.
Thomas
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 19:17 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 01.09.2009, 15:18 +0200 schrieb Micha
Package: chicken
Severity: wishlist
Please package Chicken 4.1, just released. (And 4.0 has been out for a
while, and has lots of good stuff.)
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
tags 527014 -fixed-upstream
thanks
The upstream patch does not fix the complete problem described in this
Debian bug report. The patch addresses the case where name collisions
happen by truncation, but not other cases.
Some uniquification needs to happen beyond this "randomly change
filenames" s
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 14:06 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> severity 524023 grave
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> As lilypond simply does not work in unstable, I'm raising the
> severity to grave. The patch mentionned in the bug report files works
> perfectly fine. I hereby announce my intention to
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 21:00 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Please remove gtk+1.2 from unstable. The last upstream release was 8
> years ago, and there isn’t any kind of maintenance happening on it,
> either upstream or in Debian.
>
> This will im
force-merge 520055 519148
thanks
Already reported, and the fix is in incoming now.
Thomas
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 13:28 -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: gnucash
> Version: 2.2.6-2
> Severity: important
>
> When I open GnuCash and try to open an account, GnuCash has a
> segmentation fault. Th
I hope to be able to work on it this weekend.
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 11:56 +1100, John Zaitseff wrote:
> Dear Thomas,
>
> I can guess that, like all of us, you have been very busy lately.
> Any idea when LilyPond 2.12 (now 2.12.2) will be packaged for Debian
> Sid? I am certainly looking forward
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 19:04 +0100, Jérémy Verda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Lenny has been released on 14 February so Debian is not anymore in
> freeze now.
>
> So could you update it please?
I expect to upload a new version this weekend.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.d
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 18:29 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> retitle 505380 "New upstream version 2.2.8"
> thanks
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> just FYI, gncuash 2.2.8 is out now. Especially the there-fixed bug
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548978 is bugging me. A new
> upload will be apprecia
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 14:45 +0100, Mark Van den Borre wrote:
> For what it's worth, Lilypond 2.12 is out since 2008/12/27 .
Yep, which is awesome. Because of the freeze in Debian, I can't upload
it until the release happens.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:19 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> snapshot builds of 2.6.27 are already available - see the wiki page
> Bastian directed you to. Obviously that's not the same as being in the
> archive proper, but that's not going to happen till after lenny.
Yes, and I'm grateful to Bastian
ubject: Re: Bug#508493: [linux-2.6] please package 2.6.27
> > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:38:56 +0100
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:59:23AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > 2.6.27 has been out a while, and has some fixes that might help problems
> > > o
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
2.6.27 has been out a while, and has some fixes that might help problems on my
hardware.
Would be awesome if it were packaged up.
Thomas
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 17:21 +1100, John Zaitseff wrote:
> Of course, and I agree with you, but I thought perhaps putting it in
> the "experimental" branch until the actual 2.12.0 release wouldn't
> hurt...
No, but there's only so much time available on my end. There hasn't
been much hue and cry f
> The main reason for asking is that the LilyPond project plans to
> release a 2.12 version soon, and I'd like to check my collection of
> over 500 LilyPond documents BEFORE that happens...
Feel free to do so, but I think Debian's users are best supported by
packaging the stable software, and not
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 11:19 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
> I'll investigate the precise answer to this question. But please be
> patient, I'm quite busy with real life this month...
I'm in no rush.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:54 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
> This is an absolute no-go. If installed the AqBanking library *needs*
> those files in order to work properly. Hence I reassigned the bug back
> to Gnucash.
I'm a little confused about one point here. Why does the library need a
list of all b
Package: libdb-ruby1.9
Version: 0.6.5-2
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Most of the documentation for libdb-ruby1.9 is missing: there is the
bdb.html page, but the real documentation is in the "docs" subdir which
is not included, and which bdb.html links to.
-
Package: libdb-ruby1.8
Version: 0.6.5-2
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Most of the documentation for libdb-ruby1.8 is missing: there is the
bdb.html page, but the real documentation is in the "docs" subdir which
is not included, and which bdb.html links to.
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 22:48 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> I didn't wait at all, I informed maintainers at the beginning of the
> cycle, though if at the end of the cycle there are too much versions (5
> in this case) of a library we can either remove the whole lot that
> depends on them or make them
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 07:56 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> tags 500615 + patch
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for mmorph (versioned as 2.3.4.2-11.1) and uploaded it
> to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Yes, please remove it from the upload q
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:15 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> I apologize then. I'm posting these patches/NMUs for my NM
> application; the AM application was worded in a way that suggested I
> should post it in the form of an NMU. Again, I didn't mean to offend
> or step on anybodies toes, so I d
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:02 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> I had no intent to upload and no intent to have this change migrated
> from sid to lenny, I posted the NMU as a convince to you to so you
> won't have to make the changes yourself. In general, I felt that
> providing a debdiff would mak
Three copies of a buggy patch are not necessary, especially for a
trivial bug report. It is necessary that you not upload without
speaking to me directly. I hope I've been clear.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:22 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> In one of those epic, I fail moments, the patch got truncated, but I
> didn't catch it until I went to look at the bug again. Here's the full
> patch with the updated build-deps. Sorry about that.
Um, this NMU is, I believe, inapproria
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:22 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> In one of those epic, I fail moments, the patch got truncated, but I
> didn't catch it until I went to look at the bug again. Here's the full
> patch with the updated build-deps. Sorry about that.
Oh, and of course, it's not even a bug
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 23:39 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> > There are far better error codes to return.
>
> ... what error codes listed in the link(2) manpage do you think of?
> The best one that comes to my mind is EPERM: "The filesystem containing
> oldpath and newpath does not support the creation
The logic expressed in the #gnucash discussion is bogus. Errors like
ENLNK or EMLNK would also prevent link but not prevent copying. There
is no harm in at least trying copying if EROFS comes in, and the code
shouldn't assume that every error on link will be an error on copying.
Thomas
--
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 20:34 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:02:56PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >>> I was trying to use gnucash over sshfs, to al
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 23:14 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another reason for making HBCI support optional might be
> http://bugs.debian.org/496793
That's just a bug. We should fix it. It doesn't happen on my system or
yours... It seems exactly like an out-of-date library; thus, missing
ve
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:46 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Package: gnucash
> Version: 2.2.6-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes data loss
>
> I was trying to use gnucash over sshfs, to allow several machines to
> handle the same file. It complained that it was unable to get a lock,
> and so
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 16:17 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:41:48PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: gnucash
> > Version: 2.2.1-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hello Thomas,
> >
> > The file /usr/share/menu/gnucash reads
> > ?package(gnucash):needs="x11" section=
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 13:48 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2008-08-18 19:38:15 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > At the same time, libaqbanking-data is 2.8 MB.
>
> It's 15.8 MB.
Hrm, well, version 3.7.0-1 is much smaller:
$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/libaqbanking-
--- Begin Message ---
Thomas Bushnell BSG пишет:
You sent me this empty bug report... but if I go by the subject...
I'm not sure why (1) this is a bug, or (2) why it is important and not
normal priority, or
Because gnucash doesn't work (it doesn't start at all). All libraries in
--- Begin Message ---
Thomas Bushnell BSG пишет:
Is there an error message you would like to share with me? Please
pretend I don't know anything about the difficulties you're having and
explain everything you're doing and exactly what happens, in all detail,
with all the messag
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 11:22 +0600, Mihail Kotelnikov wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG пишет:
> > You sent me this empty bug report... but if I go by the subject...
> >
> > I'm not sure why (1) this is a bug, or (2) why it is important and not
> &g
--- Begin Message ---
Thomas Bushnell BSG пишет:
Is there an error message you would like to share with me? Please
pretend I don't know anything about the difficulties you're having and
explain everything you're doing and exactly what happens, in all detail,
with all the messag
--- Begin Message ---
It appears that you have a /etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders.32 file; I'm
not sure why. What is in that file?
Also, what is
in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loader-files.d/libgtk2.0-0.loaders?
Thomas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Thomas Bushnell BSG пишет:
You sent me this empty bug report... but if I go by the subject...
I'm not sure why (1) this is a bug, or (2) why it is important and not
normal priority, or
Because gnucash doesn't work (it doesn't start at all). All libraries in
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 19:01 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: gnucash
> Version: 2.2.6-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The upgrade to gnucash 2.2.6 needs 25.9MB of additional disk space[*],
> mainly due to aqbanking, that was added for HBCI support:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 13:36 -0400, Branden J Moore wrote:
> Package: gnucash
> Version: 2.2.4-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I tend to leave GnuCash running for weeks on end, due to slow start
> times. The "Since Last Run" function should check daily for
> transactions that it should create. Curre
See http://nopaste.debianforum.de/9635 for what might be a good patch
for this bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 18:22 -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> I wonder if it's a problem in Finance::Quote, because for at least some
> of the stocks I'm having trouble with, the Date field returned is bogus
> and the real date shows up in the 'time:' field when using a command
> like:
>
> gnc-
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 23:10 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> I'm not sure about Rolfs intention with this bug, but I assume he also
> wanted the Python bindings being packaged. Unfortunately I can't find
> them, neither in package gnucash nor in gnucash-common...
Yeah, I really have no clue.
Thomas
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 13:00 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > libchipcardc2 is a library, which recommends a package containing a
> > daemon (chipcardd4), libchipcardc2.
> >
> > Making a library depend on or recommend a daemon is rarely a good idea.
>
> The libchipcard library's ver
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 23:58 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I uploaded an NMU of your package.
>
> Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Thanks for taking care of this; I've been too busy to attend to it
myself.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 06:24 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 28.02.2008, 23:15 -0500 schrieb Thomas Bushnell BSG:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 22:03 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:38 -0500, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 22:03 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:38 -0500, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Upon further experimentation, the crash only happens if the audio device
> > cannot be opened. This often happens for me if a java web app has
> &g
Package: libofx
Severity: wishlist
--- Begin Message ---
As libxml++ 1.0 has finally been orphaned, whose upstream support
stops since 2005, I'd suggest its rdepends, libofx and passepartout,
consider to migrate to libxml++2.6, which I am maintaining, hence
CCing their maintainers. Though I haven
Package: network-manager-vpnc-gnome
Version: 0.6.4svn2806-1
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
VPN group and user passwords are no longer being remembered. I select both the
remember checkbox
and the remember for this session checkbox, and the passwords are not
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Please remove the lilypond package for sparc in unstable. I believe it's
2.10.29-1.
Guile is no longer able to support sparc (#460617), and the build failure is
preventing lilypond from
entering testing.
Upon further experimentation, the crash only happens if the audio device
cannot be opened. This often happens for me if a java web app has
played sound first, because my java grabs audio.
It used to be that in such a circumstance rhythmbox would report an
error. Now it crashes badly. So this it
Package: rhythmbox
Version: 0.10.1-1+b3
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Upon today's update in unstable rhythmbox seems to be entirely unable to
playback. This occurs for tracks in the music library (I have tried
both MP3 and OGG tracks), and for internet radio s
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 03:55 +0300, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
> What does gnucash bug #444950 has to do with qgit's number #440950?
Nothing, obviously, just a typo. Go ahead and close the bug of course.
> Thank you for removing my package from testing :(
I think nothing of the kind would have ha
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 01:57 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Package: jacal
> Severity: important
> Version: 1b8-3
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: goal-dash
>
> Hello maintainer,
>
> While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts'
> package)
> check I've found your
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
"WB" is a disk based (sorted) associative-array package with C, SCM,
Java, and C# libraries. These associative arrays consist of variable
length (0.B to 255.B) keys and values. Functions are provided to:
* create, destroy, open and close disk-files and asso
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Please remove the libofx3 binary packages from unstable so that libofx 0.9.0,
which involved an soname bump, can migrate to testing when the time is ready.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Ker
Package: gnucash
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: serious
This version of the Debian gnucash package does not support libofx. But
there is hope that the libofx licensing problems which are the root
issue may be settled. Accordingly, this non-ofx version should not
migrate into testing until we have so
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 14:45 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Package: libofx
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi
>
> (a bug to not forget this issue, together with the reject of the newer
> version from NEW).
>
> this package contains non-free files, the DTDs, at least those from the
> OFX standard, have a
Upstream libofx does not have any immediate ideas about what next steps
should be.
I am in contact with the OFX Consortium about granting a license which
we can work with.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: lintian
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
It is possible to use debconf while not needing any translation, because there
is no translatable
information in the template file. See miscfiles for an example. This happens,
for example, when
using a shared t
Package: guile-1.8
Version: 1.8.3+1-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Guile 1.8 does not build on sparc.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=guile-1.8&ver=1.8.3%2B1-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1195798674&file=log
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Ker
BTW, scm needed special stuff to get continuations to work on ia64.
Presumably you can steal the special code.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 444950
thanks
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Thomas Bushnell
I wanted to bring your attention to bug #444950 which is set to
"resolved" but which is not really fixed, the desktop icon for gnucash
is still missing. However, I made a debdiff for 2.2.3-1 which fix this,
you can take it here :
http
--- Begin Message ---
I confirm that it's not fixed too. Here's the clean debdiff patch which
fix this problem :
http://upload.leservicetechnique.com/bugs/gnucashdesktop.debdiff
--
Saïvann
--- End Message ---
Hi: I'm the Debian maintainer for libofx and for gnucash. I'm writing
to you because you are responsible (in some fashion) for the maintenance
of packages which depend on libofx.
Unfortunately, it has come to light that libofx contains non-free
software. Importantly, the DTD files which describe
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 14:45 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Package: libofx
> Severity: serious
> (a bug to not forget this issue, together with the reject of the newer
> version from NEW).
>
> this package contains non-free files, the DTDs, at least those from the
> OFX standard, have a non-free
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 15:30 +1100, Jason Thomas wrote:
> The lines between the automagic markers are auto generated and subject
> to change. You need to edit the default options between those markers
> to suit your needs. Then when you run update-grub the generated
> content
> will be correct.
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 21:41 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > What is the system like on which you are building? What processor?
> > What OS? Can you give me a complete--that is, not pruned at all--build
> > log?
>
> Full build log is attached. It was created running
>
>$ dpkg-buildpacka
This is the sort of thing that should be fixed in a stable patch
release.
The problem originates in the sarge->etch upgrade, which changed device
names from hd* to sd*; something has failed to notice that and the
results are sufficiently disastrous that a stable update seems called
for.
Thomas
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-27
Severity: serious
update-grub mutates the boot device incorrectly in producing menu.lst.
This bug, btw, caused a remote server to fail to reboot automatically
and cost me actual expense in remote debugging assistance.
Attached is menu.lst-before (which I hand-edited
OK, you said in your report that you were "reporting from Debian
machine", which I take it to mean that the failed build is not on
Debian. The scm package builds just fine on Debian; it looks as if you
are trying to build it on ubuntu. I can't support what happens when you
build the Debian packag
severity 455702 wishlist
thanks
Thanks for the bug report.
R5RS Scheme does not require signalling errors at all for a values
mismatch; so the behavior of a program which generates one is strictly
undefined. Not all errors are required to be signalled, and in R5RS,
virtually none are.
I've disc
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.10-1+b1
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
"There are now 1 update [-11]."
Enuf said.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686
Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 unstablemirrors.kernel
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.44.3-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Upon "up"grade to 8.44.3, my X server no longer knows about the proper
resolutions of my screen.
/etc/X11/xorg.conf has the following for each depth:
Modes "1920x1440" "1
It is not right IIRC to close a bug when the fix has only been uploaded
to experimental, but I'm not sure exactly how that is supposed to
interact with the new version-tracking stuff.
Anyhow, when will this move out of experimental?
Thomas
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 13:54 +, Debian Bug Tracking S
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 18:14 -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> Is there some reason why I need to keep a Gnome browser (yelp) on
> my system, just to be able to make use of Gnucash? Can't a
> person get help/access to documentation some other way.
It's the standard help browser for gnome program
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 17:02 -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> Package: gnucash-docs
> Version: 2.2.0-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Time to ditch as much Gnome as is possible. De Icaza has gone nuts.
Gnucash is a part of gnome. Can you please give more information,
rather than just asserting this?
T
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 01:04 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Package: lilypond-doc
> Version: 2.10.29-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Recent lilypond releases have seen a huge increase in the size of
> the lilypond-doc package, due to the inclusion of html
> documentation. While I find it great to be a
severity 443916 important
thanks
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 19:12 -0400, Peter Smerdon wrote:
> Package: gnucash-docs
> Version: 2.2.0-1
> Severity: normal
>
> gnucash, when starting the tutorial opens the help browser but gives me this
> warning at the top:
>
> This XML file does not appear
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:31 +1000, Jayen Ashar wrote:
> I have:
> gnucash --add-price-quotes ~/docs/Accounts.xac > /dev/null
> running in a cron job, so now I end up getting an e-mail every time
> because of this. It's extra annoying this way. As you can see, I am
> filtering out stdout, but I do
severity 443774 wishlist
thanks
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 08:47 +1000, Jayen wrote:
> Package: gnucash
> Version: 2.2.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> I get this message on stderr every time I start up gnucash now.
> gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at configure
> time.
>
>
tags 443577 = unreproducible
thanks
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 12:48 +0200, Roman Bertle wrote:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070923 11:20]:
> > On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 17:17 +0200, Roman Bertle wrote:
> > > the automatic retrieval of quotes using Finance:
reassign 443573 fvwm
tags 443573 =
retitle 443573 fvwm: gnucash dialog window getting destroyed
thanks
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 12:28 +0200, Roman Bertle wrote:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070923 11:20]:
> > tags 443573 + unreproducible moreinfo
> > thanks
>
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 16:19 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Since submitting the bug and follow-up I decided the safest thing was to
> go with the flow and make the first split match the account in the
> register. Oddly, in one case when I tried that, it kept changing the
> *second* split to the ledge
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 14:18 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Some more test results.
>
> 1. The problem doesn't seem specific to Liabilities (or account I
> created). I can get it with the default cash in wallet account.
> 2. The first split line seems to get rewritten to have the account match
> the
severity 443608 minor
thanks
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 13:35 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> This makes the program almost unusable for me. When I enter a split
> transaction it gets converted into 2 separate transactions. However,
> deleting one will delete the other.
I can reproduce this. However, y
1 - 100 of 625 matches
Mail list logo
