Bug#236611: xdvi magnifier flickers when moving

2010-12-07 Thread Stefan Ulrich
e the non-k version). No successors ever presented themselves ;-) Cheers, Stefan On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 05.12.10 Stefan Ulrich (stefan.ulr...@gmx.org) wrote: > > Hi, > > > right - xdvi is not really in 'active development' any mo

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-27 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Hi Karl, > Sounds good to me. So can you apply the patch below (or similar) to > your source for your next release? I checked it in to TL for now. Thanks for the patch; I've applied it to the CVS. > (By the way, are you planning an xdvik release any time soon, or should > we plan on going with

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-23 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... and I am wondering whether xdvizilla is useful at all for anything > Seems like it could be removed to me, but this is a question for the > xdvi maintainers. Stefan, I see you're on this list ... ? I just made a few tests with opening files from h

Bug#361080: xdvi does not display my dvi correctly

2006-04-07 Thread Stefan Ulrich
[ sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] separately because the CC didn't work ... ] Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stefan, > can you have a quick look at this bug report (the explanation is below, > the example file in the first mail)? Is it just an incarnation of the > known "PS might work

Bug#357462: tetex-bin: xdvi shrinkFactor 0 is broken

2006-03-20 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Package: tetex-bin >> Version: 3.0-14 >> Severity: normal >> >> >> When I run xdvi with the "-s 0" option, or with the resource >> "XDvi.shrinkFactor: 0" in my X defaults, the window comes up fully >> maximized instead of sized to fit the document page

Bug#320188: tetex-bin: [xdvi]

2006-03-20 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > retitle 320188 [xdvi]: search window too large This usually happens with broken .Xdefaults settings, e.g.: xdvi*geometry: 900x1000 instead of: xdvi.geometry: 900x1000 You could check the resource settings with e.g. $ appres XDvi xdvi | grep geom an

Bug#350292: xdvi: please use cntl-wheel to zoom

2006-02-02 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 28.01.06 James R. Van Zandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, >> Please use cntl-wheel to zoom, as in evince, acroread, firefox, and >> many Windows programs. That is, I would like this default resource >> setting: >> > As I don't understand so mu

Bug#342529: tetex-bin: xdvi unnecessarily noisy

2005-12-08 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > $ xdvi [Press 'r' in xdvi to reload page] > xdvi: Horizontal scrolling not possible Actually that's quite a good example for how such output *could* be helpful if users didn't ignore it ;-) 'R' reloads the file, 'r' scrolls the page to the

Bug#336400: emacs-goodies-el: please add xdvi-search.el

2005-11-03 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd also like to hear from the xdvik people what the file is meant for > (Emacs' built in TeX mode? Older AUCTeX versions?), and what they think > about integration in AUCTeX/Emacs Goodies/Whatever. Thanks for CCing me on this - I didn't know that AUCTe

Bug#295205: metapost figures in xdvi with tex text

2005-02-15 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Chris Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:00:03PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote: >> Stefan Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > There doesn't seem to be an easy way for Xdvi to detect that it's not >> > a standal