Am 12.01.2016 um 21:04 schrieb Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
> Stefan, please confirm that it's also working for you -- if you still
> experience it, we will reopen it.
Sorry for not updating the report. The issue seems to be fixed for me as
well. Thanks!
Cheers
Stefan
Hi all,
same problem here, I'm on Ubuntu 14.10 and get the same behavior.
Backtrace looks quite similar:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7435b700 (LWP 8624)]
__lll_unlock_elision (lock=0x77416940
, private=0)
at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/li
Eugen Dedu wrote:
Kilian will upload it tonight, please wait.
That's great news, thanks! Hopefully this will solve some bugs here :-D
- Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Is there any progress? In other bug reports you state that there will be
a new version available soon - what is blocking this?
Thanks a lot!
- Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Simon Josefsson schrieb:
> Thank you, I believe this is a problem with your CA certificate, it
> contains a basic constraint as follows:
>
> Certificate Authority (CA): FALSE
>
> You need to set the CA constraint to TRUE for CA certificates.
>
Oh well, thanks a lot! Creati
Hi all,
is there someone working on this? I'd really like to use 3.0.1 on i386.
Thanks!
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
te is NOT trusted
- Version: TLS1.0
- Key Exchange: RSA
- Cipher: AES-128-CBC
- MAC: SHA1
- Compression: NULL
*** Verifying server certificate failed...
- Stefan
Simon Josefsson schrieb:
> Stefan Söffing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thank you
Hi,
thank you for looking into this problem.
I just tried libgnutls26 2.4.2-4, unfortunately it doesn't solve this
problem for me, I still get
- Peer's certificate is NOT trusted
for the self-signed certificate. LDAP access is still broken.
- Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
it says:
Resolving 'thea.physik.uni-kl.de'...
Connecting to '131.246.123.113:636'...
- Certificate type: X.509
- Got a certificate list of 2 certificates.
- Certificate[0] info:
-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-
[...]
-END CERTIFICATE-
# The hostname in the
I'm sorry, but I do not have this hardware any longer...
Philippe Cloutier schrieb:
> Do you have the same problem with symlinks as Alberto Maurizi?
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: octave2.9
Version: 1:2.9.14-1
Hi,
what happened to the octave2.9-forge package? Please re-add this
package...
Do I really have to install them manually from source now?
- Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Finally there's a new release of the anjuta 2.x branch:
2.2.0 is considered STABLE
Please package this one for Debian...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh well, most of the time it works now - but sometimes it does not. But
I can't see any pattern...
I'm using initng, maybe some things get loaded it the wrong order, I
will check with sysvinit
- Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sjoerd Simons schrieb:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:38:20PM +0100, Stefan Söffing wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> same here with gnome-power-manager. No battery is reported sinc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
same here with gnome-power-manager. No battery is reported since the
last update.
Going to sleep doesn't work either...
- - Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: dhcdbd
Version: 2.0-2
Hi,
when DHCP times out (e.g. because it doesn't get a response from a
server) it tries to use the predefined static leases. DHCDBD sends a
timeout, even if a predefined lease can be used.
In my case this causes Networ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is a beta upstream release (2.1.0) available which should enter
unstable.
Thx
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFq0OBpfXh+uYP16sRAlbYAJ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there anything done on packaging a new gparted version?
- - Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFo7ZjpfXh+uYP16sRAneyAJ4ipzIQAv8s3+ocVhgg4r14W
Package: libjama-dev
Version: 1.2.4-1
In jama_eig.h (but possibly in other header files too):
using namespace std;
using namespace TNT;
is used. This carries over to all files that #include
For me, this give a naming conflict between TNT::Matrix and Matrix
(which I declared myself). The same co
Package: gnome-power-manager
Version: 2.14.3-2
Followup-For: Bug #370692
I'm sorry, but for me the problem persists - as stated above, even in
2.14.3-2.
--verbose says:
[gpm_brightness_init] gpm-brightness.c:135 (12:43:15): No devices of
capability laptop_panel
[gpm_dpms_set_enabled] gpm-dpms
Package: gnome-power-manager
Version: 2.14.3-2
Followup-For: Bug #370692
Same here with 2.14.3-2 (and gnome-screensaver 2.14.2-1) from unstable.
Is gnome-screensaver needed to get this working? (Why?)
If so, this should be mentioned somewhere...
- Stefan
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
21 matches
Mail list logo
