Bug#1032420: libtpms: diff for NMU version 0.9.2-3.1

2023-03-07 Thread Seunghun Han
Dear Salvatore, I appreciate your work. Please don't delay it and go through the process. I'm currently on an urgent project, so I have to do it for a while. Best regards, Seunghun On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 6:45 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Control: tags 1032420 + patch > Control: tags 1032

Bug#990522: libtpms: CVE-2021-3623

2022-02-03 Thread Seunghun Han
Hello Moritz and Bastian, Thank you for your information. I have updated libtpms to the latest version and uploaded it. Best regards, Seunghun On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 8:33 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > > Please update to the latest version, which has this CVE fixed.

Bug#1001153: acpitool exits with an assertion if moe than 4 power sources in sysfs

2022-02-03 Thread Seunghun Han
Hello Dietz and Dave, Thank you for your information. I have included Dietz's patch and uploaded it. If you have any other problems, please let me know. Best regards, Seunghun

Bug#997016: closed by Bastian Germann (Re: Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator)

2021-12-21 Thread Seunghun Han
-- > From: Bastian Germann > To: 997016-d...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:03:10 +0100 > Subject: Re: Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM > emulator > Uploaded. Thank you! > > > -- Forwarded messa

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-17 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:29 PM Seunghun Han wrote: > > No, that can be done later. But I don't like the raised issue about the > > manpages sections. > > The *.conf and *.options belong to section 5 instead of 8. Please hand in a > > patch upstrea

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-10 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 6:03 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > No, that can be done later. But I don't like the raised issue about the > manpages sections. > The *.conf and *.options belong to section 5 instead of 8. Please hand in a > patch upstream and then > import it as a quilt patch (

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-04 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 11:30 AM Seunghun Han wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:43 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > > The failing build is on i386 and also fails natively on my i386 machine. > > It looks a bit like Y2K38 triggering... > I'm sorry. I missed the poin

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-03 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:43 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > Can you explain why it builds on amd64 when it is docker related? I'm sorry that I didn't explain it in detail. The previous build error occurred at GitLab runner, and I found it was a docker environment. To have the identical en

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-01 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:06 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > > Should I fix them by adding a new feature to detect the docker environment? > > That would be nice but is not necessary. If so, I would like to leave it. If you don't mind, would you support the swtpm package [1]? That's the v

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-01 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, > I have created https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swtpm and granted you > maintainer access. Please use that repo from now on. Thank you for your help and giving an access right to debian/swtpm repo. > The upstream branch is a mix of upstream's git commits and gbp imports. > Please fix

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-28 Thread Seunghun Han
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Thank you for your help, Bastian. I just uploaded a new package [1] to mentors.debian.net. Please check it if there are any other issues. Best regards, Seunghun [1]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/swtpm/ On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 6:59 AM Bastian Germann wrote: >

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-24 Thread Seunghun Han
Hello Feri, Thank you for your advice. > The upstream version number should be 0.7.0~rc2 with a tilde instead of > a hyphen to ensure proper ordering (as Lintian warns about). To do such > transformations automatically, put something like this in the watch file: > > uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-23 Thread Seunghun Han
Oct 2021 20:33:38 +0900 Seunghun Han wrote: > > swtpm (0.7.0-rc2-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* New maintainer (Closes: #941199) > >* Changed Standard-Version to 4.5.1 in debian/control > >* Updated debhelper version to 13 in debian/control >

Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging

2021-10-22 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi all, I'm so sorry for letting you wait. I have packaged and uploaded it to mentors.debian.net [1]. I also have sent the RFS [2] to the mailing list. I hope one of Debian developers supports it to get involved in sid. Best regards, Seunghun [1]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/swtpm/ [2]:

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-22 Thread Seunghun Han
-Root to debian/control * Added Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git to debian/control * Converted debian/copyright to dep5-copyright format * Added debian/watch file * Fixed typos in source code and man pages Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#941951: ITA: tpm2-pk11

2021-07-03 Thread Seunghun Han
Hello Sean, On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 4:16 AM Sean Whitton wrote: > Do you still intend to adopt? At the very least seems we should > probably remove this from the RM queue? Thank you for the notification. I heard that this project was deprecated [1] and moved to tpm2-pkcs11 project. So, I would

Bug#975121: fuse-posixovl: this package does _not_ extend mount

2021-04-22 Thread Seunghun Han
Hello Marc, Thank you for the report. I just fixed it and will upload it to unstable. Please check the 1.3-1 version. Best regards, Seunghun On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:24 PM Marc Lehmann wrote: > > Package: fuse-posixovl > Version: 1.2.20120215+gitf5bfe35-3 > Severity: minor > > Dear Maintainer

Bug#986799: CVE-2021-3446

2021-04-13 Thread Seunghun Han
Owner: kkama...@gmail.com Thank you for noticing. I'm checking it and will update the version soon. Best regards, Seunghun On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:45 PM Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Source: libtpms > Severity: grave > Tags: patch security > X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team > > This was as

Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging

2021-03-11 Thread Seunghun Han
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:16 AM Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Control: unblock 941199 by 958509 > > On 2020-04-17 Seunghun Han wrote: > [...] > > Dear Laurent Bigonville and Christian Ehrhardt, > > > I would like to package this one. > > > Best regards, > &

Bug#966857: libtpms: FTBFS: tpm2/NVDynamic.c:126:10: error: ‘nvHandle’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

2020-08-08 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Lucas, On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 5:12 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: libtpms > Version: 0.8.0~dev1-1.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye > ... [snip] ... > > tpm2/NVDynamic.c: In function ‘NvNextByType’:

Bug#964768: libtpms: please make the build reproducible

2020-08-08 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Chris, On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:30 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > > Source: libtpms > Version: 0.8.0~dev1-1.1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: timestamps > X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi, > > Whilst work

Bug#933160: O: cpufreqd -- fully configurable daemon for dynamic frequency and voltage scaling

2020-05-06 Thread Seunghun Han
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 23:36:03 -0300 Tobias Frost wrote: > Package: wnpp > > The current maintainer of cpufreqd, Mattia Dongili , > is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. > Dear Maintainer, I would like to adopt this package. Best regards, Seunghun

Bug#959702: RFS: cpufrequtils/008-2 [ITA] -- utilities to deal with the cpufreq Linux kernel feature

2020-05-05 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Boyuan, Thank you for your advice. I have fixed all issues you said. Please see the comments below. On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:37 AM Boyuan Yang wrote: > > The members of salsa.debian.org/debian group are limited to DDs (Debian > Developers). However, it is possible to add you as the maintaine

Bug#959702: RFS: cpufrequtils/008-2 [ITA] -- utilities to deal with the cpufreq Linux kernel feature

2020-05-04 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Boyuan, Thank you for your advice. Please see comments below. On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:33 AM Boyuan Yang wrote: > > [..snip..] > Are you interested putting the git packaging repo under > salsa.debian.org/debian/ instead of your personal namespace? In this case, > other Debian Developers (DD)

Bug#959702: RFS: cpufrequtils/008-2 [ITA] -- utilities to deal with the cpufreq Linux kernel feature

2020-05-04 Thread Seunghun Han
debian/copyright to dep5. * Fix tyops in man files. * Remove debian/source.lintian-overrides to fix lintian warning. Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#933159: O: cpufrequtils -- utilities to deal with the cpufreq Linux kernel feature

2020-05-03 Thread Seunghun Han
Dear Maintainer, I would like to adopt this package. Best regards, Seunghun On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 23:35:56 -0300 Tobias Frost wrote: > Package: wnpp > > The current maintainer of cpufrequtils, Mattia Dongili , > is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. > > Maintai

Bug#957422: libacpi: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-05-03 Thread Seunghun Han
Dear Matthias Klose, On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:04:00 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:libacpi > Version: 0.2-5 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-10 > > [...snip...] > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least

Bug#959676: RFS: libacpi/0.2-7 -- development files for libacpi

2020-05-03 Thread Seunghun Han
emoved -Wl,--as-needed from debian/rules Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#959660: RFS: vbetool/1.1-5 [ITA] -- run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state

2020-05-03 Thread Seunghun Han
. Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#674887: ITA: vbetool -- run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state

2020-04-30 Thread Seunghun Han
On Mon, 28 May 2012 14:32:58 +0200 Ricardo Mones wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > The current maintainer of vbetool, Bradley Smith , > is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. > Dear Maintainer, I want to adopt this package. Best regards, Seunghun

Bug#959025: RFS: libx86/1.1+ds1-12 [ITA] -- x86 real-mode library

2020-04-28 Thread Seunghun Han
/copyright: - Add comment for fixing lintian warning Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#925042: O: libx86 -- x86 real-mode library - development files

2020-04-27 Thread Seunghun Han
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:38:24 +0100 Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?B?QsOpY3Vl?= wrote: > Package: wnpp > > The current maintainer of libx86, Anibal Monsalve Salazar , > is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. Dear Maintainer, I would like to adopt this package. Best rega

Bug#958839: RFS: fuse-posixovl/1.2.20120215+gitf5bfe35-3 -- FUSE file system that provides POSIX functionality

2020-04-25 Thread Seunghun Han
e the last upload: * Fixed an unreproducible bug (Closes: #782215) - With Reiner Herrmann 's patch Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#958509: RFS: swtpm/0.4.0~dev1-1 [ITP] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2020-04-22 Thread Seunghun Han
guage-extension, and package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig- trigger for upstream code Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#958364: Subject: RFS: libtpms/0.8.0~dev1-1 [ITP] -- TPM emulation library

2020-04-21 Thread Seunghun Han
; > instead. > > * With your current debian/*.install files, there are absolutely no necessity > to build-depends on dh-exec. Please remove such dependency and remove > corresponding shebang in *.install files. > > Let me know after you finish all those tweaks or if you have

Bug#958364: Subject: RFS: libtpms/0.8.0~dev1-1 [ITP] -- TPM emulation library

2020-04-20 Thread Seunghun Han
warning in man pages * Set date of man pages to last changelog entry Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#958071:

2020-04-18 Thread Seunghun Han
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 6:23 PM Yangfl wrote: > I usually don't bother with ITP if no one is working on it and being a > dependency of #941199 which nobody claimed. If you are more > experienced in TPM I would be happy to let you take over this package. Hello Yangfl, I also checked #941199 for p

Bug#958071:

2020-04-18 Thread Seunghun Han
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 1:42 PM Yangfl wrote: > > Already done here https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libtpms_0.7.0-1.html Hello Yangfl, Thank you for letting me know. By the way, did you report the ITP for packaging to the bug report system? As I know, you should do it for a new package. Addit

Bug#958071: ITP: libtpms -- Library for TPM 1.2 and 2.0 emulator

2020-04-17 Thread Seunghun Han
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libtpms Version : 0.8.0~dev1 Upstream Author : Stefan Berger * URL : https://github.com/stefanberger/libtpms/wiki * License : 3-clause BSD license Programming Lang: C Description : Library for TPM 1.2 and

Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging

2020-04-16 Thread Seunghun Han
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:44:42 +0100 Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi, > since [1] seems to have valid packaging content and I've had a few users > reporting to use that for a while and it works well. Therefore I wanted to > ask what this might be missing - just someone who does the dput or was > there

Bug#941951: ITA: tpm2-pk11

2020-04-07 Thread Seunghun Han
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:33:07 + "proc...@riseup.net" wrote: > Package: wnpp > X-Debbugs-CC: whonix-de...@whonix.org > > * Package name: tpm2-pk11 > Version : ? > Upstream Author : Iwan Timmer > * URL : https://github.com/irtimmer/tpm2-pk11 > * License : BSD

Bug#956091: RFS: acpitool/0.5.1-6 [ITA] -- command line ACPI client

2020-04-06 Thread Seunghun Han
ilt option from debian/rules * Removed debian/acpitool-dbg.substvars file Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#956087: RFS: yacpi/3.0.1-2 [ITA] -- ncurses based acpi monitor for text mode

2020-04-06 Thread Seunghun Han
* Changed NEWS from bulleted list to regular paragraphs * Enabled hardening flags when building Regards, -- Seunghun Han

Bug#842556: ITA: yacpi - ncurses based acpi monitor for text mode

2020-04-06 Thread Seunghun Han
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:25:10 +0100 Nico Golde wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > Dear maintainer, I would like to adopt this package. Best regards, Seunghun

Bug#955599: RFS: acpitool/0.5.1-5 [ITA] -- command line ACPI client

2020-04-02 Thread Seunghun Han
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "acpitool". * Package name: acpitool Version : 0.5.1-5 Upstream Author : David Leemans * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/acpitool/ * License : GP

Bug#931939: ITA: acpitool -- command line ACPI client

2020-04-02 Thread Seunghun Han
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:12:50 -0500 jathan wrote: > Hi, > > I want to keep going on this in the right way to start maintaining > acpitool since now. Could someone help me to start please? > > Best regards > Jathan I have contacted Jathan and will adopt this package instead of him. Best regards,

Bug#955457: nautilus: dpkg-source failure bug when building it again

2020-03-31 Thread Seunghun Han
Package: nautilus Version: 3.30.5-2 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, I'm building nautilus for testing some features of it. However, I got a problem with building it using the debuild command. Once building this package is a success or not, the next build process fails because of unwanted binary

Bug#955375: RFS: libacpi/0.2-6 [ITA] -- development files for libacpi

2020-03-30 Thread Seunghun Han
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libacpi" * Package name: libacpi Version : 0.2-6 Upstream Author : Nico Golde * URL : http://www.ngolde.de/libacpi.html * License : MIT * Vcs

Bug#842559: ITA: libacpi - general purpose library for ACPI

2020-03-29 Thread Seunghun Han
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:24:35 +0100 Nico Golde wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > I intend to orphan the libacpi package. Dear maintainer, I would like to adopt this package. Best regards, Seunghun

Bug#954445: RFS: fuse-posixovl/1.2.20120215+gitf5bfe35-2 -- FUSE file system that provides POSIX functionality

2020-03-21 Thread Seunghun Han
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fuse-posixovl" * Package name: fuse-posixovl Version : 1.2.20120215+gitf5bfe35-2 Upstream Author : Jan Engelhardt , < jeng...@computergmbh.de> * URL : https://s

Bug#954383: RFS: gexec/0.4-3 [ITA] -- Small command executer with autocompletion using GTK+

2020-03-20 Thread Seunghun Han
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexec" * Package name: gexec Version : 0.4-3 Upstream Author : Ferry Boender * URL : https://github.com/fboender/gexec * License : GPL-2+ * Vcs

Bug#920107: ITA: fuse-posixovl -- FUSE file system that provides POSIX functionality

2020-03-19 Thread Seunghun Han
Package: wnpp I tend to adopt the package. Best regards, Seunghun

Bug#834986: ITA: gexec -- Small command executer with autocompletion using GTK+

2020-03-18 Thread Seunghun Han
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hello Tobias, I would like to tend to adopt gexec package. Best regards, Seunghun