Bug#810968: [debian-mysql] Bug#810968: Bug#810968: mariadb-server-10.0: Logrotate exists 1 if a non-debian mysqld is running (e.g. containerized mysqld)

2016-03-10 Thread Sergey Vojtovich
FYI: applied to MariaDB 10.0 https://github.com/MariaDB/server/commit/8942824a5304e23f765b88d07498786d80092843

Bug#810968: [debian-mysql] Bug#810968: Bug#810968: mariadb-server-10.0: Logrotate exists 1 if a non-debian mysqld is running (e.g. containerized mysqld)

2016-03-08 Thread Sergey Vojtovich
Hi Lennart, On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 04:25:06PM +, Lennart Weller wrote: > March 8 2016 1:52 PM, "Sergey Vojtovich" wrote: > > I adjusted your patch a bit, it seem to work well for me. Could you please > > verify if you're fine with the attached version and it wo

Bug#810968: [debian-mysql] Bug#810968: Bug#810968: mariadb-server-10.0: Logrotate exists 1 if a non-debian mysqld is running (e.g. containerized mysqld)

2016-03-08 Thread Sergey Vojtovich
Hi Lennart, I adjusted your patch a bit, it seem to work well for me. Could you please verify if you're fine with the attached version and it works for you too? On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:35:43PM +0100, Lennart Weller wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:37:49PM +0400, Sergey Vojtovi

Bug#810968: [debian-mysql] Bug#810968: Bug#810968: mariadb-server-10.0: Logrotate exists 1 if a non-debian mysqld is running (e.g. containerized mysqld)

2016-03-07 Thread Sergey Vojtovich
Lennart, On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:43:14PM +0100, Lennart Weller wrote: ...skip... > diff --git a/mariadb-server-10.0.mysql-server.logrotate.orig > b/mariadb-server-10.0.mysql-server.logrotate > index 52f1292..9a2050a 100644 > --- a/mariadb-server-10.0.mysql-server.logrotate.orig > +++ b/mariad

Bug#810968: Fwd: [debian-mysql] Bug#810968: Bug#810968: mariadb-server-10.0: Logrotate exists 1 if a non-debian mysqld is running (e.g. containerized mysqld)

2016-03-07 Thread Sergey Vojtovich
Hi Lennart, First, thanks for reporting this problem back to us and for suggested fix. > March 3 2016 9:35 PM, "Otto Kekäläinen" wrote: > > Hello Lennart! > > > > I asked core developers to review this and got this reply: > > > > It's probably alright for 10.0. But it's not completely suitable f