Package: libarchive-zip-perl
Version: 1.68-1
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
The crc32 utility computes a checksum of the given files, e.g.:
$ filename=blah ; filepath=/tmp/"${filename}" ; echo foo > "${filepath}" ;
crc32 "${filepath}"
7e3265a8
However, when part of the filename looks like a
This is due to improper use of setuptools_scm in docs/conf.py. This is
fixed [1] in version 0.16.8, along with other build errors. Please
consider packaging the new version.
[1]
https://github.com/pimutils/vdirsyncer/commit/b1214cd693d7a6c6693da3d070e8b9965a84a88e
Package: python-jpype
Version: 0.5.4.2-3+b1
The newest version of Jpype in Debian is currently 0.5.4.2, which is
from 2011. The latest upstream version is 0.6.2, which is from 2017.
Some Python packages (e.g. JayDeBeApi) require a newer version of Jpype
than the one in Debian. There's also Python
Package: python-pymssql
Version: 1.0.2+dfsg-1+b3
Tags: patch
It'd be nice if the patch would be applied to the stable release.
Package: bubbros
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.2
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
Dear Maintainer,
According to bubbob/levels/README.txt (and the file program) the *.bin files
in bubbob/levels are MacBinary files. There appears to be no source for these
Package: xtv
Version: 1.1-13
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.5
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
Dear Maintainer,
The debian/copyright file says that xtv falls under the Artistic License.
However, xtv.lsm says "Copying-policy: GPL". Please fix the copyright file or
moti
Package: txt2html
Version: 2.51-1
Severity: normal
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
Dear Maintainer,
The debian/copyright file says that this program is licensed under the
Artistic License. But the README file says that it's licensed under the same
terms as Perl itself. Perl's c
I came across this bug while checking license issues for Debian
derivative gNewSense. It looks like this is the only unresolved one left
in the list of "serious issues" in debian/copyright.
What's the current status? Can we assume that everything in extsizes
falls in the public domain?
--
To UN
Package: htp
Version: 1.16-4
Severity: normal
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
The license information in debian/copyright says that this package is released
under the Artistic License. However, src/LICENSE.txt says that sprintf.*
(probably should be snprintf.*) is licensed under
Package: latex2html
Version: 2008-debian1
Severity: normal
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
Dear Maintainer,
The debian/copyright file says that files under L2hos/ are licensed under
the Artistic License. But File::Spec, from which those files are derived,
is under the same lice
Package: ruby-opengl
Version: 0.60.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
Dear Maintainer,
The debian/copyright file says that the files in examples/NeHe/ are "licensed
under a free license", but it doesn't specify whic
I think we have a misunderstanding. If I understand correctly then
you're talking about finding and listing all installed browsers. I
agree that that is difficult and distro-specific.
My suggestion is to keep the hard coded browsers array (perhaps
slightly modified) that's already in src/ui/ui_pre
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Now I understand that the samples are the stdout/stderr logs from other
programs and not any conventional kind of file format. Given that, it
seems perfectly clear that these texts should be understood to refer to
those programs and not these files. I agree that the notice
Niels Möller wrote:
And now enter lshd, which is *not* PAMified.
The comments in doc/NOTES indicate that's it's not going to happen in
the future either. Although the code does seem to have some PAM support
in the form of lsh-pam-checkpw. But that probably wouldn't set the umask
if it were
Package: lsh-server
Version: 2.0.4-dfsg-7
Severity: normal
The default umask on a Squeeze system is 0022. However, when I
connect via ssh to lsh-server on my Squeeze system the umask
in the session is . It would make more sense to also have
0022 there.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6
license [2]? Both packages that use your code
are under the GPL license, so the 3-clause license is needed.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ModifiedBSD
[2] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OriginalBSD
Regards,
Sam Geeraerts
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
Sebastian Muszynski wrote:
I will remove the ripdump-Implementation from ax25spyd ASAP.
It is possible to cancel the removal request?
Hi Sebastian,
Do you plan to re-introduce this package with the non-free code removed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
It looks like this was fixed for Wheezy, but not for Squeeze. Will the
stable release also get a fix?
Thanks,
Sam Geeraerts
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Klaus Reimer wrote:
Together we (Howard and I) created the
arc project on Sourceforge, Howard uploaded the original sources of the
Unix version of arc and we added a COPYING file (GPL license) and a
LICENSE file which describes the license change. The comments in the
original source files were ne
Package: sharand
Version: 0.0.20040607-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
File main/sha1.c has this license notice:
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works th
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Looks like you found a ugly glitch in reprepro's pool handling.
Looking at the names of files in pool/ it does not expect the slash
coming from the component in there.
That's what I figured when I skimmed pool.c.
The consequences are this ugly warning and reprepro bein
Package: reprepro
Version: 4.2.0-2squeeze1
Severity: normal
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
When I use reprepro to create a local repository for or including Squeeze's
security updates, I get warnings about a "strange filekey". E.g. when I
`reprepro -b . update':
Warning: stran
Package: as31
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file examples/paulmon1.asm has the following notice:
"Please distribute freely -- may not be sold, period."
Restricting commercial distribution violates D
Package: avogadro
Version: 1.0.1-3+b1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.6, 2.1.1
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The directory 'testfiles' in the source package contans some files
that appear to have a non-free license.
methane.g03 has this
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
File main/sha1.c has this license notice:
* This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
* others,
Package: antlr-doc
Version: 2.7.7-16
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: libreplanet gnewsense
In directory examples/java/unicode.IDENTs there are 2 files,
ShowString.java and StreamConverter.java that have this license
statement:
Package: a2ps
Version: 1:4.14-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
Usertags: libreplanet
The license notice in afm/MustRead.html says the following:
"This file and the 35 PostScript(R) AFM files it
accompanies may be used, copied, and distributed for any purpose and
wi
I certainly want to help getting this solved, but I don't know what all
the appropriate actions are. I also don't know what's involved in the
intermediate approach you suggest, but from your explanation I gather
that's easier. I'm guessing the next stable point release is not far
off, so the la
I'm happy those files are deleted upstream (at least in the stable
branch). But I think at least these terms make the .exe files
undistributable:
* publish the software for others to copy;
* transfer the software or this agreement to any third party; or
AFAIK, that does require that th
Package: adolc
Version: 2.1.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The source package contains the files vcredist_x86.exe and vcredist_x64.exe.
The following is an excerpt from eula.rtf contained in those CAB ar
Package: alpine
Version: 2.00+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file pico/msmem.c contains the following comment:
===
* This code originally written by Stephen Chung and posted to a Usene
Package: arc
Version: 5.21o-2
Severity: important
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The debian/copyright file says that arc fall under the GPL. However, several
files in the package indicate that the software is in fact non-free.
a) The files arc.c and marc.c have the
Will the file be updated with that information to avoid confusion with
its use in other packages and distributions?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 04:51:52PM +0200, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
So we know that the relicensing happend prior to its use by nyquist.
(I don't know the specific date, however, which is why I said "not
sure", above).
Does that help?
I had a clos
Sebastian Muszynski has sent an e-mail to the copyright holder to ask
about relicensing the code. No response so far, afaik. See bug report
#630894.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
When was the code relicensed?
Not sure.
Then how can we determine if any of the xlisp dependent packages in any
of the Debian versions are still affected?
It would also be good to make this information available to other
distributions who might be distributing affe
The Classpath project seems to have a bug report about this [1]. It
links to a possible solution in OpenJDK7.
[1] http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=363
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Package: icedtea6-plugin
Version: 6b18-1.8.7-2~squeeze1
Severity: normal
When I visit http://www.iok.be/htmlsite/ABkalender-gidsmain.html with Epiphany
I get the following error (Epiphany started from a terminal):
java version "1.6.0_18"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.8.7) (6b18-1.8.7-2
Will the file be updated with that information to avoid confusion with
its use in other packages and distributions?
When was the code relicensed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: liferea
Version: 1.6.4-1
Severity: normal
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
Menu Tools -> Preferences -> Browser -> Browser lists several browsers that can
be set to use as external Web browser. The list contains (among others)
Konqueror and Opera, neither of which I have
Nearly the same file is also used in the nyquist package, see bug #631646.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: nyquist
Version: 2.29-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file xlisp/xlbfun.c contains the following license notice:
/* Copyright (c) 1985, by David Michael Betz
All Rights Reserved
Permis
Package: audacity
Version: 1.3.12-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file lib-src/libnyquist/nyquist/xlisp/xlbfun.c contains the following
license notice:
/* Copyright (c) 1985, by David Michael Betz
All
Package: abuse-frabs
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.1, 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The license notice in addon/claudio/claudio.lsp does not allow distribution or
commercial use. It probably applies to all files in addon/claudio.
Note that the same file exists also in ax25-apps. See bug report #630893.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Note that the same file exists also in ax25spyd. See bug report #630894.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: ace
Version: 5.7.7-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1.6, 2.1.7
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
In ACE+TAO+CIAO-src-5.7.7.tar.bz2 there is document ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/
connectors/dds4ccm/docs/ptc_09-10-26 DDS4CCM v1-0 WCB.pdf, which
Package: ax25spyd
Version: 0.23-8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file src/ripdump.c has the following license notice:
* Changes Copyright (c) 1993 Jeff White - N0POY, All Rights Reserved.
* Permission granted fo
Package: ax25-apps
Version: 0.0.6-16.2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
The file listen/ripdump.c has the following license notice:
* Changes Copyright (c) 1993 Jeff White - N0POY, All Rights Reserved.
* Permission granted for no
Package: axiom
Version: 20100701-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: libreplanet
The file zips/omcv1.4a.tgz/OMCv1.4a/src/copyright says
The SOFTWARE is provided for non-commercial use only. Any use or
reproduction of any part of
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense
Usertags: libreplanet
We'd also like to see this change for gNewSense. Did you hear back from
upstream? I see that there's a poll on their website now for new
features. Substituting poweriso currently has 0% votes. :(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
I found that the patch from GNU bug report 4958 does work. I didn't
realize that the patched files needed to be byte-compiled.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I edited the two .el files as suggested in this very similar upstream
bug report [1], but it doesn't work for me.
[1] http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=4958
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
Package: erc
Version: 5.3-1
Severity: normal
I connect to freenode.net using M-x erc-tls. I accept irc.freenode.net
for the IRC server, change the port to 6697, enter my user name and leave
the password blank (I've configured automatic identification to NickServ).
It connects fine and just works.
AMS have updated the license. Is it possible to still get this into Squeeze?
Originele bericht
Onderwerp: [Gnewsense-dev] Restatement of AMS-LaTeX license
Datum: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:34:08 -0400
Van: David M. Jones
Dear Benedikt, et al,
Enclosed is a copy of a new license file
Kilgard's "Yes, that's fine" reply for bug #131997 only applies to that
package, not to all of his code with that same license notice. Both
pointblast.c and spriteblast.c are not in that package, so they still
fall under the original (unclarified) non-DFSG-free license. See the
FSF's statement
Julien Cristau schreef:
Because the code in Mesa seems to be based on that of glut, but has
been modified since it was included.
I can't see any substantial modification in src/glut/glx since the
initial import.
I mostly looked at include/GL/glut.h, because that file was mentioned in
the gNe
Julien Cristau schreef:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 19:25:31 +0100, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
A similar issue was reported (and resolved) for glutg3-dev, see Debian bug
report #131997.
It's not a similar issue, it's the exact same one. So why do you open
this exactly?
Because the co
Package: mesa
Version: 7.0.3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
Subject: mesa: glut files have non-DFSG-free license
Package: mesa
Version: 7.0.3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
Some files in mesa have the following license:
/* This program is freely distributable without l
Benedikt Ahrens schreef:
hello,
the AMS has decided to publish amslatex under LPPL. see david jones'
message on the bottom.
this concerns future releases only. is this ok for gns? can we keep the
current package even if it isn't covered legally by this license?
Thanks for following up on this
60 matches
Mail list logo
