On 06/08/2015 12:48, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> Here is the correspondinf part of the gdb session with symbols from
> systemd-dbg_224-1_sparc64.deb:
>
Many thanks.
The log below pretty much does confirm that it is taking the suspected
path through the code. Some steps are not visible to the debug
It looks like stdout and/or stderr output is mixed up with the strace
output but it looks udevd is failing because the chdir to / fails.
Notes inline below. (Caution I'm comparing against current systemd git
HEAD and not any specific version)
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/u
Hi,
On 28/04/2014 18:25, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
has a struct on heap (#L102, #L138, #L146):
struct w_list{
...
union w_list_data
{
...
struct write_opts write;
...
} u;
}
...
struct w_list *a;
...
a = ca
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version: squeeze official netboot.
Date: 20/Feb/2011
Machine: SunFire V120
Partitions: n/a
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try
On 15/02/2011 16:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the linux-2.6 package:
#609371: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64: module scsi_mod: Unknown relocation:
36
It has been closed by Ben Hutchings.
Tested o
On 19/02/2011 23:20, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:06:04PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:49:39AM +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
[Cc'd to 611...@bugs.debian.org]
...
I tested with your netboot image and it exhibits the same behaviour
as the off
[Cc'd to 611...@bugs.debian.org]
On 10/02/2011 08:36, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:07:49PM +0000, Richard Mortimer wrote:
On 09/02/2011 21:43, Jurij Smakov wrote:
... snip ...
http://www.wooyd.org/debian/squeeze/
...
Sure, I have just uploaded a netboot image t
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-sparc/current/images/netboot/boot.img
dated 21:46 19-01-11 size 9750128
Date: Thu 27 Jan 23:00 GMT (approx)
Machine: SunF
On 21/01/2011 22:50, Richard Mortimer wrote:
On 21/01/2011 20:40, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Richard Mortimer (ri...@oldelvet.org.uk) wrote:
Thanks for the info! At first glance, it does not seem to contradict my
findings. When you find time, can you have a try at v3 I just posted ?
I&#
On 21/01/2011 20:40, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Richard Mortimer (ri...@oldelvet.org.uk) wrote:
[...]
P.S. I saw your followup mail so hopefully this matches what you have found!
Thanks for the info! At first glance, it does not seem to contradict my
findings. When you find time, can you
On 21/01/2011 18:52, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Richard Mortimer (ri...@oldelvet.org.uk) wrote:
...
I'm also getting a lot of Kernel unaligned access errors from the
kernel. I don't know if they are related to this or not and this is the
first time that I personally have got 2.6.37
On 21/01/2011 00:04, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* David Miller (da...@davemloft.net) wrote:
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:33:39 -0500
So I guess we go for the following. Is it verbose enough ?
It's got all of the details that seem to matter, thanks.
I'm letting people f
On 18/01/2011 06:08, David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:00:39 -0800 (PST)
ftrace: Remove unnecessary alignment tag from ftrace_event_call.
It's completely unnecessary and causes problems on platforms
where this tag down-aligns the structure's alignment.
Signed-
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 10:52 +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
>
> On 18/01/2011 06:50, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Miller
> > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:37:09 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >> So we do end up seeing the R_SPARC_LO10 + R_SPARC_13 sequence
On 18/01/2011 06:50, David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:37:09 -0800 (PST)
So we do end up seeing the R_SPARC_LO10 + R_SPARC_13 sequences in the
final module object.
Therefore, we really should handle R_SPARC_13 in the sparc module loader.
Ok, I now feel like I
On 18/01/2011 00:37, David Miller wrote:
From: Richard Mortimer
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:34:03 +
I guess that points towards the binutils linker not doing the correct
thing.
Ok, it is in fact doing the correct thing.
I'm really surprised we never hit this before in all of these
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 13:02 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Richard Mortimer
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:46:21 +
>
> > As an example from drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c function scsi_eh_wakeup().
> >
> > This has relocation records of
> ...
>
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:22 +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 22:07 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Miller
> > Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:17:22 -0800 (PST)
>
> > > I think the problem we have here is that the _ftrace_events section is
>
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 22:07 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:17:22 -0800 (PST)
> > I think the problem we have here is that the _ftrace_events section is
> > not aligned sufficiently. That ".align 4" mnemonic is a good indication
> > of this. It should
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 21:17 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Richard Mortimer
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:08:30 +
>
> [ Frederic, Steven, Ingo, the short version of the story is that we
> need to make it such that the _ftrace_events section is aligned
> properly for 6
Hi,
On 15/01/2011 10:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:38:28AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Richard Mortimer
So that means that the kernel is complaining about type 54 which is
R_SPARC_UA64. That matches with the objdump output which doesn't list
R_SPARC_LM2
002bf4 R_SPARC_13*ABS*+0x0020
2be0: 03 00 00 00 sethi %hi(0), %g1
2be4: c4 00 60 00 ld [ %g1 ], %g2
sethi %hi(__tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup), %g1
lduw[%g1+%lo(__tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup)+8], %g2
Regards
Richard
On
On 13/01/2011 23:57, David Miller wrote:
From: Richard Mortimer
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:34:01 +
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:37 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:27 +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
On 09/01/2011 03:46, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:37 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:27 +0000, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> >
> > On 09/01/2011 03:46, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Ben Hutchings
> > > Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 03:00:40 +
> > >
> &g
On 09/01/2011 03:46, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 03:00:40 +
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 01:05 +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Boot of linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64 fails to find the
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Boot of linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64 fails to find the disks and drops
to the initramfs prompt. When I try to load the sym53c8xx driver it fails
as follows
(initramfs) modprobe sym53c8xx
[ 122.470284] module scsi_mod: Unkno
e kernel is fully initialised.
Richard
--
Richard Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
Severity: normal
I am seeing repeated "Kernel unaligned access" messages on a Sun Netra X1
machine. These typically happen in blocks of 5 every 6 seconds or so. The
pattern is not totally regular an sometime 20 or 30 second may pass wi
anks for checking
Richard
--
Richard Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
The attached patch has been tested with the sources for 2.6.18-7 and
fixes the problem for me. This patch has been passed on upstream and
Jurij is aware of it.
Richard
--
Richard Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From b5530bfb19f6dc678c0be88f2071ba79e92b9d3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64
Version: 2.6.18-8
Severity: important
The Debian 2.6.18 kernel images do not boot on my Netra X1 machine. The
same machine boots with Debian 2.6.17. I have not tried any kernel.org
versions on this machine.
I get the following Oops
boot: Linux -p
Allocated 8
On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 11:30 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:13:53PM +0000, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> > Hi Jurij,
> >
> > Did you get around to building the mini-iso image? I'm happy to test
> > when you have it ready.
>
> Hi Richard,
Hi Jurij,
Did you get around to building the mini-iso image? I'm happy to test
when you have it ready.
Regards
Richard
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 15:48 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:58:18PM +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> You are right t
8:00:20:F8:35:85, IRQ 7475200.
...
Thus for your patch to work the tulip and dmfe drivers would need to be
compiled in statically rather than as modules.
Thanks
Richard
--
Richard Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.23
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/images/daily/sparc64/netboot/2.6/boot.img
build 27/Nov/2006
Date:
Machine: Sun Netra X1
Partitions:
pingu:~# fdisk -l /dev/h
Package: l2tpns
Version: 2.1.10rem-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Trying to setup a ipsec/l2tp connection from a Windows XP client to a SPARC
server I always get bus errors from l2tpns. This makes the package totally
unusable on SPARC.
I did some digging around and have determined that the bu
Package: logwatch
Version: 5.2.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Logwatch is reporting unmatched cron entries for users with a '-' in the
username. e.g.
Unmatched Entries:
root : TTY=pts/0 ; PWD=/tmp ; USER=Debian-exim ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/test -w
/var/spool/exim4
root : TTY=pts/0 ; PWD=/tm
37 matches
Mail list logo
