On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:43:43 -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Thanks for this report. If we're able to provide builds with this patch
> backported, will you be able to validate that the issue is resolved? If
> so, we should be able to get this fixed in an upcoming buster point
> release.
Yes, this
Package: dovecot-core
Version: 2.3.4.1-5+deb10u4
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
The search via the solr_plugin fails frequently on rather big accounts with
that error:
Error: fts_solr: received invalid uid '0'
The search via imap timeout after 10 seconds.
"Based on the XM
I rebuilded the packages on my side. That would be nice to see this bug fixed
in buster release.
--
infomaniak
Raphaël Walther | Administrateur système
Rue Eugène-Marziano 25, 1227 Genève
Swiss Made| ISO 27001 14001 50001
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I have applied the patch for dovecot version 2.3.4.1 in buster. May I submit it
to the release team ? The final version would be:
dovecot (1:2.3.4.1-5+deb10u4) buster; urgency=medium
Thomas Goirand helped me to build this.
Regards,
Raphaël
--
infomaniak
Raphaël Walther
Issue solved by loading additional kernel modules:
modprobe ipmi_devintf
modprobe ipmi_msghandler
modprobe ipmi_poweroff
modprobe ipmi_si
modprobe ipmi_watchdog
Regards,
Raphaël
Package: freeipmi
Version: 1.4.5-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
On 3 machines using Xen after reboot in the Dom0:
The following command return part of the result and a segmentation
fault:
root@x30:~# ipmi-sensors
...
Segmentation fault
root@x30:~# dmesg
Mar 9 10:47:32 x30 kernel: [ 54
Yes, you are right. I replicate the issue when I print. Sorry for the noise.
Cheers, Raphaël
I think this is fixed in lastest stable package of cups (version
1.7.5-11+deb8u1). Could you confirm?
Cheers,
Raphaël
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
UserTags: udd
Severity: normal
Hi,
I notice that the done_date in tables archived_bugs and bugs in udd is always
set to 1970-01-01 00:00:00.
On a local réplica of udd:
loading=# select distinct done_date from archived_bugs;
d
=\ \'UTF8\'\;/ | psql -q myudd
Not sure it is the perfect solution but it helps in my case.
Raphaël Walther
Hi,
Thanks for writing.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 09:59:00PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:26:00AM +0100, Raphaël Walther wrote:
> > +Debian is a community of people who value respect and dialog. If you
> > +are a victim of any behaviour that harms you or fee
Hello,
Please find a new patch which take into account pabs comments.
--- contact.wml 2013-11-01 18:01:25.823457259 +0100
+++ contact.wml.new 2013-11-03 11:07:37.599540930 +0100
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
Reporting problems in Debian packages
Debian Development
Problems with Debian infrastruct
Hi Gaudenz,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:24:17PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Raphaël Walther writes:
>
> > I reproduce the same issue on the same computer with the new
> > motherboard. I tried to encrypt a partition and it failed again at the
> > same step.
>
>
I reproduce the same issue on the same computer with the new
motherboard. I tried to encrypt a partition and it failed again at the
same step.
Cheers,
Raphaël
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Hi & thanks for helping !
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 09:23:23AM +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> quick googling, FWIW, reports bad sata cables/drives...
Well, I can do a none-encrypted install and that works.
But today, a technician has changed the motherboard of the computer in
order to solve a wif
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.49
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When I did an assisted install of an encrypted LVM, it failed twice already at
the same step. It failed when it should erase the disk after 3-5 minutes.
Picture of
error message in French and logs will follow shortly.
16 matches
Mail list logo
