Bug#900668: afflib FTCBFS: configure.ac has broken cross compilation branches

2018-06-05 Thread Phillip Hellewell
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Phillip Hellewell wrote: > Ok, not a problem. I will take care of it soon. > Committed: https://github.com/sshock/AFFLIBv3/commit/92ee47f7ef6e26f6c9f10e24fda3970b6c109685 Phillip

Bug#900668: afflib FTCBFS: configure.ac has broken cross compilation branches

2018-06-05 Thread Phillip Hellewell
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Thank you for the offer, but I need to optimize for throughput. I've > sent around 1000 or such patches for cross building and this diff > doesn't even look copyright-able to me. Can you just apply it? > Ok, not a problem. I will take care

Bug#900668: afflib FTCBFS: configure.ac has broken cross compilation branches

2018-06-03 Thread Phillip Hellewell
Thanks Helmut. I can fix this upstream on https://github.com/sshock/AFFLIBv3/ Would you like to submit it as a pull request on github so you can get proper attribution? Phillip On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Source: afflib > Version: 3.7.16-3 > Tags: patch upstream >

Bug#892599: afflib: CVE-2018-8050

2018-03-11 Thread Phillip Hellewell
I checked in the fix for this in commit 435a2ca ( https://github.com/sshock/AFFLIBv3/commit/435a2ca). (Sorry I didn't have a CVE id yet so that was not included in the commit comment.) What needs to happen now? Do I need to do anything or can you guys take it from here? Phillip On Sun, Mar 11,

Bug#837478: Static libraries - PIC or PIE?

2016-11-21 Thread Phillip Hellewell
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:12:19PM -0700, Phillip Hellewell wrote: >>... >> - Now tries to link a few of the libraries statically (e.g., >> libicuuc.a). ld blows up with a bunch of relocation R_X86_64_32S, blah &g

Bug#837478: Static libraries - PIC or PIE?

2016-11-19 Thread Phillip Hellewell
Consider this use case for an end user with 64-bit Debian 9: - Compiles an executable with gcc, linking a few libraries like ICU, openssl, bz2, etc. Works fine. - Now tries to link a few of the libraries statically (e.g., libicuuc.a). ld blows up with a bunch of relocation R_X86_64_32S, b

Bug#676176: trac: Unable to show changeset : TypeError: expecting an integer for the buffer size

2013-09-17 Thread Phillip Hellewell
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > bug 676176 is assigned to the trac package, but the version number > you're citing seems to be a python-subversion version number. I don't have trac installed; I'm not using trac at all. I'm seeing the problem with viewvc 1.1.5-1.4 an

Bug#676176: Still a problem...

2013-07-10 Thread Phillip Hellewell
This is still a problem in the latest version, 1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u3. Please fix it. It's annoying to have to re-patch core.py every time python-subversion gets updated. Phillip H -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Bug#676176: Still a problem...

2013-06-03 Thread Phillip Hellewell
This is still a problem with the latest version, 1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u2. I had to workaround it with the original patch mentioned here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676176#10 This workaround didn't help (and was actually already in place): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Bug#613920: I need this too

2012-05-21 Thread Phillip Hellewell
I need KrbAppendRealm too, and I was kinda bummed when I found out (the hard way) that I needed to patch it manually. Any reason not to apply this patch? Phillip -- Phillip Hellewell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Bug#504456: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#504456: Bug#504456: Bug no longer exists upstream

2009-01-19 Thread Phillip Hellewell
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > What I'm wondering though is: > This fix is included in the final 0.7.0 release (which was on Nov 27th). > > Does that mean, that this problem is fixed for you with 0.7.0-1 from > experimental? > I bet it is fixed in 0.7.0-1, but I don't kn

Bug#504456: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#504456: Bug no longer exists upstream

2009-01-19 Thread Phillip Hellewell
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Phillip Hellewell wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Now that NetworkManager is managed via git, you could try to use the >> great "git bisect" feature to get the relevant commit. >> >

Bug#504456: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#504456: Bug no longer exists upstream

2009-01-19 Thread Phillip Hellewell
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Now that NetworkManager is managed via git, you could try to use the > great "git bisect" feature to get the relevant commit. > It's funny you should mention that, because that's exactly what I started doing last night. Unfortunately, I ha

Bug#504456: Bug no longer exists upstream

2009-01-18 Thread Phillip Hellewell
Please see comment #12 on the upstream bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564709 The real problem was nm-system-settings returning non-null zero-length secrets over dbus (secrets that should not have been returned at all). However, the latest nm-system-settings (from svn) works correct

Bug#504456: Patch available

2008-12-20 Thread Phillip Hellewell
I created a bug upstream and submitted a patch too. Please give it a try. Upstream bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564709 Patch: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=124773&action=view Phillip Hellewell

Bug#430065: bind9: named dies after assert (socket.c:1663: INSIST(!sock->pending_send))

2007-06-21 Thread Phillip Hellewell
Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.3.4-2 Severity: normal I can't track down exactly what triggers this, but I have some zones set up that are forward only and forwarder is a DNS server on the other end of a VPN tunnel. Sometimes that tunnel is down and I believe that is when the problem seems to happe